Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Phase 3 Multicenter Comparative Study to Confirm Safety and Effectiveness of the F(ab)2 Antivenom Anavip.
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Study NCT00636116   Information provided by Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V.
First Received: March 11, 2008   Last Updated: November 12, 2009   History of Changes

March 11, 2008
November 12, 2009
May 2008
November 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Incidence rate of patients experiencing coagulopathy during the follow-up phase of the study. Absolute Platelet levels < 150,000/mm3. Absolute Fibrinogen levels < 150 mg/dL. Clinical coagulopathy requiring additional antivenom. [ Time Frame: Study Day 5 (±/- 1 day), Study Day 8 (±/- 1 day) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00636116 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Comparison between groups of: Percentage of patients who experience venonemia. Absolute platelet level measured Lowest absolute platelet level measured Absolute fibrinogen level Lowest absolute fibrinogen level [ Time Frame: Study Day 5 (+/- 1 day) and Study Day 8 (+/- 1 day) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
 
Phase 3 Multicenter Comparative Study to Confirm Safety and Effectiveness of the F(ab)2 Antivenom Anavip.
A Comparison of Anavip® and CroFab® in the Treatment of Patients With Crotalinae Envenomation: A Randomized, Prospective, Blinded, Controlled, Comparative, Multicenter Study

The purpose of this study is to establish if F(ab)2 antivenom (Anavip) is safe for crotalinae envenomation. Confirm its effectiveness in preventing the occurrence of delayed coagulopathies and compare the safety and efficacy with Fab antivenom (CroFab) in patients with Crotalinae envenomation.

Fewer than 200,000 crotaline envenomations occur annually in the US.Crotaline venoms contain a broad variety of toxins, venom variability and injection quantity among individual snakes and across species result in broadly variable patient presentations. Clinical consequences of crotaline envenomation include local and systemic effects, both of which may progress for hours to days.The best studied systemic consequence is coagulopathy, which may in its complexity mimic disseminated intravascular coagulation. Platelet and clotting disorders respond rapidly to administration of polyvalent antivenom.

Crotaline viper envenomation in the United States is treated with one of two licensed products: Wyeth Antivenin (Crotalidae) Polyvalent (Polyvalent), or CroFab® (antivenin Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab, ovine). In recent years, both of these products have been in critically short supply. Use of Wyeth Polyvalent has been associated with a greater than 75% incidence of adverse reactions, including acute type 1 and delayed type 2 immune reactions.These phenomena are an inherent risk in the use of whole immunoglobulin. CroFab´s low molecular weight creates a pharmacokinetic mismatch with crotaline venom which leds to a recurrent venom effects.

Anavip is pharmacologically and pharmacokinetically different.Because of the elimination of the Fc portion of the immunoglobulin molecule, Anavip is expected to produce far fewer adverse reactions than seen with whole immunoglobulin antivenoms and unlike Fab molecules, F(ab)2 molecules exceed the size threshold for renal clearance and thus are expected to remain in circulation for a significantly longer time and substantially reduce the incidence of recurrent coagulopathy.

Phase III
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Snake Bite
  • Biological: Crotalinae (pit viper) equine immune F(ab)2
  • Biological: Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab, ovine
  • Experimental: Anavip with Anavip Maintenance Therapy
  • Experimental: Anavip with Placebo Maintenance Therapy
  • Active Comparator: CroFab with CroFab Maintenance Therapy
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
93
March 2010
November 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women 2 to 80 years of age
  • Presenting for emergency treatment of pit viper bite
  • Informed consent document read and signed by patient (or parent/legal guardian)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current use of any antivenom, or use within the last month
  • Current participation in a clinical drug study, or participation within the last month
  • Positive urine or blood pregnancy test at screening
  • Breast-feeding
  • Allergy to horse serum, sheep serum, or papaya
  • Underlying medical conditions that significantly alter platelet count or fibrinogen; thrombocytopenia, hemophilia, familial dysfibrinogenemia, leukemia
  • Use of any medication expected to affect platelet count, coagulation factors or fibrinogen: chemotherapeutic agents, warfarin, heparin
  • No clinical indications of snake bite requiring antivenom for treatment
Both
2 Years to 80 Years
No
Contact: Walter García, MD (5255)54883700 ext 3785 wgarcia@silanes.com.mx
Contact: Charles Perry (615)4147270 cperry@raretx.com
United States
 
NCT00636116
Walter García Ubbelohde, Clinical Research Manager, Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V.
YA-07/02
Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V.
  • Instituto de Biotecnologia,UNAM, Cuernavaca Mexico
  • University of Arizona
Principal Investigator: Alejandro Alagon Cano, PhD Instituto de Biotecnología UNAM
Study Director: Walter García Ubbelohde, MD Instituto Bioclon
Principal Investigator: Leslie Boyer, MD Viper Institute, UoA
Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V.
November 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP