| October 19, 2006 |
| March 4, 2009 |
| October 2006 |
| |
| The primary variable is a composite endpoint of days alive, days out of hospital and symptoms [ Time Frame: Assessed after 9 months of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] |
| The primary variable is a composite endpoint of days alive, days out of hospital and symptoms after 9 months |
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00391846 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
- Number of deaths [ Time Frame: Assessed after 9 months of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Changes in NTproBNP over time amd related to NYHA class [ Time Frame: Assessed after 9 months of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Changes in KCCQ (overall, symptom score subset, related to NTproBNP) [ Time Frame: Assessed after 9 months of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Changes in HFstatus and vital signs [ Time Frame: Assessed after 9 months of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of SAEs [ Time Frame: Assessed after 9 months of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of DAEs [ Time Frame: Assessed after 9 months of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
|
- Number of deaths, CV hospitalisations
- Changes in NTproBNP over time amd related to NYHA class
- Changes in KCCQ (overall, symptom score subset, related to NTproBNP)
- Changes in HFstatus and vital signs
- Number of SAEs
- Number of DAEs
|
| |
| Evaluation of Heart Failure Treatment Guided by NTproBNP vs Clinical Symptoms and Signs Alone |
| A Randomised, Single Blind, Multicentre, 9-Month, Phase IV Study, Comparing Treatment Guided by Clinical Symptoms and Signs and NT-proBNP vs Treatment Guided by Clinical Symptoms and Signs Alone, in Patients With HF and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction |
The purpose is to study if HF treatment guided by NTproBNP in addition to clinical symptoms and signs is more effective than treatment guided by clinical symptoms and signs alone in patients with HF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction |
| |
| Phase IV |
| Interventional |
| Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind (Subject), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study |
- Heart Failure
- Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
|
- Drug: Captopril
- Drug: Enalapril
- Drug: Lisinopril
- Drug: Ramipril
- Drug: Trandolapril
- Drug: Bisoprolol
- Drug: Carvedilol
- Drug: Metoprolol succinate
- Drug: Candesartan
- Drug: Valsartan
- Drug: Eplerenone
- Drug: Spironolactone
- Drug: Diuretics
- Drug: HF treatment according to Swedish guidelines
- Procedure: Blood samples
- Procedure: KCCQ Questionnaire
|
| |
| |
| |
| Completed |
| 250 |
| January 2009 |
|
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female/male, over 18 years with previously verified HF with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
- NYHA class II-IV,
- NTproBNP males>800 ng/L, females >1000 ng/L
Exclusion Criteria:
- Planned CV hospitalisation, stroke or acute MI last 3 months,
- Mitral/aortic stenosis,
- Patients already receiving optimal HF treatment,
- Severe reduction of kidney function
|
| Both |
| 18 Years and older |
| No |
| Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| Sweden |
| |
| NCT00391846 |
| Björn Ericsson, MD, Director Medical Affairs, AZ Sweden, Medical Department, AstraZeneca |
| D2452L00010, EUDRACT No. 2006-001259-36, SIGNAL HF |
| AstraZeneca |
|
| Study Director: |
AstraZeneca Sweden Medical Director, MD |
AstraZeneca |
|
| Principal Investigator: |
Hans Persson, MD, PhD |
Danderyd Hospital, Sweden |
|
| Study Director: |
Bjorn Eriksson, MD |
AstraZeneca |
|
|
| AstraZeneca |
| March 2009 |