Laparoscopic Assisted Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Carcinoma

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Chinese University of Hong Kong
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00485316
First received: June 11, 2007
Last updated: March 30, 2009
Last verified: March 2009

June 11, 2007
March 30, 2009
September 1993
October 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Overall survival and disease-free survival
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00485316 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Operative time
  • Blood loss
  • Postoperative analgesic requirements
  • Recovery of gastrointestinal function (time to resume normal diet, time first passing flatus, time of first bowel motion)
  • Time to walk independently
  • Duration of hospital stay
  • Morbidity and mortality
  • Direct cost
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Laparoscopic Assisted Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Carcinoma
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Assisted and Open Resection for Colonic and Rectal Carcinoma

The aim of the investigators' randomized trial is to compare the short-term clinical outcome and survival between laparoscopic-assisted and open resection of colorectal carcinoma.

Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1987, laparoscopic surgery has been attempted and applied to many surgical operations. Surgeons in Hong Kong began to perform laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma in early 1992. Early reports of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma from Hong Kong and worldwide suggested better short-term clinical outcomes when compared with open surgery, but there were concerns over port site metastases and adequacy of long-term oncological clearance. Besides, only a few randomized trials thus far have compared laparoscopic-assisted and open surgery for rectal carcinoma.

The aim of our randomized trial is to compare the short-term clinical outcome and survival between laparoscopic-assisted and open resection of colonic and rectal carcinoma.

Patients will undergo different types of surgery according to the location of the tumors: right or extended right hemicolectomy for cecal, ascending colon, or hepatic flexure tumors; left hemicolectomy for descending colon tumors; sigmoid colectomy for sigmoid colon tumors; anterior resection for rectosigmoid or upper rectal tumors; low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for mid- and low rectal tumors; abdominoperineal resection for very low rectal tumors. Patients will be randomly allocated to laparoscopic assisted or conventional open surgery.

Short-term clinical outcome and long-term survival data will be prospectively recorded and compared between the two treatment arms.

Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Colorectal Carcinoma
Procedure: Laparoscopic assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma
Not Provided
Li JC, Leung KL, Ng SS, Liu SY, Lee JF, Hon SS. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open resection of right-sided colonic cancer--a prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jan;27(1):95-102. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
Not Provided
October 2008
October 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed to have colorectal carcinoma at all locations except transverse colon
  • Informed consent available

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with tumor >6 cm in size, or with tumor infiltration to adjacent organs on imagings
  • Patients with previous abdominal surgery near the region of the colorectal surgery
  • Patients with intestinal obstruction or perforation
  • Patients with recurrent disease
  • Patients with synchronous colorectal carcinoma
Both
Not Provided
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
China
 
NCT00485316
CRE-8118
Yes
Ka Lau Leung, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Ka Lau Leung, MD Chinese University of Hong Kong
Chinese University of Hong Kong
March 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP