Comparison of Awakening Versus Bedtime Dosing of Ramipril in Subjects With Essential Hypertension (HYCCRA)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
King Pharmaceuticals is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Information provided by:
University of Vigo
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00473174
First received: May 11, 2007
Last updated: September 1, 2009
Last verified: September 2009

May 11, 2007
September 1, 2009
March 2007
December 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
To demonstrate the efficacy of bedtime administration of ramipril in subjects with essential hypertension by testing the hypothesis of superior nocturnal SBP lowering in ABPM measurements compared with ramipril administered on awakening [ Time Frame: Three months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
To demonstrate the efficacy of bedtime administration of ramipril in subjects with essential hypertension by testing the hypothesis of superior nocturnal SBP lowering in ABPM measurements compared with ramipril administered on awakening [ Time Frame: Three months ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00473174 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • To demonstrate that ramipril at bedtime is more effective than ramipril upon awakening in terms of nocturnal DBP lowering in ABPM [ Time Frame: Three months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • To demonstrate that ramipril at bedtime is not inferior to ramipril upon awakening in terms of 24-hour SBP/DBP lowering in ABPM [ Time Frame: Three months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • To demonstrate that ramipril at bedtime is more effective than ramipril upon awakening in terms of increasing the diurnal/nocturnal SBP and DBP ratio determined by ABPM [ Time Frame: Three months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • To demonstrate that ramipril at bedtime offers a similar safety profile than ramipril upon awakening [ Time Frame: Three months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • To demonstrate that compliance with ramipril at bedtime is similar to compliance of ramipril upon awakening [ Time Frame: Three months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • To demonstrate that ramipril at bedtime is more effective than ramipril upon awakening in terms of nocturnal DBP lowering in ABPM [ Time Frame: Three months ]
  • To demonstrate that ramipril at bedtime is not inferior to ramipril upon awakening in terms of 24-hour SBP/DBP lowering in ABPM [ Time Frame: Three months ]
  • To demonstrate that ramipril at bedtime is more effective than ramipril upon awakening in terms of increasing the diurnal/nocturnal SBP and DBP ratio determined by ABPM [ Time Frame: Three months ]
  • To demonstrate that ramipril at bedtime offers a similar safety profile than ramipril upon awakening [ Time Frame: Three months ]
  • To demonstrate that compliance with ramipril at bedtime is similar to compliance of ramipril upon awakening [ Time Frame: Three months ]
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Comparison of Awakening Versus Bedtime Dosing of Ramipril in Subjects With Essential Hypertension
A Prospective, Randomized, Open Label, Blinded-endpoint Study to Compare Awakening Versus Bedtime Administration of 5-10 mg Ramipril in Terms of Systolic Blood Pressure Lowering Determined by ABPM in Subjects With Mild-to-moderate Essential

This prospective chronotherapy trial will investigate the potential differing efficacy of ramipril in doses from 5 to 10 mg/day when administered, as a monotherapy either upon awakening from nighttime sleep or at bedtime, to diurnally active patients with grade 1 or 2 essential hypertension, who will be evaluated by 48-hour ABPM before and after pharmacologic intervention. The benefits from this trial may be extremely important, taking into account

  1. the high prevalence of non-dipping among patients with essential hypertension
  2. the need for a proper 24-hour BP control with particular emphasis on the regulation of nighttime resting BP mean
  3. the lacking information on the administration-time dependent effects on BP of ramipril, a widely used ACEI in doses of 5-10 mg/day.

Several attributes of the cardiovascular system, including blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR), are characterized by predictable changes during the 24 hours for the most part in synchrony with the rest-activity cycle. During the past two decades specific features of the 24-hour BP pattern have been assessed as potential sources of injury to target tissues and as triggers of cardiac and cerebrovascular events in hypertensive patients. A growing number of studies indicate the reduction of the normal 10 to 20% sleep-time BP decline (non-dipper pattern) is associated with elevated risk of end-organ injury, particularly to the heart (left ventricular hypertrophy and myocardial infarct), brain (stoke) and kidney (albuminuria and progression to end-stage renal failure). Accordingly, there is growing interest in how to tailor the treatment of hypertensive patients according to their circadian BP pattern.

Clinical studies demonstrated a different effect of the ACEIs benazepril, enalapril, perindopril, quinapril, spirapril, and trandolapril when dosed in the morning versus the evening. A small trial on 33 patients with essential hypertension showed that a low dose of 2.5 mg/day ramipril more effectively reduced daytime BP when it was administered in the morning and more effectively reduced nighttime BP when it was administered in the evening. In the HOPE (Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation) study patients in the active treatment group received ramipril at bedtime. Results from a small substudy, in which hypertensive patients were evaluated with 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), showed a marked BP reduction particularly during nighttime sleep, thereby reducing the prevalence of non-dippers. The authors concluded that the effects on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality seen with ramipril in the HOPE study may relate to its improved effect (i.e., increase in the diurnal/nocturnal BP ratio) on the non-dipping BP patterns.

In keeping with the documented administration-time dependent effects on BP regulation of other ACEI, this prospective chronotherapy trial will investigate the potential differing efficacy of ramipril in doses from 5 to 10 mg/day when administered, as a monotherapy either upon awakening from nighttime sleep or at bedtime, to diurnally active patients with grade 1 or 2 essential hypertension, who will be evaluated by 48-hour ABPM before and after pharmacologic intervention. The benefits from this trial may be extremely important, taking into account 1) the high prevalence of non-dipping among patients with essential hypertension, 2) the need for a proper 24-hour BP control with particular emphasis on the regulation of nighttime resting BP mean, and 3) the lacking information on the administration-time dependent effects on BP of ramipril, a widely used ACEI in doses of 5-10 mg/day.

Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Hypertension
  • Drug: Ramipril
    Dosing on awakening versus bedtime
  • Device: ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure measured at 20-min intervals from 07:00 to 23:00 hours and at 30-min intervals at night for 48 consecutive hours
  • Active Comparator: 1
    Ramipril on awakening
    Interventions:
    • Drug: Ramipril
    • Device: ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
  • Active Comparator: 2
    Ramipril at bedtime
    Interventions:
    • Drug: Ramipril
    • Device: ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
Hermida RC, Ayala DE. Chronotherapy with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril in essential hypertension: improved blood pressure control with bedtime dosing. Hypertension. 2009 Jul;54(1):40-6. Epub 2009 May 11.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
120
December 2008
December 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Essential hypertension

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe hypertension.
  • Secondary hypertension.
  • Grade III/IV hypertensive retinopathy.
  • Type 1 diabetes.
  • Cerebrovascular or cardiovascular event during the last 12 months prior to inclusion.
  • Pregnant or lactating females.
  • History of malignancy within the past five years.
  • Shift workers.
  • Obstructive sleep apnea.
  • Use of disallowed concomitant medication.
  • Intolerant to ABPM.
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Spain
 
NCT00473174
HYCCRA-2006/01, Eudract-2006-006107-37
Yes
Ramon C. Hermida, University of Vigo
University of Vigo
King Pharmaceuticals is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Principal Investigator: Ramon C Hermida, PhD University of Vigo
University of Vigo
September 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP