Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Standard Versus Continuous Capecitabine in Advanced Breast Cancer
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Study NCT00418028   Information provided by Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
First Received: January 3, 2007   Last Updated: May 14, 2008   History of Changes

January 3, 2007
May 14, 2008
September 2005
August 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
time to progression [ Time Frame: 2005-2009 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Grade 2 or greater hand and foot syndrome
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00418028 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Response rate [ Time Frame: 2005-2009 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Toxicity [ Time Frame: 2005-2009 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Relation of patient polymorphisms to toxicity and activity [ Time Frame: 2005-2009 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Response rate
  • Time to progression
  • Relation of patient polymorphisms to toxicity and activity
 
Standard Versus Continuous Capecitabine in Advanced Breast Cancer
Randomized Phase II Trial of Continuous Versus Standard Capecitabine in Advanced Breast Cancer.

Capecitabine is active in metastatic breast cancer but the conventional schedule (1250 mg/m2/12 hr 2 weeks on, one week off) produces grade 2 or greater hand and foot syndrome in up to 50% of patients leading to those reductions. There are theoretical reasons to administer S-phase specific agents in continuous, protracted rather than intermittent schedules. Our study compares the standard schedule(1250 mg/m2/12 hr 2 weeks on, one week off)with a continuous administration schedule (800 mg/m2/12hr). The latter administer approximately the same cumulative dose of capecitabine as the standard schedule. The study hypothesis is that grade 2 or greater hand and foot syndrome will be reduced from 50% (standard arm) to 20% (experimental arm).We assume similar antitumor activity in both arms.

Capecitabine is active in metastatic breast cancer but the conventional schedule (1250 mg/m2/12 hr 2 weeks on, one week off) produces grade 2 or greater hand and foot syndrome in up to 50% of patients leading to those reductions. Some authors have tested continuous administration schedules of capecitabine, showing better tolerance and apparently similar antitumor activity. Capecitabine is a pro-drug of 5-FU and mimics an i.v. continuous infusion administration of this antimetabolite. On the other hand, there are theoretical reasons to administer S-phase specific agents in continuous, protracted rather than intermittent schedules. Our study compares the standard schedule(1250 mg/m2/12 hr 2 weeks on, one week off)with a continuous administration schule (800 mg/m2/12hr). The latter schedule administer approximately the same cumulative dose of capecitabine as the standard one. The study hypothesis is that grade 2 or greater hand and foot syndrome will be reduced from 50% (standard arm) to 20% (experimental arm). We assume similar antitumor activity in both arms.

Phase II, Phase III
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Dose Comparison, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Metastatic Breast Cancer
Drug: capecitabine
  • Experimental: capecitabine 800 mg/m2 twice a day orally continuous administration
  • Active Comparator: capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 twice a day x 14 days every 3 weeks
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
176
December 2010
August 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Metastatic breast cancer
  • Prior anthracyclines and/or taxanes
  • ECOG>2
  • Measurable disease by RECIST
  • Age 18-75

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known hypersensitivity or toxic reactions to fluoropyrimidines
  • Prior capecitabine therapy
  • Prior cardiac disease
  • Relevant renal nal insufficiency (creatinine clearance <30 ml/min)
  • Active infection
  • Second cancers
  • Impaired bone marrow, liver or cardiac function
  • More than two lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease.
  • Her2 amplification
Female
18 Years to 75 Years
No
Contact: Miguel Martin, MD, PhD +34-91-3303546 mmartin@geicam.org
Contact: Jose Angel Garcia Saenz, MD, PhD +34-91-3303546 jagsaenz@yahoo.es
Spain
 
NCT00418028
Miguel Martin, MD, Hospital San Carlos
05/237
Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
Hospital Juan Canalejo, La Coruña, Spain
Principal Investigator: Miguel Martin, MD,PhD Hospital Clinico San Carlos
Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
May 2008

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP