Comparison Between hCG and GnRH Agonist for Ovulation Induction in Patients With High Response to IVF Drugs

The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified January 2007 by Eugonia.
Recruitment status was  Active, not recruiting
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Eugonia
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00415792
First received: December 22, 2006
Last updated: January 4, 2007
Last verified: January 2007

December 22, 2006
January 4, 2007
November 2003
Not Provided
Ongoing pregnancy per embryo transfer
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00415792 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Biochemical pregnancy per embryo transfer
  • Clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer
  • Embryological data
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Comparison Between hCG and GnRH Agonist for Ovulation Induction in Patients With High Response to IVF Drugs
Administration of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) Versus Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist for Ovulation Induction in Hyper-Responder Patients

hCG and GnRH agonist can be used to induce final oocyte maturation and ovulation in IVF cycles. These two approaches will be compared in this study in terms of pregnancy rates and embryological data using patients with hyper-response to IVF drugs.

hCG is commonly used for the substitution of the endogenous LH surge to induce oocyte maturation and ovulation induction in ovarian hyperstimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization (IVF). However, hCG is related to the occurrence of the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), a potentially life-threatening complication and hyper-responding patients are particularly in high risk. An alternative to exogenous hCG is the administration of a GnRH agonist inducing an endogenous rise in both LH and FSH levels due to the initial flare effect.

Comparisons: Pregnancy rates and embryological data will be compared from hyper-responding patients receiving either GnRH agonist (Arvekap) or hCG (Pregnyl) for ovulatrion induction following a GnRH antagonist treatment cycle.

Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Infertility
Drug: Arvekap, Pregnyl
Not Provided
Griesinger G, Diedrich K, Devroey P, Kolibianakis EM. GnRH agonist for triggering final oocyte maturation in the GnRH antagonist ovarian hyperstimulation protocol: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2006 Mar-Apr;12(2):159-68. Epub 2005 Oct 27. Review.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
60
July 2005
Not Provided

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hyper-responder patients (>20 oocytes retrieved)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Normal responders
  • Poor responders
  • PCOS
Female
18 Years to 50 Years
Yes
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Greece
 
NCT00415792
arvekap vs pregnyl
Not Provided
Not Provided
Eugonia
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Tryfon Lainas, PhD Eugonia
Eugonia
January 2007

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP