ExAblate (Magnetic Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery) Treatment of Metastatic Bone Tumors for the Palliation of Pain
| Tracking Information | |
|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | April 2, 2008 |
| Last Updated Date | September 27, 2012 |
| Start Date ICMJE | March 2008 |
| Primary Completion Date | September 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Improvement in Pain Scores [ Time Frame: Within 3 months of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] |
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current |
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00656305 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current |
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Descriptive Information | |
| Brief Title ICMJE | ExAblate (Magnetic Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery) Treatment of Metastatic Bone Tumors for the Palliation of Pain |
| Official Title ICMJE | A Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of ExAblate (Magnetic Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery) Treatment of Metastatic and Multiple Myeloma Bone Tumors for the Palliation of Pain in Patients Who Are Not Candidates for Radiation Therapy |
| Brief Summary | A Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of ExAblate Treatment of Metastatic Bone and Multiple Myeloma Tumors for the Palliation of Pain in Patients Who are not Candidates for Radiation Therapy |
| Detailed Description | Bone is the third most common organ involved by metastatic disease behind lung and liver [7]. In breast cancer, bone is the second most common site of metastatic spread, and approximately 85% of patients dying of breast cancer have bone metastasis. Breast and prostate cancer metastasize to bone most frequently, which reflects the high incidence of both these tumors, as well as their prolonged clinical courses. The increasing longevity of the population coupled with better therapeutic management of cancer patients contributes to the high incidence and prevalence of metastatic bone lesions. Pain from bone metastases is the most common cause of cancer pain and as more patients are living with bone metastases, improving their quality of life becomes a major challenge. In patients who die from breast, prostate, and lung cancer, autopsy studies have shown that up to 85% have evidence of bone metastases at the time of death [7-9]. Current treatments for patients with bone metastases are primarily palliative and include localized therapies [10], systemic therapies (chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, radiopharmaceutical, and bisphosphonates), and analgesics (opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Recently, radiofrequency ablation has been tested as a treatment option for bone metastases [11]. The main goals of these treatments are improvement of quality of life and functional level. These goals can be further described:
Treatment with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is the standard of care for patients with localized bone pain, and results in the palliation of pain in the majority of these patients. More than 66% of patients with a limited number of well-localized bony metastases can be treated effectively by external-beam irradiation. However, approximately 30% of patients treated with radiation therapy do not experience pain relief [8, 12-16]. Furthermore, there is an increased risk of pathologic fracture in the peri-irradiation period due to an induced hyperemic response at the periphery of the tumor. This weakens the adjacent bone and increases the risk of spontaneous fracture. Adding to this, patients who have recurrent pain at a site previously irradiated may not be eligible for further radiation therapy secondary to limitations in normal tissue tolerance. The speed of response to radiation therapy varies; from the patients that respond most symptomatic bony metastases begin to respond over the course of 10 to 14 days, 70% of patients experience some pain relief within 2 weeks of starting therapy and, within 3 months 90% of patients achieve pain relief. Patients, who had EBRT and failed to improve, may need to seek other therapies such as radio frequency ablation, surgical resection, etc., which are less efficient and have higher treatment related morbidity. Because the ExAblate system is designed to non-invasively ablate tissue, ExAblate may meet the need of these EBRT failed patients. The ExAblate system has the potential to achieve the first three of the four above mentioned goals, as well as changing the treatment limits and resulting morbidity in accordance with the above-mentioned goals [17]. The palliative effect of ExAblate is achieved by heating the bone periosteum, thus ablating the sensory origin of the pain. Based on the FDA approved phase-1 initial study (IDE # G050177 ) results and the results of the study that was performed outside the United States that the sponsor has done, palliation effects are significant in terms of mean improvement, the number of treated patients who reported symptomatic improvement and in their potential durability. Based on the above ExAblate treatment has a potential to be treatment of choice for radiation |
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional |
| Study Phase | Phase 3 |
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition ICMJE |
|
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
| Study Arm (s) |
|
| Publications * | Not Provided |
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|
| Recruitment Information | |
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed |
| Enrollment ICMJE | 147 |
| Completion Date | September 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date | September 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
| Gender | Both |
| Ages | 18 Years and older |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No |
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| Location Countries ICMJE | United States, Canada, Israel, Italy, Russian Federation |
| Administrative Information | |
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00656305 |
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | BM004 |
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Not Provided |
| Responsible Party | InSightec |
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | InSightec |
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Investigators ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Information Provided By | InSightec |
| Verification Date | September 2012 |
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|