Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone With or Without Lenalidomide in Treating Patients With Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With Dexamethasone
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Study NCT00522392   Information provided by National Cancer Institute (NCI)
First Received: August 28, 2007   Last Updated: March 18, 2010   History of Changes

August 28, 2007
March 18, 2010
August 2007
August 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Progression-free survival [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Progression-free survival
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00522392 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Response rates (complete response and very good partial response) [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Overall survival rates [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Difference in rate of all grade 3 or higher toxicity [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Difference in the mean change in the FACT-Ntx TOI score from study registration (prior to randomization) to 6 months post-consolidation treatment [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Impact of the differential treatment survival on quality of life at clinically meaningful timepoints (i.e., prior to study randomization, at the beginning of course 5, at the end of course 8, and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment) [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Comparison of response rates (complete response and very good partial response) between 2 arms
  • Comparison of the overall survival rates of patients in 2 arms
  • Difference in rate of all grade 3 or higher toxicity between 2 arms
  • Difference in the mean change in the FACT-Ntx TOI score from registration (prior to randomization) to post-consolidation treatment month 6 in both arms
  • Impact of the differential treatment survival on QOL at clinically meaningful timepoints (i.e., registration prior to randomization, the beginning of course 5, end of course 8, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment)
 
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone With or Without Lenalidomide in Treating Patients With Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With Dexamethasone
Randomized Phase III Trial of Consolidation Therapy With Bortezomib (Velcade®)- Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) -Dexamethasone (VRD) Versus Bortezomib (Velcade®) - Dexamethasone (VD) for Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Have Completed a Dexamethasone Based Induction Regimen

RATIONALE: Bortezomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as dexamethasone, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Lenalidomide may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop cancer cells from growing. It is not yet known whether giving bortezomib together with dexamethasone is more effective with or without lenalidomide in treating multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying bortezomib, dexamethasone, and lenalidomide to see how well they work compared with bortezomib and dexamethasone in treating patients with multiple myeloma previously treated with dexamethasone.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • To compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with previously treated symptomatic multiple myeloma treated with consolidation therapy comprising bortezomib and dexamethasone with vs without lenalidomide.

Secondary

  • To determine the incremental ability of these regimens in attaining a complete response or a very good partial response (VGPR) in these patients.
  • To compare the overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
  • To compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
  • To compare the quality of life of these patients.
  • To examine the impact of differential treatment response, if observed, on quality of life of these patients.
  • To obtain prospective data on multiple myeloma specific quality of life attributes.

OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to prior induction therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (yes vs no) and whether or not they are in complete response after induction therapy at study registration (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Arm I: Patients receive bortezomib IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, oral lenalidomide once a day on days 1-14, and oral dexamethasone once a day on days 1-4. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
  • Arm II: Patients receive bortezomib IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and oral dexamethasone once a day on days 1-4. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Quality of life is assessed periodically.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then every 12 months for 5 years.

Phase III
Interventional
Allocation:  Randomized
Masking:  Open Label
Primary Purpose:  Treatment
Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Neoplasm
  • Drug: bortezomib
    Given IV
  • Drug: dexamethasone
    Given orally
  • Drug: lenalidomide
    Given orally
  • Arm I: Experimental
    Patients receive bortezomib IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, oral lenalidomide once a day on days 1-14, and oral dexamethasone once a day on days 1-4. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    Interventions:
    • Drug: bortezomib
    • Drug: dexamethasone
    • Drug: lenalidomide
  • Arm II: Active Comparator
    Patients receive bortezomib IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and oral dexamethasone once a day on days 1-4. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    Interventions:
    • Drug: bortezomib
    • Drug: dexamethasone
Fonseca R, Rajkumar SV. Consolidation Therapy with Bortezomib/Lenalidomide/ Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib/Dexamethasone After a Dexamethasone-Based Induction Regimen in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Randomized Phase III Trial. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2008 Oct;8(5):315-7.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
392
 
August 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma
  • Must meet the following criteria at one point in the course of the disease for the original diagnosis of myeloma:

    • Bone marrow plasmacytosis with > 10% plasma cells or sheets of plasma cells or biopsy proven plasmacytoma
    • Must have symptomatic disease that prompted the initiation of therapy (e.g., anemia, hypercalcemia, bone disease, or renal dysfunction)
  • Must have completed a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 6 courses of a dexamethasone-based regimen within the past 8 weeks, including any of the following:

    • Dexamethasone alone
    • Vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone
    • Thalidomide and dexamethasone
    • Lenalidomide and dexamethasone
    • Liposomal doxorubicin and dexamethasone
    • The combination of any of the above agents and dexamethasone
    • Cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone
  • Received a minimum cumulative dose of 160 mg of dexamethasone (no maximum dose specified)
  • Must have not experienced progressive disease on the dexamethasone-based regimen
  • Patients diagnosed with only smoldering myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance are not eligible

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • ECOG performance status 0-2
  • Hemoglobin > 7 g/dL
  • Platelet count > 75,000/mm^3
  • Absolute neutrophil count > 1,000/mm^3 (without the use of growth factors to increase ANC)
  • Creatinine < 2.5 mg/dL and creatinine clearance (measured or calculated) ≥ 60 mL/min
  • Direct bilirubin < 1.5 mg/dL
  • ALT and AST < 2.5 times upper limit of normal
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective double-method contraception for 4 weeks prior to, during, and for 4 weeks after completion of study therapy
  • No active uncontrolled seizure disorder
  • No seizure within the past 6 months
  • No concurrent uncontrolled illness that would limit compliance with the study, including any of the following:

    • Uncontrolled hypertension
    • Symptomatic congestive heart failure
    • Unstable angina
    • Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia
    • Uncontrolled psychiatric illness or social situation
    • History of Steven Johnson syndrome
  • No peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 2
  • No active uncontrolled infection
  • Patients with a history of prior malignancy are eligible provided there is no active malignancy AND there is a low expectation of recurrence within 6 months
  • Must be willing and able to receive prophylaxis with aspirin (325 mg/day) or alternative prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin or coumadin

    • Patients with prior DVT are eligible provided they remain on the anticoagulation regimen that was prescribed for treatment of the DVT throughout study therapy

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • At least 14 days since prior palliative and/or localized radiotherapy
  • Prior bortezomib allowed
  • Concurrent bisphosphonates or growth factors (e.g., granulocyte and/or erythropoietic agents) for multiple myeloma allowed
Both
18 Years and older
No
 
United States,   South Africa
 
NCT00522392
Robert L. Comis, ECOG Group Chair's Office
CDR0000561758, ECOG-E1A05
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Study Chair: Rafael Fonseca, MD Mayo Clinic
Study Chair: S. V. Rajkumar, MD Mayo Clinic
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
March 2010

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP