Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Rhinogenic Headache Improvement After Nasal Operation (RHINO)
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Study NCT00580307   Information provided by University of Missouri-Columbia
First Received: December 12, 2007   Last Updated: February 24, 2009   History of Changes

December 12, 2007
February 24, 2009
December 2007
May 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Between-group difference in patient-rated headache improvement at 10 days, 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-intervention, as measured by a validated questionnaire, the Headache Impact Test - 6 (HIT-6™). [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Between-group difference in patient-rated headache improvement at 10 days, 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-intervention, as measured by a validated questionnaire, the Headache Impact Test - 6 (HIT-6™) [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00580307 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Between-group differences in subject responses to a non-validated questionnaire so as to permit comparison with previous studies. Additionally, headache medication use will be examined as a secondary end-point. [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
 
Rhinogenic Headache Improvement After Nasal Operation
Surgical Correction of Contact Point Headaches - Randomized Controlled Trial. [Rhinogenic Headache Improvement After Nasal Operation] Trial

Objective: To determine the efficacy of surgical correction of intranasal mucosal contact points in improving quality of life and decreasing medication use in patients with rhinogenic headaches.

Significance: Chronic, debilitating headaches that resist maximal medical treatment by various headache specialists are sometimes linked to structural anomalies within the nose that exert pressure on apposing mucosal surfaces. A number of otolaryngologists have reported success in alleviating rhinogenic headaches with contact point correction surgery. This practice is supported by anecdotal reports along with retrospective and observational studies; however, a prospective study with an appropriate surgical control group has not been conducted. Because the specific effect of contact point correction has not yet been differentiated from the placebo effect of surgery itself, many headache specialists are reluctant to recommend surgical evaluation for their patients. To demonstrate the efficacy of contact point correction surgery to both the headache and otolaryngology communities - and thus, to make this treatment option more widely available to rhinogenic headache sufferers - a randomized controlled trial is needed.

 
 
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Placebo Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
  • Rhinogenic Headache
  • Contact Point Headache
  • Procedure: Septoplasty
  • Procedure: Septoplasty and endoscopic contact point correction
  • Placebo Comparator: Septoplasty only
  • Experimental: Septoplasty and endoscopic contact point correction
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
60
June 2010
May 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic (> 2 months) pain or pressure over nasal bridge, glabella, or forehead
  • Unilateral or bilateral nasal septal deviation that is chronically symptomatic (e.g. nasal airway obstruction)
  • Failure of standard medical therapy for headache
  • Symptomatic contact points as demonstrated by physical examination, sinus CT and nasal endoscopy
  • Relief of headache after application of topical anesthetic to contact points
  • Contact points that remain after mucosal decongestion
  • Absence of any other obvious cause of headaches after a thorough evaluation by a neurologist, ophthalmologist, dentist, internist, or other related specialist

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous sinonasal surgery
  • Active acute sinonasal disease:

    1. Seasonal allergic exacerbations with mucosal swelling
    2. Acute infectious rhino-sinusitis
  • Chronic sinonasal problems:

    1. Severe nasal polyps mimicking contact points
    2. Mucoceles protruding from sinuses into nasal cavity
    3. Nasal and sinus tumors
  • General medical condition that precludes elective surgery (including pregnancy)
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact: Matthew P Page, MD 573-882-8173 pagemp@health.missouri.edu
Contact: Alvis L Barrier, MD 573-882-7129 barriera@health.missouri.edu
United States
 
NCT00580307
Matthew P. Page, M.D. (Principal investigator), Dept. of OtoHNS, University of Missouri - Columbia
1089377
University of Missouri-Columbia
 
Principal Investigator: Matthew P Page, MD Dept. OtoHNS, U. Missouri - Columbia
Study Director: Alvis L Barrier, MD Dept. OtoHNS, U. Missouri- Columbia
Study Chair: Karen H Calhoun, MD, FACS Dept. OtoHNS, U. Missouri - Columbia
University of Missouri-Columbia
February 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP