Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing Lorazepam and Diazepam for Children in the Emergency Department With Seizures
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Study NCT00621478   Information provided by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
First Received: February 20, 2008   Last Updated: May 26, 2009   History of Changes

February 20, 2008
May 26, 2009
February 2008
January 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
cessation of convulsions within 10 minutes of the initial administration of the study drug and a sustained absence of convulsions for 30 minutes from the initial administration of the study drug. [ Time Frame: 30 minutes ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00621478 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • To determine population pharmacokinetics (PK) of lorazepam using sparse sampling. [ Time Frame: 24 hr ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • feasibility of identifying patients for informed consent prior to arrival in status epilepticus for a randomized controlled trial [ Time Frame: 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • the experience of community consultation and public disclosure [ Time Frame: 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • feasibility of enrolling pediatric patients under an exception from informed consent [ Time Frame: 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • determine patients' and parents' attitudes and reactions to an exception from informed consent approach [ Time Frame: 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • severe or life-threatening respiratory depression [ Time Frame: 4 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • To determine population pharmacokinetics (PK) of lorazepam using sparse sampling. [ Time Frame: 24 hr ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • feasibility of identifying patients for informed consent prior to arrival in status epilepticus for a randomized controlled trial [ Time Frame: 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • the experience of community consultation and public disclosure [ Time Frame: 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • feasibility of enrolling pediatric patients under an exception from informed consent [ Time Frame: 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • determine patients' and parents' attitudes and reactions to an exception from informed consent approach [ Time Frame: 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
 
Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing Lorazepam and Diazepam for Children in the Emergency Department With Seizures
Use Of Lorazepam For The Treatment Of Pediatric Status Epilepticus: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Trial Of Lorazepam And Diazepam

Children with seizures are frequently seen in the emergency department. The drug lorazepam, which is commonly used, is not labeled by the US Food and Drug Administration for children for this use. The FDA, under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, has requested that a study comparing diazepam, a drug that is labeled by the FDA for this indication, with lorazepam be performed. The study will show whether one drug is more effective and safe than the other.

Textbooks and expert opinion recommend both diazepam and lorazepam as initial therapy for children in status epilepticus (SE) and provide recommended doses that are commonly used. However, unlike diazepam, lorazepam is only FDA-approved for treatment for SE in patients over 18 years of age. Despite this fact, many experts support the use of lorazepam over diazepam in pediatric SE. Increased duration of action, increased effectiveness in terminating SE, and a lower incidence of respiratory depression have been cited as potential advantages of lorazepam over diazepam. However, data to support firm recommendations for one medication over another are lacking. Thus, either diazepam (FDA-approved) or lorazepam can be considered first-line agents for pediatric SE, and the physician's choice of agent depends on local practice patterns and individual treatment styles. In the prehospital (Emergency Medical Services) setting, diazepam is commonly chosen because of a longer shelf life without refrigeration.

The purpose of this study is to determine the differences in efficacy and safety between these two commonly used benzodiazepines, as requested by the FDA under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, using the Exception from Informed Consent provided by the FDA.

Phase II, Phase III
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Status Epilepticus
Drug: lorazepam or diazepam
  • Active Comparator:

    Cohort 1 (preconsented) patients will involve obtaining informed consent from the legally authorized representative of a potential study subject before they present to the ED in SE. Patient assent will be obtained for patients as per local IRB rules. The consent document (enclosed in this application) will inform parents that if their child comes to the ED and qualifies for the study based on study inclusion/exclusion criteria, they will be enrolled.

    Patients who cannot be contacted to confirm consent will be enrolled in Cohort 2 (EFIC) as detailed below.

    Patients in Cohort 1 will be randomized in a blinded fashion to either lorazepam 0.1 mg/kg or diazepam 0.2 mg/kg

  • Active Comparator:

    Cohort 2 (EFIC) will include patients who appear in the ED with SE and qualify for the study but have not given prior consent. These patients will be enrolled under the EFIC regulations. The parent/guardian will be given the opportunity to object to participation or ask additional questions.

    The child will be enrolled (dosed) with study medication under an EFIC. Once the child is stabilized, a research staff member will approach the parent or LAR to obtain informed consent to continue the child's participation in the study. If a parent or LAR refuses continued participation, then no further study procedures will be performed. Safety and data will be collected in accordance with federal regulations.

    Cohort 2 will be randomized, like Cohort 1, to either lorazepam 0.1 mg/kg or diazepam 0.2 mg/kg

 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
240
January 2011
January 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Generalized tonic-clonic status epilepticus, defined as one or more if the following:

    1. Three or more generalized tonic-clonic seizures within the last hour and currently experiencing a convulsion; or
    2. Two or more generalized tonic-clonic seizures in succession with no recovery of consciousness between seizures and currently experiencing a convulsion; or
    3. A single ongoing generalized tonic-clonic seizure of at least 5 minutes duration

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnancy Shock prior to study drug (sustained hypotension requiring inotropic therapy); Significant dysrhythmia prior to study drug (other than sinus tachycardia); Need for emergent surgical intervention and general anesthesia for a condition present prior to study drug; Known sensitivity to benzodiazepines or known contraindication to benzodiazepine use; or Use of diazepam or lorazepam within 1 week of presentation.

Both
3 Months to 17 Years
No
Contact: James Chamberlain, MD 202-476-3253 jchamber@cnmc.org
United States
 
NCT00621478
Jim Chamberlain, MD/ Principal Investigator, Children's National Medical Center
N01HD043393, 275200403393C
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
 
Principal Investigator: James Chamberlain, MD Children's Research Institute
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
May 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP