Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Efficacy of Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant in Diabetic Macular Edema
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00502541   Information provided by Bausch & Lomb, Inc.
First Received: July 13, 2007   Last Updated: February 26, 2009   History of Changes

July 13, 2007
February 26, 2009
September 2001
September 2006   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
A change from baseline in visual acuity using ETDRS charts • Humphrey Visual Field Mean Defect (24-2) • Masked reading of the size of the area of retinal thickening on color photographs and OCT, where available, and of severity of fluorescein leakage [ Time Frame: at 26 weeks and yearly through completion of the study ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
A change from baseline in visual acuity using ETDRS charts • Humphrey Visual Field Mean Defect (24-2) • Masked reading of the size of the area of retinal thickening on color photographs and OCT, where available, and of severity of fluorescein leakag [ Time Frame: at 26 weeks and yearly through completion of the study ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00502541 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
 
 
 
Efficacy of Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant in Diabetic Macular Edema
A Multicenter, Randomized, Masked, Controlled Study to Evaluate Retisert, and Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant, in the Treatment of Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema

This was a multi-center, randomized, masked, parallel-group, controlled study in patients with diabetic macular edema, comparing RetisertTM (0.59 mg) with control therapy (standard of care (SOC) - repeat macular grid laser or observation). The objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant in the treatment of patients with diabetic macular edema.

 
Phase II, Phase III
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Diabetic Macular Edema
  • Drug: fluocinolone acetonide
  • Procedure: Standard of Care
  • Experimental: Fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant
  • Active Comparator: Standard of care
Jaffe GJ, Martin D, Callanan D, Pearson PA, Levy B, Comstock T; Fluocinolone Acetonide Uveitis Study Group. Fluocinolone acetonide implant (Retisert) for noninfectious posterior uveitis: thirty-four-week results of a multicenter randomized clinical study. Ophthalmology. 2006 Jun;113(6):1020-7. Epub 2006 May 9.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Completed
196
September 2006
September 2006   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and nonpregnant females at least 18 years of age, with DME in the study eye
  • Edema must involve fixation and be at least 1 disc area in size
  • Visual acuity of ≥20 and ≤68 letters by ETDRS in the study eye
  • The study eye must have received at least one macular laser treatment > 12 weeks prior to entry into the study
  • Ability and willingness to comply with treatment and follow-up
  • Ability to understand and sign the Informed Consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant, lactating females
  • Allergy to fluocinolone acetonide or any component of the delivery system
  • Any disease or condition that would preclude study treatment or follow up
  • Presence at screening of IOP greater or equal to 22 mm HG while on antiglaucoma medication(s).
  • History of uncontrolled IOP within the last 12 months
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
 
 
NCT00502541
Susan Schneider, MD, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
CDS FL-005
Bausch & Lomb, Inc.
 
Study Director: Timothy L Comstock, OD Bausch & Lomb, Inc.
Bausch & Lomb, Inc.
February 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP