Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Efficacy and Safety Study of Nasalfent for Treatment of Breakthrough Cancer Pain in Patients Taking Regular Opioids
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00589823   Information provided by Archimedes Development Ltd
First Received: December 27, 2007   Last Updated: January 20, 2010   History of Changes

December 27, 2007
January 20, 2010
June 2007
March 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Pain Relief [ Time Frame: Various time points ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00589823 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Pain Relief at various time points [ Time Frame: Various time points ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
 
Efficacy and Safety Study of Nasalfent for Treatment of Breakthrough Cancer Pain in Patients Taking Regular Opioids
A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Two-Phase Crossover Study of Fentanyl Citrate Nasal Spray Compared to Immediate Release Morphine Sulphate in the Treatment of BTCP in Subjects Taking Regular Opioid Therapy

Cancer patients taking regular medication for their pain often still have episodes of severe pain that 'break through' despite their background pain treatment. Fentanyl is a strong, short-acting painkiller often used to treat this 'breakthrough' pain. Nasalfent contains fentanyl in a patented drug delivery system called PecSys and is given via a simple nasal spray. This study will test the efficacy and safety of Nasalfent compared to Immediate Release Morphine Sulphate in the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain.

Current treatments for breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP)work too slowly to meet the fast onset of most BTCP episodes, they continue to act longer than the episode of pain lasts and so can have unwanted side effects due to this 'over treatment' of the pain episode. In addition many cancer patients have oral problems which make taking pain relief medication by mouth uncomfortable for the patient. Nasalfent is administered via the nose as a simple spray and can be taken by patients or given by their carers. The nasal route is a common way to administer medication for example in the treatment of migraine or allergy. At any time during the study the patient may take their regular treatment for BTCP should they so wish.

This study will compare the time of onset and degree of pain relief of Nasalfent to that of Immediate Release Morphine Sulphate. The safety of the two treatment options will also be examined.

Phase III
Interventional
Allocation:  Randomized
Control:  Active Control
Endpoint Classification:  Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model:  Crossover Assignment
Masking:  Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:  Supportive Care
Cancers, Pain
  • Drug: Fentanyl citrate
    nasal spray, 100, 200, 400 or 800 mcg dosage according to need, to treat up to four episodes of BTCP per day
    Other Names:
    • FCNS
    • Nasalfent
  • Drug: Immediate release morphine sulphate
    drug dose as required by patient taken to treat up to four epsiodes of BTCP per day
    Other Name: IRMS
  • 1: Active Comparator
    Immediate Release Morphine sulphate capsules taken at start of relevant BTCP episode. Each episode treated with either this medication OR the experimental comparator.
    Intervention: Drug: Fentanyl citrate
  • 2: Experimental
    Nasalfent spray taken at start of relevant BTCP episode. Each episode to be treated with either this medication OR the active comparator (IRMS)
    Intervention: Drug: Immediate release morphine sulphate
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Completed
135
March 2009
March 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able and willing to give consent
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a) negative urine pregnancy test b) not be breast feeding c) agree to practice a reliable form of contraception
  • Diagnosis of cancer
  • Taking at least 60mg oral morphine or equivalent as 24 hour treatment for cancer-related pain
  • Experiencing on average 1 - 4 episodes of breakthrough cancer pain per day usually controlled by rescue pain medication
  • Able (or via caregiver) to evaluate and record pain relief, assess medication performance at set times after dosing, record adverse events, record each use of the study drug or rescue medication in a diary
  • Able to be up and about for 50% of the day or greater

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intolerance to opioids or fentanyl
  • rapidly increasing/uncontrolled pain
  • pain that is not cancer-related
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United Kingdom
 
NCT00589823
Mark Watling, Group Medical Director, Archimedes Development Ltd
CPO44/06/FCNS
Archimedes Development Ltd
 
Principal Investigator: Marie Fallon Western General Hospital, Edinburgh Cancer Centre
Archimedes Development Ltd
January 2010

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP