Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, and Vinorelbine As Second-Line Therapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer That Did Not Respond to Hormone Therapy
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Study NCT00627354   Information provided by National Cancer Institute (NCI)
First Received: February 29, 2008   Last Updated: July 7, 2009   History of Changes

February 29, 2008
July 7, 2009
September 2006
September 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Palliative response rate [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00627354 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Duration of palliative response [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Biological response [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Tumor response as assessed by RECIST criteria [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Time to progression [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Overall survival [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Quality of life as assessed by QLQ-PR25 [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Impact on autonomy in patients > 70 years of age [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Toxicity [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
 
Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, and Vinorelbine As Second-Line Therapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer That Did Not Respond to Hormone Therapy
Phase 2 Randomized Study Evaluating 3 Chemotherapy Regimens as Second-Line Treatment in Patients With Hormone-Refractory Metastatic Prostate Cancer

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as mitoxantrone, etoposide, and vinorelbine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known which drug is more effective in killing tumor cells.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying how well mitoxantrone works compared to etoposide or vinorelbine works as second-line therapy in treating patients with metastatic prostate cancer that did not respond to hormone therapy.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Determine the palliative response rate in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer treated with mitoxantrone hydrochloride vs etoposide vs vinorelbine ditartrate as second-line therapy.

Secondary

  • Determine the duration of palliative response in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Determine the biological response (PSA > 50%) in these patients.
  • Determine the time to progression (biological and clinical) in these patients.
  • Determine the overall survival of these patients.
  • Determine the quality of life and the impact on autonomy of patients over 70 years of age.
  • Determine the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.

  • Arm I: Patients receive mitoxantrone hydrochloride IV over 5 minutes once a week for 3 weeks.
  • Arm II: Patients receive oral etoposide twice daily on days 1-14.
  • Arm III: Patients receive oral vinorelbine ditartrate once daily on days 1 and 8 and oral prednisone once daily on days 1-21.

Treatment in all three arms repeats every 3 weeks for up to 9 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Phase II
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized
Prostate Cancer
  • Drug: etoposide
  • Drug: mitoxantrone hydrochloride
  • Drug: prednisone
  • Drug: vinorelbine ditartrate
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
90
 
September 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate

    • Metastatic progressive disease meeting the following criteria:

      • Increase in measurable lesions > 25%
      • Increase in bone lesions > 25%
      • Biological progression rate of PSA > 4 ng/mL
  • Received docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy
  • Received at least 1 prior regimen of hormone therapy
  • Pain > 2 on Visual Analog Scale or continuing level 2 analgesics
  • No symptomatic or evolutionary CNS disease

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • ANC ≥ 1,500/mm³
  • Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³
  • Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times normal
  • Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2 times normal (unless bone metastases are present)
  • Transaminases ≤ 1.5 times normal
  • Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times normal
  • No prior malignancy except basal cell skin cancer
  • No peripheral neuropathy or severe neuropathy ≥ grade 2
  • No other severe lung, hepatic, renal, or digestive disease that would be complicated by treatment
  • LVEF > 50%
  • No history of peptic ulcer, unstable diabetes, or other contraindication to using steroids
  • No severe infection requiring antibiotics

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • More than 8 weeks since prior metabolic radiotherapy
  • More than 4 weeks since prior external radiotherapy
  • At least 1 month since prior docetaxel-based chemotherapy
  • At least 1 month since prior antiandrogen therapy in the case of complete hormonal blockage
  • No participation in another clinical trial within the past 30 days
Male
18 Years and older
No
 
France
 
NCT00627354
 
CDR0000574184, GETUG- P02, INCA-RECF0422, EUDRACT-2006-001597-25
Groupe D'Etude des Tumeurs Uro-Genitales
 
Study Chair: Florence Joly, MD, PhD Centre Francois Baclesse
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
July 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP