Educational CD-ROM Compared With Standard Informed Consent for Patients With Colorectal Cancer or a Family History of Colorectal Cancer

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Fox Chase Cancer Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00450424
First received: March 20, 2007
Last updated: January 29, 2013
Last verified: January 2013

March 20, 2007
January 29, 2013
June 2007
December 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Impact of standard informed consent vs CD-ROM educational intervention on knowledge about microsatellite instability (MSI) testing [ Time Frame: at enrollment and 2 weeks after enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Participants completed a baseline survey upon enrollment to the trial. 2 weeks after baseline, they completed a follow-up survey (assessed at both baseline and FU).
  • Impact of standard informed consent vs CD-ROM educational intervention on knowledge about microsatellite instability (MSI) testing
  • Patient satisfaction with the preparation to make a decision
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00450424 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Differential impact of CD-ROM on satisfaction with MSI test decision, difficulty making decision & decisional conflict; attitude; general & cancer-related distress; discussions with family about MSI test & familial colorectal cancer risk [ Time Frame: at enrollment and 2 weeks after enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Participants completed a baseline survey upon enrollment to the trial. 2 weeks after baseline, they completed a follow-up survey (assessed at both baseline and FU).
  • Impact of demographic factors, disease/family history characteristics, family support, and cancer-related distress on satisfaction with and completeness of the informed consent process [ Time Frame: at enrollment and 2 weeks after enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Participants completed a baseline survey upon enrollment to the trial. 2 weeks after baseline, they completed a follow-up survey (assessed at both baseline and FU).
  • Patient satisfaction with the preparation to make a decision [ Time Frame: at enrollment and 2 weeks after enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Participants completed a baseline survey upon enrollment to the trial. 2 weeks after baseline, they completed a follow-up survey (assessed at both baseline and FU).
  • Differential impact of CD-ROM on satisfaction with MSI test decision
  • Difficulty making decision
  • Decisional conflict
  • Attitude
  • General and cancer-related distress
  • Discussions with family members about the MSI test
  • Familial colorectal cancer risk
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Educational CD-ROM Compared With Standard Informed Consent for Patients With Colorectal Cancer or a Family History of Colorectal Cancer
Facilitating Informed Decisions for MSI Testing

RATIONALE: The use of a CD-ROM may help patients with colorectal cancer or a family history of colorectal cancer make informed decisions about undergoing microsatellite instability (MSI) testing.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying an educational CD-ROM to see how well it works compared with standard informed consent to assist decision-making about MSI testing in patients with colorectal cancer or a family history of colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Compare the impact of standard informed consent vs a CD-ROM educational intervention on knowledge about microsatellite instability (MSI) testing in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) or a family history of CRC.
  • Determine the impact of these interventions on patient satisfaction with the preparation to make a decision.

Secondary

  • Determine whether the CD-ROM educational intervention has a differential impact on satisfaction with the MSI test decision, difficulty making the MSI test decision, and decisional conflict, as well as on patients' attitudes about MSI testing and CRC (e.g., perceived benefits and barriers to having the MSI test, perceived risk for colorectal and related cancers, self-efficacy), on general and cancer-related distress, and on discussions with family members about the MSI test and familial CRC risk.
  • Assess whether demographic factors, disease/family history characteristics, family support for testing, and cancer-related distress moderate the impact of the intervention on satisfaction with and completeness of the informed consent process.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, pilot, study (part I) followed by a randomized study (part II).

  • Part I: The educational CD-ROM is developed over 9 months. Patients receive a pilot version of the CD-ROM and provide feedback regarding usability and content.
  • Part II: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

    • Arm I: Patients complete a baseline interview and receive a standard informed consent for microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and a brief, standardized explanation of the MSI test.
    • Arm II: Patients complete a baseline interview and receive a standard informed consent for MSI testing and the educational CD-ROM developed in phase I.

All patients in part II (even those that did not consent to the MSI test) complete a follow-up survey at 2 weeks.

Tissue samples from patients are analyzed by immunohistochemistry and MSI assay (polymerase chain reaction) for MLH1 and MSH2.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 184 patients will be accrued for this study.

Interventional
Not Provided
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Hereditary Non-polyposis Colon Cancer
  • Genetic: microsatellite instability analysis
  • Genetic: mutation analysis
  • Genetic: polymerase chain reaction
  • Other: counseling intervention
  • Other: educational intervention
  • Other: immunohistochemistry staining method
  • Other: laboratory biomarker analysis
No Intervention: Counseling
Counseling
Interventions:
  • Genetic: microsatellite instability analysis
  • Genetic: mutation analysis
  • Genetic: polymerase chain reaction
  • Other: counseling intervention
  • Other: educational intervention
  • Other: immunohistochemistry staining method
  • Other: laboratory biomarker analysis
Manne SL, Meropol NJ, Weinberg DS, Vig H, Ali-Khan Catts Z, Manning C, Ross E, Shannon K, Chung DC. Facilitating informed decisions regarding microsatellite instability testing among high-risk individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 10;28(8):1366-72. Epub 2010 Feb 8.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
239
Not Provided
December 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Patient or family member meeting 1 of the following revised Bethesda colorectal cancer (CRC) criteria:

  • Diagnosis of colon or rectal cancer at < 50 years of age
  • Diagnosis of > 1 CRC at one time in the past
  • Diagnosis of ≥ 1 CRC at different times
  • Diagnosis of CRC and any other hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)-related cancers
  • Diagnosis of CRC in ≥ 2 first-degree or second-degree relatives with HNPCC-related tumor and ≥ 1 cancer diagnosed at < 50 years of age
  • Diagnosis of CRC in ≥ 2 first- or second-degree relatives with HNPCC-related tumors, regardless of age
  • Diagnosis of CRC with pathologic features suggestive of microsatellite instability (MSI) and < 60 years of age

    • Patients with CRC meeting the Amsterdam criteria defined below are ineligible:
  • Three relatives with CRC with 1 being a first-degree relative of the other 2
  • Cases that span ≥ 2 generations
  • At least 1 CRC case diagnosed before 50 years of age

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Not specified

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • Not specified
Both
21 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00450424
CDR0000443988, 04827, R01CA109332-05
No
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Fox Chase Cancer Center
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Principal Investigator: Sharon Manne, PhD Fox Chase Cancer Center
Fox Chase Cancer Center
January 2013

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP