Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Home-Based Assessment for Alzheimer Disease Prevention (HBA)
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Study NCT00546767   Information provided by National Institute on Aging (NIA)
First Received: October 11, 2007   Last Updated: July 9, 2009   History of Changes

October 11, 2007
July 9, 2009
September 2007
December 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Feasibility Data -- the number of subjects recruited, screened, enrolled, and retained [ Time Frame: 4 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Efficiency Data -- staff time required to successfully complete data collection [ Time Frame: Each experimental visit ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Transition from cognitive health to impairment [ Time Frame: 4 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Method-Specific Adherence, including medication adherence [ Time Frame: 4 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Rate of change in domains of assessment [ Time Frame: 4 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Feasibility Data -- the number of subjects recruited, screened, enrolled, and retained [ Time Frame: 4 years ]
  • Efficiency Data -- staff time required to successfully complete data collection [ Time Frame: Each experimental visit ]
  • Transition from cognitive health to impairment [ Time Frame: 4 years ]
  • Method-Specific Adherence, including medication adherence [ Time Frame: 4 years ]
  • Rate of change in domains of assessment [ Time Frame: 4 years ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00546767 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Research blood samples [ Time Frame: 4 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Safety Assessments: symptom checklist and adverse event checklist [ Time Frame: 4 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Research blood samples [ Time Frame: 4 years ]
  • Safety Assessments: symptom checklist and adverse event checklist [ Time Frame: 4 years ]
 
Home-Based Assessment for Alzheimer Disease Prevention
Multi-Center Trial to Evaluate Home-Based Assessment Methods for Alzheimer Disease Prevention Research in People Over 75 Years Old

The purpose of this study is to evaluate three methods of performing home-based assessments in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) prevention trials. The initial in-person assessment will be done in the clinic or at home.

There is an unmet need for effective, efficient, and economical methods for conducting AD prevention trials. Traditional in-person visits to clinical assessment sites are time consuming and costly and may exclude some people from participation, such as those who are older, or are less mobile or with significant medical illnesses. These may be the people who are at greatest risk for cognitive decline, and also may be without financial resources for services such as transportation to a study site. Prevention trials require long observation periods and these same issues of health, resources, and transportation may cause significant drop out. These obstacles increase expense of clinical trials which require large sample sizes, costly clinical staff and long observation periods. Thus, home-based assessments may lead to more representative recruitment of those most at risk for decline, as well as better retention and reduced study costs.

This is a randomized study of 600 participants, comparing three methods of test administration and data collection. Each enrolled participant will have an In-person (Standard) assessment (in the clinic or at home) prior to baseline.

Participants will be classified as either normal or MCI (Mild Cognitive Impairment) and randomly assigned to an assessment method and to a frequency of assessment. Cognitive performance, self-rated cognitive complaint, functioning in daily life, affective symptoms, global change, quality of life and resource use will all be assessed in each method at each visit. The total time for the at-home assessments will be approximately 45 minutes. In addition, all participants will be provided a multi-vitamin to be taken twice a day, and a measure of medication adherence will be collected for each assessment method.

Changes in certain cognitive measures may "trigger" an in-person assessment, in which participants may change from a categorization of normal or amnestic MCI, to non-amnestic MCI, impaired not MCI, or dementia (i.e., specifically Alzheimer's Disease or another dementia). We estimate that 12% of the study population will trigger over the 4 years of the study and will progress to a more impaired diagnostic category. In addition, a random sample of non-triggered cases (25%) will be selected for an in-person re-assessment during the 4 years of the protocol as a comparison for the trigger group. At the end of the 4-year study period all participants will undergo an in-person evaluation.

 
Interventional
Screening, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
  • Mild Cognitive Impairment
  • Alzheimer's Disease
  • Behavioral: Mail and Live Phone
  • Behavioral: Interactive Voice Response (IVR)
  • Behavioral: Home-based Computer Kiosk
  • Behavioral: Traditional Evaluation Instruments
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
600
December 2011
December 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 75 and older
  • Willing to sign consent
  • Willing to take multi-vitamins provided by the study
  • Minimal computer skills or willingness to learn (as demonstrated by completion during screening of a demonstration module for each arm)
  • English fluency
  • MMSE greater than 26
  • Able to answer and dial a telephone
  • Able to complete the in-person assessment
  • Able to complete the computerized assessment including adequate speech, hearing and vision
  • Independently living adults, defined as living in a setting in which the participant can ensure access to the resources for study procedures
  • Participation of a study partner is desirable and encouraged, but not required

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dementia
  • Use of prescription cognitive-enhancing drugs at entry (e.g. Aricept, Razadyne, Exelon, Namenda)
  • Intent to continue use of own multi-vitamins (for the duration of the study participants must agree to take only study-distributed multi-vitamins)
  • History or presence of major psychiatric, neurological or neurodegenerative conditions associated with significant cognitive impairment such as major stroke, Parkinson's disease, Multiple Sclerosis or Huntington's disease. Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) is acceptable if over 6 months ago
  • Medical conditions associated with life expectancy of less than 5 years
  • Transient domicile interfering with ability to collect study-related data
  • Current participation in a clinical trial involving Central Nervous System (CNS) medications or cognitive testing that would interfere with the current protocol (participation in Uniform Data Set (UDS) assessments by an ADC is permitted)
  • Cohabitation with another participant in this particular study
Both
75 Years and older
Yes
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00546767
Paul Aisen, MD, Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study
IA0123, ADC-030-HBA
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS)
Principal Investigator: Mary Sano, PhD Mount Sinai Medical School
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
July 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP