| July 11, 2007 |
| November 4, 2009 |
| July 2007 |
| March 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Reduction in mean SBP as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] |
| Reduction in mean SBP as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to week 24 ] |
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00500604 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
- Reduction in mean DBP as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Reduction in mean morning and evening SBP as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Reduction in mean morning and evening DBP as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Reduction in mean SBP and mean DBP evaluated at the doctor's office [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of normalised patients as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of normalised patients evaluated at the doctor's office [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Reduction in mean SBP as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Adverse events, vital signs, laboratory tests [ Time Frame: From visit 1 to end of study ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
|
- Reduction in mean DBP as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ]
- Reduction in mean morning and evening SBP as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ]
- Reduction in mean morning and evening DBP as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ]
- Reduction in mean SBP and mean DBP evaluated at the doctor's office [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ]
- Number of normalised patients as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ]
- Number of normalised patients evaluated at the doctor's office [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ]
- Reduction in mean SBP as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to week 16 ]
- Adverse events, vital signs, laboratory tests
|
| |
| Efficacy of Irbesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide Versus Valsartan/Hydrochlorothiazide in Mild to Moderate Hypertension |
| A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Irbesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide 300/25 mg Versus Valsartan/Hydrochlorothiazide 160/25 mg Using Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Hypertension |
The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide 300/25mg against valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide 160/25mg in reducing mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) as measured by home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) after 24 weeks compared with baseline.
The secondary objectives are:
- To compare the percentage of patients with normal blood pressure as measured by HBPM and at the doctor's office at weeks 16 and 24
- To compare the differences in mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), mean morning and evening SBP and DBP evaluated by HBPM at weeks 16 and 24
- To compare the difference in mean SBP evaluated by HBPM at week 16
- To compare the differences in mean SBP and DBP evaluated at the doctor's office at weeks 16 and 24
- To determine the incidence and severity of adverse events
|
| |
| Phase IV |
| Interventional |
| Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study |
| Hypertension |
- Drug: Irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide
- Drug: Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide
- Drug: Hydrochlorothiazide
|
- Experimental:
- period 1: Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg for 3-5 weeks
- period 2: One 150/12.5mg tablet every morning for 8 weeks.
- period 3: One 300/12.5mg tablet every morning for 8 weeks.
- period 4: Two 150/12.5mg tablets every morning for 8 weeks.
- Active Comparator:
- period 1: Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg for 3-5 weeks
- period 2: One 80/12.5mg tablet every morning for 8 weeks.
- period 3: One 160/12.5mg tablet every morning for 8 weeks.
- period 4: Two 80/12.5mg tablets every morning for 8 weeks.
|
| |
| |
| Active, not recruiting |
| 1325 |
| March 2010 |
| March 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Established essential hypertension, untreated or treated but uncontrolled with treatment:
- Office SBP ≥ 160 mmHg for untreated patients
- Office SBP ≥ 140 mmHg for patients already treated with an antihypertensive drug.
Previous antihypertensive therapy must have been implemented for a minimum of 4 weeks and must be either monotherapy or one of the following permitted combination drugs:
- ACE inhibitor / calcium channel blocker
- Beta blocker / calcium channel blocker
- Beta blocker / low dose diuretic
- ACE inhibitor / low dose diuretic
Exclusion Criteria:
- SBP ≥ 180 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 110 mmHg evaluated at doctor's office at Visit 1
- Known or suspected causes of secondary hypertension
- Patient with bilateral renal artery stenosis, renal artery stenosis in a solitary kidney, a renal transplant or only has one functioning kidney
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus
- Significant cardiovascular, neurological, endocrine, renal, metabolic, or gastrointestinal disease, a malignancy or any other diseases considered by the Investigator to make participation in the study not in the best interest of the subject
- Known hypersensitivity to diuretics or sulphonamides or history of angioedema or cough related to the administration of an angiotensin II receptor antagonist or any combination of the drugs used
- Known contraindications to any of the study drugs
- Concomitant use of any other antihypertensive treatment
- Use of any of the investigational products for this study within the 3 months prior to the study
- Inability to obtain a valid HBPM recording i.e., obesity, arm circumference > 32 cm or arrhythmia
- Administration of any other investigational drug in the last 30 days before enrolment and during the course of the study
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Women of childbearing potential not protected by effective contraceptive method of birth control and/or who are unwilling or unable to be tested for pregnancy
The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial. |
| Both |
| 18 Years to 80 Years |
| No |
| Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| Egypt, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Korea, Republic of, Malaysia, Morocco, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, Tunisia, Vietnam |
| |
| NCT00500604 |
| Medical Affairs Study Director, sanofi-aventis |
| IRBEH_R_02584 |
| Sanofi-Aventis |
|
| Study Director: |
Benedict Blayney |
Sanofi-Aventis |
|
|
| Sanofi-Aventis |
| November 2009 |