Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Treosulfan Based Conditioning Prior to Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) (AlloTreo)
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Study NCT00598624   Information provided by IRCCS San Raffaele
First Received: January 10, 2008   Last Updated: August 10, 2009   History of Changes

January 10, 2008
August 10, 2009
September 2005
December 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Efficacy: Evaluation of engraftment [ Time Frame: 28 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Safety: Evaluation of the incidence of CTC grade 3 and 4 adverse events [ Time Frame: between day -6 and day +28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00598624 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Efficacy: Evaluation of disease free survival (DFS) [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Efficacy: Evaluation of overall survival (OS) [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Efficacy: Evaluation of relapse incidence (RI) [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Efficacy: Documentation of donor chimerism [ Time Frame: on day +28, +56 and +100 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Safety: Evaluation of incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) [ Time Frame: on day +28 and day +100 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Safety: cumulative incidence of NRM [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Safety: Evaluation of cumulative incidence and severity of acute and chronic graft vs. host disease (GvHD) [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Safety: EBV reactivation [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
 
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Treosulfan Based Conditioning Prior to Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
Clinical Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Treosulfan Based Conditioning Prior to Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Haematological Malignancies

This is a multicentric, non-randomized, non-controlled open-label phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of treosulfan in a combination regimen with fludarabine as conditioning therapy prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients with haematological malignancies.

The aim is to demonstrate a clinical benefit compared with historical data on intravenous busulfan (BusulfexTM, BusilvexTM), the only drug so far registered in the indication conditioning before allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

 
Phase II
Interventional
Treatment, Non-Randomized, Open Label, Uncontrolled, Single Group Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
  • Leukemia
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
  • Myelodysplastic Syndrome
  • Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma
  • Hodgkin Lymphoma
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
  • Multiple Myeloma
Drug: Treosulfan IV
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
175
December 2010
December 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with haematological malignancies, according to WHO classification, such as:

    • acute myeloid leukaemia -AML- in CR1 except "low-risk cases" defined by t(15;17), t(8;21), inv 16 or normal cytogenetics at diagnosis with FLT3-ITD negative and NPM-1 positive, with no high risk clinical criteria
    • any AML beyond CR1
    • acute lymphoblast leukaemia -ALL- in CR1 only if at "high risk" defined by cytogenetics as t(9;22), t(4;11) or for persistence of minimal residual disease (MRD)
    • any ALL beyond CR1
    • chronic myeloid leukaemia -CML- in chronic phase (CP) or accelerated phase (AP) intolerant/not responsive to TK-inhibitors
    • myeloproliferative disorders -MPD-
    • myelodysplastic syndrome -MDS- with intermediate or high risk International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)
    • diffuse large cell lymphoma -DLCL- with a chemosensitive relapse or beyond CR1
    • lymphoblastic and Burkitt lymphoma with a chemosensitive relapse or beyond CR1
    • mantle cell lymphoma -MCL- with a chemosensitive relapse or beyond CR1
    • follicular lymphoma -FCL- with a chemosensitive relapse or beyond CR2
    • Hodgkin lymphoma -HD- with a chemosensitive relapse or beyond CR1
    • chronic lymphocytic leukaemia -CLL- at "poor risk" in CR1 or with a chemosensitive relapse
    • CLL relapsing after high dose chemotherapy
    • T-cell non Hodgkin lymphoma -T-NHL- in CR1 or beyond
    • multiple myeloma -MM- at high risk for cytogenetics or ISS stage 3 in CR1 following high dose chemotherapy
    • MM at any relapse/progression except refractory disease
  2. Availability of an HLA-identical sibling donor (MRD) or HLA-identical unrelated donor (MUD)

    • HLA-identity defined by the following markers: A, B, DRB1, DQB1 or a single or double Cord Blood unit (CB) with at least a 4 out of 6 HLA-matching by the following markers: A, B and DRB.

    A) identity between the 2 CB units and the recipient;

    B) Two identical CB units with one or two mismatches with the recipient;

    C) Two CB units with one mismatch between them and two mismatches with the recipient. We will prefer mismatches either for class I or for class II antigens; we will avoid mismatches concerning both classes I and II together.

  3. Target graft size (unmanipulated, preferably not cryopreserved)

    • bone marrow: 2 to 10 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg BW recipient or > 2 x 108 nucleated cells/kg BW recipient or
    • peripheral blood: 4 to 10 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg BW recipient
  4. Age > 18 and < 70 years
  5. Karnofsky Index > 80 %
  6. Adequate contraception in female patients of child-bearing potential
  7. Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Secondary malignancies
  2. Previous allogeneic transplantation
  3. Hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index > 4 (HCT-CI Sorror et al, Appendix M)
  4. Known and manifested malignant involvement of the CNS
  5. Active infectious disease
  6. HIV- positivity or active hepatitis infection
  7. Impaired liver function (Bilirubin > upper normal limit; Transaminases > 3.0 x upper normal limit)
  8. Impaired renal function (Creatinine-clearance < 60 ml/min; Serum Creatinine > 1.5 x upper normal limit).
  9. Pleural effusion or ascites > 1.0 L
  10. Pregnancy or lactation
  11. Known hypersensitivity to treosulfan and/or fludarabine
  12. Participation in another experimental drug trial within 4 weeks before day -6
  13. Non-co-operative behaviour or non-compliance
  14. Psychiatric diseases or conditions that might impair the ability to give informed consent
Both
18 Years to 69 Years
No
Contact: Luciano LC Callegaro, Monitor +390226433903 callegaro.luciano@hsr.it
Contact: Stefania ST Trinca, Data Manager +390226433903 trinca.stefania@hsr.it
Italy
 
NCT00598624
Fabio Ciceri, MD, IRCCS San Raffaele
2005-005182-11
IRCCS San Raffaele
 
Study Director: Fabio FC Ciceri, MD Unaffiliated
IRCCS San Raffaele
August 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP