Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
A Comparison of Surgical Preparations and Wound Infection Rates for Elective Cesarean Sections
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Study NCT00528008   Information provided by Memorial University of Newfoundland
First Received: September 10, 2007   Last Updated: August 26, 2008   History of Changes

September 10, 2007
August 26, 2008
December 2007
November 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
to determine the rate of wound infection using two standard wound preparations: povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate [ Time Frame: within 6 weeks following surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
To determine the rate of wound infection using two standard wound preparations: 1: povidone-iodine and 2: chlorhexidine gluconate. [ Time Frame: within 6 weeks following surgery ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00528008 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • readmission to hospital [ Time Frame: within 6 weeks following surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • extended length of admission [ Time Frame: within 6 weeks following surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • need for intravenous antibiotics [ Time Frame: within 6 weeks following surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • need for repeat procedure such as drainage [ Time Frame: within 6 weeks following surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • increased outpatient surveillance [ Time Frame: within 6 weeks following surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
1.readmission to hospital 2.extended length of admission 3.need for intravenous antibiotics 4.need for repeat procedure such as drainage 5.increased outpatient surveillance [ Time Frame: within 6 weeks following surgery ]
 
A Comparison of Surgical Preparations and Wound Infection Rates for Elective Cesarean Sections
Povidone-Iodine vs. Chlorhexidine Gluconate - A Comparison of Surgical Preparations and Wound Infection Rates for Elective Cesarean Sections

The purpose of this study is to find out if chlorhexidine gluconate solution is better at reducing the rate of wound infection after cesarean section compared to povidone-iodine.

Wound infection is a universal potential morbidity to any type of surgery. Over the years many studies have been completed to evaluate ways to decrease this morbidity. Recent literature has looked at different types of surgical solutions used in pre-operative cleansing. Chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine are two standard surgical prep solutions used on a global scale. The most recent literature has shown that chlorhexidine has a decreased wound infection rate for longer surgeries. Cesarean section, as a surgical time, varies from 20 - 60 minutes. There has been no known literature regarding wound infection rates using these two solutions in elective cesarean sections. This trial will review the rates of wound infection using chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine during elective cesarean section and determine if there is any statistically significant difference between the two solutions. The results could potentially decrease wound infection rates, decrease morbidity, decrease hospital length of stay, and help to guide further surgical management.

Phase III
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Uncontrolled, Single Group Assignment, Efficacy Study
Wound Infection
  • Other: povidone-iodine solution
  • Other: chlorhexidine gluconate
  • Active Comparator: povidone-iodine
  • Active Comparator: chlorhexidine gluconate
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
494
November 2009
November 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >19 years
  • Gestational age > 37 weeks
  • Booked elective cesarean section

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Gestational age < 37 weeks
  • Premature rupture of membranes
  • Onset of labor prior to procedure
  • Evidence of maternal sepsis; maternal fever > 38.5C
  • LSCS for emergency issues: non-reassuring fetal status, placental abruption, failed induction
Female
19 Years and older
Yes
Contact: Donna R Hutchens, BN, RN 709-777-7471 donna.hutchens@easternhealth.ca
Canada
 
NCT00528008
Dr. Jillian Carpenter, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Obstectrics/Gynecology Resident
HIC07.33
Memorial University of Newfoundland
Eastern Health
Principal Investigator: Jillian Carpenter, MD Resident, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial University of Newfoundland
Memorial University of Newfoundland
August 2008

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP