IMPENDIA- PEN VS Dianeal Only Improved Metabolic Control In Diabetic CAPD and APD Patients (Impendia)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00567398
First received: December 4, 2007
Last updated: August 1, 2011
Last verified: August 2011

December 4, 2007
August 1, 2011
April 2008
July 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Change from the baseline value in HbA1c between the PEN group compared to the Dianeal only group [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Change from the baseline value in HbA1c between the PPEN group compared to the DDDD group [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00567398 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Glycemic control medication usage, hypoglycemic events, metabolic control, nutritional status, and QOL. [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
IMPENDIA- PEN VS Dianeal Only Improved Metabolic Control In Diabetic CAPD and APD Patients
Multi-center,Prospective, Randomized Trial ToDemonstrate Improved Metabolic Control of PEN VS Dianeal In Diabetic CAPD and APD Patients - The Impendia Trial

Primary Objective: To demonstrate that use of glucose sparing prescriptions (PEN vs Dianeal) in diabetic (Type 1 and Type 2) Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD)and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (APD) patients leads to improved metabolic control as measured by the magnitude of change from the baseline value in the HbA1c levels.

Secondary Objectives: To demonstrate that use of glucose-sparing PD solutions (PEN vs Dianeal) in diabetic (Type 1 and Type 2) CAPD and APD patients leads to lower glycemic-control medication requirements, decreased incidence of severe hypoglycemic events requiring medical intervention, improved metabolic control, nutritional status, and Quality of Life. In a subgroup of patients, the impact of glucose-sparing PD solutions (PEN vs Dianeal only) on abdominal fat and left ventricular (LV) structure and function will be assessed.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • ESRD
  • Diabetes
  • Drug: Dianeal
    Dianeal 1.5% Dextrose (1.38% Glucose), 2.5% Dextrose (2.27% Glucose), 4.25% Dextrose (3.86% Glucose)
  • Drug: Physioneal
    Physioneal 40 or Physioneal 35
  • Drug: Extraneal
    Extraneal - 7.5% Icodextrin
  • Drug: Nutrineal
    Nutrineal - 1.1% Amino Acids
  • Active Comparator: Dianeal
    Intervention: Drug: Dianeal
  • Experimental: PEN
    Physioneal, Extraneal, Nutrineal
    Interventions:
    • Drug: Physioneal
    • Drug: Extraneal
    • Drug: Nutrineal

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
236
July 2011
July 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. M/F patients 18 years of age or older
  2. Diagnosis of ESRD (GFR ≤ 15 mL/min)
  3. CAPD or APD using only Dianeal and/or Physioneal, at least 1 exchange of 2.5% or 4.25% dextrose/day, no prescribed dry time
  4. DM (Type 1 and 2) on glycemic-control medication, for 90 days
  5. HbA1c > 6.0% but ≤ 12.0%
  6. Blood hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL, but ≤ 13.0 g/dL

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cardiovascular event within the last 90 days
  2. Ongoing clinically significant congestive heart failure (NYHA class III or IV)
  3. Allergy to starch-based polymers
  4. Glycogen storage disease
  5. Glycogen storage disease
  6. Peritonitis, exit-site or tunnel infection treated with antibiotics within last 30 days
  7. Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) ≥ 125 mm Hg, or volume depleted (MAP < 77) at Screening.
  8. Serum urea > 30 mmol/L
  9. Receiving rosiglitazone maleate
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Australia,   Canada,   New Zealand
 
NCT00567398
34202
No
Bruce Culleton, Medical Director, Baxter Healthcare Corporation
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
Not Provided
Study Director: Baxter Healthcare Corporation Call central contact for information
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
August 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP