Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Lumbar Stenosis Outcomes Research II (LUSTORII)
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Study NCT00652093   Information provided by University of Rochester
First Received: March 11, 2008   Last Updated: November 10, 2009   History of Changes

March 11, 2008
November 10, 2009
March 2008
March 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Time to first symptoms (Tfirst) on the treadmill walking test. [ Time Frame: 1.5 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00652093 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Area under the curve of present pain intensity with ambulation at each cued time point [ Time Frame: Every 30 seconds for a maximum of 15 minutes ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Walking tolerance as measured by time and distance walked on the treadmill walking test [ Time Frame: 1.5 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • BPI Interference Measure [ Time Frame: 0 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Time to return to baseline pain level after the treadmill ambulation assessment (Trecovery) [ Time Frame: 15 minutes ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Adverse events (decrease in respiratory rate, sedation, constipation, low blood, nausea and vomiting, or itching graded on a 0-3 scale (0:none, 1:mild, 2:moderate, 3:severe.) [ Time Frame: 6 Months - 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Patient Global Impression of Change [ Time Frame: 0 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Oswestry Disability Index score, Swiss Spinal Stenosis score, Patient Global Impression of Change, and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. [ Time Frame: 15 min ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
 
Lumbar Stenosis Outcomes Research II
Lumbar Stenosis Outcomes Research II: Opana IR Versus Placebo and Active Control for the Treatment of Walking Impairment in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized, Cross-Over Trial

The primary objective of the proposed pilot study is to determine the efficacy of oxymorphone hydrochloride and propoxyphene/acetaminophen combination in prolonging the time to onset of pain and reducing the severity of pain associated with walking in patients with neurogenic intermittent claudication. The secondary objective is to examine the functional benefit of oxymorphone hydrochloride and propoxyphene/acetaminophen combination with respect to improvement in duration and distance of walking tolerance.

The proposed study will also provide the foundation for a treadmill-based methodology for assessing the analgesic efficacy of drugs for low back pain provoked by standing and walking associated with lumbar spinal stenosis.

 
Phase IV
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator), Crossover Assignment
Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication
  • Drug: Placebo
  • Drug: Propoxyphene/acetaminophen
  • Drug: oxymorphone hydrochloride
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo
  • Active Comparator: Darvocet & Opana

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
48
 
March 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must present with clinical symptoms of neurogenic claudication (exercise induced leg pain, numbness, heaviness, or vague discomfort in part or all of one or both legs provoked with walking and standing and relieved by sitting, squatting, or forward flexion posturing) and endorse limitation of walking tolerance due to these symptoms
  • Leg/low back pain ratio must be greater than 50:50
  • Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain ≥ 6 in response to the following question: "Circle one number (from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain) - How would you rate the worst leg and lower back pain you experienced during walking last week?"
  • Patients must have confirmatory imaging by MRI or CT scan demonstrating at least one level of lumbar spinal stenosis within 1 year
  • Duration of symptoms > 3 months
  • Age > 50 years; male or female

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Past or present existence of a movement disorder, e.g., Parkinsonism, or an neurologic disease that might affect the ability to ambulate (e.g., signs/symptoms of cauda equina compression)
  • Cognitive impairment preventing full understanding or participation in the study
  • Peripheral vascular disease
  • Moderate to severe arthritis of the knee or hip that might severely compromise ambulation
  • Past or present lower extremity peripheral vascular disease
  • Serious concomitant medical illness (e.g., heart disease) that might impair ambulation assessment
  • Previous lumbar surgery for spinal stenosis (laminectomy with or without fusion) within the past 2 years or epidural steroid injection in the preceding 4 months.
  • Severe psychiatric disorder
  • Mean time to severe symptoms > 15 minutes.
  • Epidural steroid treatment within the last three months
  • History of drug or alcohol dependence
  • Serious intercurrent illness
  • Hypersensitivity to oxymorphone hydrochloride
  • Hypersensitivity to propoxyphene or acetaminophen
  • Severe bronchial asthma or hypercarbia, morphine analogs such as codeine, or any of the other ingredients of Opana
  • Suspicion of paralytic ileus
  • Moderate or severe hepatic impairment
  • Major conduction abnormality on ECG or cardiac (Bruce protocol) stress test within the past year.
  • Ongoing treatment with a long-acting opioid or regularly-scheduled use of a short acting opioid (>3 doses/day on four or more days/week).
Both
50 Years and older
No
Contact: Nicole Murray 585-340-8928 nicole_murray@urmc.rochester.edu
United States
 
NCT00652093
John D. Markman, M.D., Director, Tanslational Pain Research
20957
University of Rochester
Endo Pharmaceuticals
Principal Investigator: John D Markman, M.D. University of Rochester
University of Rochester
November 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP