| January 11, 2007 |
| September 27, 2011 |
| January 2007 |
| March 2009 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
|
|
- Change from baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Japan cognitive subscale (ADAS-J cog) after 24 weeks treatment
- Change from baseline in the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus - Japan (CIBIC plus-J) after 24 weeks treatment
|
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00423085 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
- Change From Baseline in CIBIC Plus-J Score Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) was used to assess levels of difficulty in activities of daily living (ADL). The DAD is administered through an interview with the caregiver. A total score is obtained by adding the rating for each question and converting this to a total score out of 100 (%). Higher scores represent less disability in ADL while lower scores indicate more dysfunction. A positive change score indicates an improvement from baseline.
- Change From Baseline in CIBIC Plus-J Score Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (Behave-AD) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
BEHAVE-AD was used to assess patient behavior and psychiatric symptoms. It covers symptoms in seven categories: paranoid and delusional ideation, hallucinations, activity disturbances, diurnal rhythm disturbances, aggressiveness, affective disorders and anxieties, and phobias. Caregivers rate behavioral symptoms on a 0-3 scale. The total score can range from 0 to 66, with a lower score indicating better function. A negative change score indicates an improvement from baseline.
- Change From Baseline in CIBIC Plus-J Score Mental Function Impairment Scale (MENFIS) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
MENFIS was used to assess patient cognitive and psychiatric function, and evaluates core symptoms of dementia including cognitive, motivational and emotional aspects. The total score ranges from 0 to 78. The higher the score, the greater the functional deficit. A negative change score indicates an improvement from baseline.
- Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The MMSE is a screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language); the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function. A positive change score indicates improvement from baseline.
- Extension Phase: Change From Extension Phase Baseline to End of Extension in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [ Time Frame: Extension Phase Baseline and Week 52 of extension phase ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The MMSE is a screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language); the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function. A positive change score indicates improvement. This outcome measured the change in MMSE from the beginning of the open-label extension phase through to Week 52 of the extension phase.
- Extension Phase: Change From Extension Phase Baseline to End of Extension in CIBIC Plus-J Score Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) [ Time Frame: Extension Phase Baseline and Week 52 of extension phase ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) was used to assess levels of difficulty in activities of daily living. The DAD is administered through an interview with the caregiver. A total score is obtained by adding the rating for each question and converting this to a total score out of 100 (%). Higher scores represent less disability in activities of daily living while lower scores indicate more dysfunction. A positive change score indicates an improvement from baseline.
- Extension Phase: Change From Extension Phase Baseline to End of Extension in Modified Crichton Scale [ Time Frame: Extension Phase Baseline and Week 52 of extension phase ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The Modified Crichton Scale includes a total of seven items evaluated in eight grades that assess basic activities of daily living, communication functions, psychiatric symptoms and quality of life; the total score can range from 0 to 56, with a lower score indicating better function. A negative change score indicates an improvement from baseline.
|
- Change from baseline in CIBIC plus-J score (Disability Assessment for Dementia [DAD], Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale [Behave-AD], the Mental Function Impairment Scale [MENFIS ]) after 24 weeks of treatment
- Change from baseline in MMSE after 24 weeks of treatment
|
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| |
| Efficacy and Safety of Rivastigmine Transdermal Patch in Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease |
| A 24-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Dose-finding Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of the Once-daily Rivastigmine Transdermal Patch in Patients With Probable Alzheimer's Disease (MMSE 10-20) |
The purpose of this study was to investigate the 5cm^2 and 10cm^2 doses of rivastigmine transdermal patch in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with probable Alzheimer's Disease (MMSE [Mini Mental State Examination] 10-20). A 52-week extension phase evaluated the safety and tolerability of long-term treatment by rivastigmine transdermal patch in patients with probable Alzheimer's Disease (AD). |
Patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to one of the 3 treatment arms (placebo, rivastigmine 5 cm^2 and rivastigmine 10 cm^2) in a ratio of 1:1:1. During the Double-blind treatment phase, patients entered a 16-week Titration Period followed by an 8-week Maintenance Period. During the open-label extension phase, all patients started treatment with a 2.5 cm^2 patch and the dose was increased to 10 cm^2 over a 16-week titration period, followed by a maintenance period of 36 weeks. |
| Interventional |
| Phase 3 |
Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Alzheimer's Disease |
- Drug: Rivastigmine transdermal patch
Rivastigmine transdermal patch was provided in the following sizes and doses:
2.5 cm^2 (4.5 mg), 5 cm^2 (9 mg), 7.5 cm^2 (13.5 mg), and 10 cm^2 (18 mg). The caregiver applied one patch on the back of a patient, placed alternately from the right to the left side at approximately the same time each day.
- Drug: Placebo
Placebo transdermal patch was provided in the following sizes: 2.5 cm^2, 5 cm^2, 7.5 cm^2 and 10 cm^2. The caregiver applied one patch on the back of a patient, placed alternately from the right to the left side at approximately the same time each day.
|
- Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants received daily matching placebo patch for the duration of the 24-week double-blind treatment phase of the study.
Intervention: Drug: Placebo
- Experimental: rivastigmine 5 cm^2
During the 16-week titration period patients received daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch for the first 4 weeks and thereafter daily rivastigmine 5 cm^2 patch. For patients who experienced intolerability, the dose was adjusted to rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 daily. Patients then entered the 8-week maintenance period during which time they continued to receive the dose of rivastigmine they were taking at the end of the titration period.
Intervention: Drug: Rivastigmine transdermal patch
- Experimental: Rivastigmine 10 cm^2
During the 16-week titration period patients received daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch for the first 4 weeks, rivastigmine 5 cm^2 patch for the next 4 weeks, rivastigmine 7.5 cm^2 patch for the next 4 weeks and then rivastigmine 10 cm^2 patch for the final 4 weeks. For patients who experienced intolerability, the dose was adjusted downward. Patients then entered the 8-week maintenance period during which time they continued to receive the dose of rivastigmine they were taking at the end of the titration period.
Intervention: Drug: Rivastigmine transdermal patch
|
| Not Provided |
| |
| Completed |
| 859 |
| April 2010 |
| March 2009 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Inclusion Criteria:
- A diagnosis of dementia of the Alzheimer's type according to the DSM-IV criteria
- A clinical diagnosis of probable AD according to NINCDS/ADRDA criteria
- An MMSE score of > or = 10 and < or = 20
Exclusion Criteria:
- A current DSM-IV diagnosis of major depression
- Taken rivastigmine in the past
- A score of > 5 on the Modified Hachinski Ischemic Scale (MHIS) Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Extension Phase Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have completed the Double-blind Treatment Phase on study medication
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients who have any important protocol deviations until the completion of the Double-blind Treatment Phase
|
| Both |
| 50 Years to 85 Years |
| No |
| Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| Japan |
| |
| NCT00423085 |
| CENA713D1301 |
| Not Provided
| Novartis ( Novartis Pharmaceuticals ) |
| Novartis Pharmaceuticals |
| Ono Pharma USA Inc |
| Study Director: |
Novartis Pharmaceuticals |
Novartis Pharmaceuticals |
|
|
| Novartis |
| September 2011 |