Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Comparison of Modafinil and Methylphenidate in Treatment of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
This study has been terminated.
( Unable to recruit any subjects for this study )
Study NCT00393562   Information provided by Department of Veterans Affairs
First Received: October 26, 2006   Last Updated: March 11, 2008   History of Changes

October 26, 2006
March 11, 2008
March 2006
October 2007   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Compare efficacy of the two agents in treating excessive daytime sleepiness at 4 and 8 weeks [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Compare efficacy of the two agents in treating excessive daytime sleepiness at 4 and 8 weeks
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00393562 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Compare the safety profile of modafinil and methylphenidate [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Compare the safety profile of modafinil and methylphenidate
 
Comparison of Modafinil and Methylphenidate in Treatment of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Comparison of Modafinil and Methylphenidate in Treatment of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

This is an open-label cross-over randomized control study comparing the effect of modafinil and methylphenidate in patients with Parkinson's disease with excessive daytime sleepiness.

Sleep disorders are common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and a significant cause of impairment of function in already disabled individuals. Almost all patients with PD report disturbed sleep, including excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), disorders of initiating and maintaining sleep (DIMS) or parasomnias.1 The underlying pathology associated with PD and medication effects have both been implicated in the sleep disorders affecting these patients. EDS has become the focus of attention because of its effect on quality of life and impairment in driving and predisposition to traffic accidents. Its prevalence has been estimated between 15-50%. Treatment of EDS has become an important factor in the management of the PD patient, and the recent introduction of modafinil, a wakefulness promoting agent approved for narcolepsy, has led to increasing off-label use of this agent. Prior to modafinil, amphetamine and methylphenidate, two classical psychostimulants, were the agents of choice in treating EDS. However, these agents also have a direct effect on the dopaminergic system. They increase both sleep and REM latency, while reducing total sleep time and REM sleep. By comparison, the mechanism of action of modafinil is unknown, yet distinct from that of the psychostimulants. A direct comparison of the effect on EDS of modafinil with classical psychostimulants is lacking. The overall goals of this research proposal are to determine which agent is most effective in treating EDS in PD patients by using an open-label randomized control study comparing efficacy, onset of action and tolerability.

 
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Crossover Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Parkinson's Disease
  • Drug: modafinil
  • Drug: methylphenidate
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Terminated
0
October 2007
October 2007   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Veteran at study site

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to give consent
  • Diagnosis of EDS prior to diagnosis of PD
  • Brain injury due to trauma, CVA, tumor or anoxia
Both
50 Years to 80 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00393562
Bucurescu, Gabriel - Principal Investigator, Department of Veterans Affairs
PADRECC 01
Department of Veterans Affairs
 
Principal Investigator: Gabriel Bucurescu, MD MS Philadelphia, OPC
Department of Veterans Affairs
March 2008

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP