| December 13, 2007 |
| February 27, 2012 |
| June 2007 |
| Not Provided |
- Time to hemostasis and time to ambulation. [ Time Frame: at time introducer sheath is removed ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Combined rate of the following SAEs:Vascular injury or repair; access site bleeding, infection, nerve injury; ipsilateral lower extremity ischemia. [ Time Frame: 30 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
|
| Same as current |
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00574691 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
- Device success. [ Time Frame: initial hemostasis time ≤ 5 minutes and removal of the intact delivery system ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Procedural success. [ Time Frame: 30 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Time the patient is deemed eligible for hospital discharge. [ Time Frame: time of the access site closure until patient is discharge ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Rebleeding following initial hemostasis requiring a subsequent intervention. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Pseudoaneurysm not requiring treatment. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Pseudoaneurysm treated with ultrasound-guided thrombin injection or ultrasound-guided fibrin adhesive injection. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Arteriovenous fistula documented by ultrasound or CT scan. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Access site hematoma ≥ 6 cm. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Post-hospital discharge access site-related bleeding. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Access site-related bleeding requiring > 30 minutes to achieve hemostasis. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Ipsilateral lower extremity arterial emboli. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Transient loss of ipsilateral lower extremity pulse. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Access site-related vessel laceration. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Transient access site-related nerve injury [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Access site wound dehiscence. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Localized access site infection treated with oral antibiotics. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Retroperitoneal bleeding. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Ipsilateral peripheral artery total occlusion. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Ecchymosis ≥ 6 cm. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Intraluminal plug delivery not requiring surgical intervention. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Decrease in pedal pulse. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Death. [ Time Frame: prior to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
|
| Combined rate of the following SAEs:Vascular injury or repair; access site bleeding, infection, nerve injury; ipsilateral lower extremity ischemia. [ Time Frame: 30 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] |
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| |
| ECLIPSE Feasibility Trial (Ensure's Vascular Closure Device Speeds Hemostasis Trial) EU |
| ECLIPSE Feasibility Trial (Ensure's Vascular Closure Device Speeds Hemostasis) Trial |
To assess the safety and feasibility of the 7F Ensure Medical Vascular Closure Devices to facilitate hemostasis in patients undergoing diagnostic or interventional procedures. |
Multi-center (up to 6 European sites), non-blinded, non-randomized, feasibility study with a 2-month enrollment period and 30-day clinical follow-up.
60 patients (plus up to 36 "roll-in" device training patients) undergoing diagnostic or interventional coronary or peripheral procedures utilizing a 7F arterial puncture in the common femoral artery. Patients are excluded if they have a previous target artery closure with any closure device, recent myocardial infarction or thrombolytic therapy, treatment with thrombin-specific anticoagulants or low molecular weight heparin, fluoroscopically visible calcium or atherosclerosis ≤ 1 cm of puncture site, or planned target site access ≤ 30 days. |
| Interventional |
| Phase 1 |
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
- Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary
- Coronary Arteriosclerosis
|
| Device: 7F Ensure Medical Vascular Closure Device
Vascular Closure Device
Other Name: Ensure Medical Vascular Closure Device |
| 1
Vascular Closure Device
Intervention: Device: 7F Ensure Medical Vascular Closure Device |
| Wiemer M, Langer C, Fichtlscherer S, Firschke C, Hofbauer F, Lins M, Haude M, Debèfve C, Stoll HP, Hanefeld C. First-in-man experience with a new 7F vascular closure device (EXOSEAL™): the 7F ECLIPSE study. J Interv Cardiol. 2012 Oct;25(5):518-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2012.00739.x. Epub 2012 Jul 5. PubMed PMID: 22762417. |
| |
| Completed |
| 93 |
| October 2007 |
| Not Provided
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient is between 18 and 85 years of age
- Patient/legal representative provides written informed consent
- Patient is scheduled for a coronary or peripheral diagnostic or interventional procedure
- Patient is able to undergo emergent vascular surgery if a complication related to the VCD necessitates such surgery
- Patient has a 7F arterial puncture located in the common femoral artery
- Target vessel has a lumen diameter ≥ 5 mm
- Patient is willing and able to complete follow-up
- Catheterization procedure is planned and elective
Exclusion Criteria:
- Arterial puncture in the femoral artery of both legs
- Prior target artery closure with any closure device or closure with manual compression ≤ 30 days prior to the cardiac or peripheral catheterization procedure
- Patients with a history of significant bleeding or with any known or documented bleeding disorders, such as Thrombocytopenia (with < 100,000 platelet count), Von Willebrand's disease, anemia (Hgb < 10 g/dL, Hct < 30%), thrombasthenia, decreased fibrinogen (< 200 mg/dL), and Factor V deficiency
- Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction ≤ 48 hours prior to the cardiac or peripheral catheterization procedure
- Uncontrolled hypertension (BP ≥ 180/110 mmHg)
- Heparinized patients with elevated pre-closure ACT level:> 250 seconds with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor > 300 seconds no GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor
- Patient is ineligible for in-lab catheterization lab introducer sheath removal
- Concurrent participation in another investigational device or drug trial
- Thrombolytic therapy (e.g. streptokinase, urokinase, t-PA) ≤ 24 hours prior to the cardiac or peripheral catheterization procedure
- Angiomax (bivalirudin) or other thrombin-specific anticoagulants or low molecular weight heparin ≤ 24 hours prior to the cardiac or peripheral catheterization procedure
- Evidence of a preexisting hematoma, arteriovenous fistula, or pseudoaneurysm at the access site prior to start of femoral artery closure procedure
- Prior femoral vascular surgery or vascular graft in region of access site or contralateral common femoral artery
- The targeted femoral artery is tortuous or requires an introducer sheath length > 11 cm
- Fluoroscopically visible calcium, atherosclerotic disease, or stent ≤ 1 cm of the puncture site that would interfere with the placement of the VCD's plug
- Difficulty in obtaining vascular access resulting in multiple arterial punctures and/or posterior arterial puncture
- Antegrade puncture
- BMI > 40 kg/m2
- Symptomatic leg ischemia in the target vessel limb including severe claudication (< 50 meter) or weak/absent pulse
- Targeted femoral artery diameter stenosis ≥ 50%
- Pre-existing severe non-cardiac systemic disease or pre-existing terminal illness
- Planned arterial access at the same access site ≤ 30 days following the femoral artery closure procedure
- Patient has known allergy to any materials used in the VCD
- Patient is known to require an extended hospitalization (e.g. patient is undergoing CABG surgery)
- Pre-existing systemic or cutaneous infection
- Prior or recent use of an intra-aortic balloon pump through the arterial access site
- Cardiogenic shock (hemodynamic instability requiring intravenous medications or mechanical support) experienced during or immediately post-catheterization
- Patient is unable to ambulate at baseline
- Patient is known or suspected to be pregnant, or is lactating
- Patient has already participated in this trial
- Patient has known allergy to contrast medium
- Patient is unavailable for follow-up
- Any angiographic or clinical evidence that the investigator feels would place the patient at increased risk with the use of the VCD
- Required simultaneous ipsilateral or contralateral venous puncture
|
| Both |
| 18 Years to 85 Years |
| No |
| Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| Germany |
| |
| NCT00574691 |
| EM 06-01EU |
| Yes |
| Dr. Hans-Peter Stoll - Director Clinical Affairs, Cordis |
| Cordis Corporation |
| Not Provided
| Principal Investigator: |
Marcus Wiemer, Dr. |
Herz-und Diabeteszentrum NRW |
|
|
| Cordis Corporation |
| February 2012 |