Ablation or Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Treatment (FAST)

The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified March 2008 by St. Antonius Hospital.
Recruitment status was  Recruiting
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
AtriCure, Inc.
Information provided by:
St. Antonius Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00662701
First received: March 25, 2008
Last updated: April 17, 2008
Last verified: March 2008

March 25, 2008
April 17, 2008
May 2007
May 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Freedom from AF and/or secondary left atrial arrhythmias, lasting >60 sec, as determined by 7 day continuous Holter monitoring. [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Safety and/or adverse events [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00662701 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Freedom of AADs, Decrease in the frequency and duration of AF episodes, Decrease in the number of AF related hospital admissions, Improvement in quality of life internet Follow Up, Decrease in number of cardioversions, PM implant [ Time Frame: 6 and 12 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Composite major complications, Serious Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Effects [ Time Frame: 12 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Ablation or Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Treatment
Atrial Fibrillation: Ablation or Surgical Treatment; A Randomized Study Comparing Non-Pharmacologic Therapy in Patients With Drug-Refractory Atrial Fibrillation

The purpose of this study is to compare 2 invasive strategies for Atrial Fibrillation treatment, Endocardial catheter ablation isolation of the Pulmonary veins versus minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgical epicardial isolation. Both strategies are in use for several years now, and have been reported as a successful strategy with success rates of 60-90%. However, it is not known which technique is preferable in a given patient population in terms of efficacy to cure AF, safety, or patient discomfort. Therefore, in the present trial a randomized study is proposed to provide more insight into the relative merits of both techniques

Atrial Fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, affecting millions of people around the world. It is a large burden on health care resources and may even lead to a shorter life expectancy. Drug treatment has been found insufficient and sometimes even hazardous to the pt. Traditionally, there was only one invasive approach available, being MAZE 3 procedure by means of full open chest cardiac surgery. This was a very invasive approach, limited to only a few skilled surgeons, with insufficient options to treat large pt volume.

With the discovery that AF often is initiated and maintained by electrical instability inside and around the Pulmonary Veins, catheter ablation is now a widely accepted early invasive strategy to cure AF. Success rates of 60% to 90% have been reported, depending on technique employed and the type of AF (Resp, chronic versus paroxysmal)

Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Atrial Fibrillation
  • Procedure: Catheter Ablation
    RF ablation with complete circumferential ablation around the right and PVs, optional additional lines between the lower and upper PVs, and towards the mitral valve ring.
  • Procedure: Surgical Ablation
    Minimal invasive thoracoscopic surgery including isolation of the PVs by AtriCure and removal of the LAA.
  • Active Comparator: 1
    Catheter RF ablation with complete circumferential ablation around the right and PVs, and additional lines between the lower and upper PVs, and towards the mitral valve ring.
    Intervention: Procedure: Catheter Ablation
  • Active Comparator: 2
    Minimal invasive thoracoscopic surgery including isolation of the PVs by AtriCure and removal of the LAA.
    Intervention: Procedure: Surgical Ablation
Boersma LV, Castella M, van Boven W, Berruezo A, Yilmaz A, Nadal M, Sandoval E, Calvo N, Brugada J, Kelder J, Wijffels M, Mont L. Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation versus surgical ablation treatment (FAST): a 2-center randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2012 Jan 3;125(1):23-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.074047. Epub 2011 Nov 14.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
120
Not Provided
May 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has a history of symptomatic paroxysmal and/or persistent atrial fibrillation for at least 12 months
  • Patient is refractory to or intolerant of at least one antiarrhythmic drug
  • Patient has an enlarged atrium >40 mm and/or Patient has a failed previous catheter ablation and/or Patient has additional risk factors such as hypertension, increasing age
  • Patient is between 30 and 70 years of age
  • Patient is mentally able and willing to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac ablation or surgical cardiac procedure in the last 3 months
  • Previous cardiac tamponade
  • Previous stroke or TIA
  • Left atrial thrombus
  • Left atrial size >65 mm
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <45 %
  • Active infection or sepsis
  • Pregnancy
  • Unstable angina
  • Myocardial infarction (MI) within previous 3 months
  • Atrial fibrillation is secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, or other reversible or non-cardiovascular cause
  • History of blood clotting abnormalities
  • Known sensitivity to heparin or warfarin
  • Life expectancy is less than 12 months
  • Patient is involved in another clinical study involving an investigational drug or device
  • Pleural adhesions
  • Prior thoracotomy
  • Prior cardiac surgery
  • Elevated hemi diaphragm
Both
30 Years to 70 Years
No
Contact: Lucas V Boersma, MD/PhD 31-30-609-3637 l.boersma@antonius.net
Contact: WimJan van Boven, MD 31-30-609-2108 w.boven@antonius.net
Netherlands,   Spain
 
NCT00662701
R-06.30A/FAST
Yes
L.V.A. Boersma, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein
St. Antonius Hospital
  • Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
  • AtriCure, Inc.
Principal Investigator: Lucas Boersma, MD/PhD St.Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein
Principal Investigator: WimJan van Boven, MD St.Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein
Principal Investigator: Lluis Mont, MD Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Principal Investigator: Castella M, MD Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
St. Antonius Hospital
March 2008

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP