Text Size

Prophylaxis With Ganciclovir Improves Graft Survival in Renal Allograft Recipients

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Lower Saxony Center for Nephrology
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00373165
First received: September 5, 2006
Last updated: September 12, 2006
Last verified: September 2006
History of Changes

September 5, 2006
September 12, 2006
August 2000
Not Provided
The impact of CMV infection on graft function, incidence of CMV infection and creatinine clearance in both study groups at month 12. long-term graft and patient survival. Neutrophil counts and creatinine clearance were measured on a regular basis.
For efficacy, the impact of CMV infection on graft function, the incidence of CMV infection and the creatinine clearance was compared in both study groups. For safety, neutrophil counts and creatinine clearance was frequently measured.
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00373165 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Prophylaxis With Ganciclovir Improves Graft Survival in Renal Allograft Recipients
Open, Randomised Study Comparing Preemptive Therapy With Intravenous Ganciclovir With and Without Additional Oral Ganciclovir for CMV Prophylaxis in Immunosuppressed Renal Transplant Patients Receiving Monitoring of CMV Viral Load

Study Phase: IV

Study Type: Open-label, multicenter, randomised clinical trial with two arms stratified for an intensified immunosuppressive regimen in patients at high risk for acute rejection.

Study Description: 148 kidney transplant recipients at risk for CMV disease were randomized and treated with ganciclovir capsules for 3 months (Group A, prophylaxis, N=74) or received ganciclovir IV only in case of proven CMV viral load (Group B, preemptive therapy, N=74). Initially, a 2 months follow up was planned in this trial. However, the study group decided to offer a longterm follow up to all patients and amended the protocol, respectively.

The aim of the study was to identify the most efficacious way to prevent renal transplant recipients from CMV disease and to find out, if one of these two strategies may increase graft or patient survival. Therefore, both wellknown approaches of CMV prevention were compared in two study groups:

Prophylaxis (Group A): Oral primary prophylaxis with ganciclovir capsules was started directly after transplantation and performed until day 90. In case of CMV infection (proven CMV viral load) or symptomatic CMV disease, treatment with ganciclovir IV was initiated.

Preemptive Therapy (Group B): No oral primary prophylaxis was given. Treatment with ganciclovir IV was given to patients with proven CMV viral load (CMV infection or CMV disease) only.

Disease Background: More than 60 % of adult people are asymptomatically infected with cytomegalovirus (CMV). Due to immunosuppressive therapy, renal graft recipients are at risk for CMV infection and life-threatening disease. CMV can cause a variety of symptoms in the immunocompromised host, including CMV retinitis, pneumonia or colitis. After grafting, CMV disease most commonly occurs in the transplanted organ and can trigger graft dysfunction and acute rejection. Therefore, prophylaxis or preemptive therapy should be used in order to prevent graft recipients from CMV disease.

  • CMV prophylaxis means the administration of antiviral agents to all patients at risk for CMV disease, directly after transplantation, i.e. for 3 months. Prophylaxis is in particular used for patients at high risk for CMV disease.
  • CMV preemptive therapy (or targeted prophylaxis) means CMV monitoring and initiation of induction therapy with antiviral agents in patients with proven CMV viral load only (CMV infection). This prevents non-infected patients from being exposed to antiviral drugs and the related side effects like neutropenia or renal toxicity. Preemptive therapy is in particular used for patients at lower or moderate risk for CMV disease.

Study Description: 148 kidney transplant recipients at risk for CMV disease were randomized and treated with ganciclovir capsules for 3 months (Group A, prophylaxis, N=74) or received ganciclovir IV only in case of proven CMV viral load (Group B, preemptive therapy, N=74). Initially, a 2 months follow up was planned in this trial. However, the study group decided to offer a longterm follow up to all patients and amended the protocol, respectively.

The aim of the study was to identify the most efficacious way to prevent renal transplant recipients from CMV disease and to find out, if one of these two strategies may increase graft or patient survival. Therefore, both wellknown approaches of CMV prevention were compared in two study groups:

Prophylaxis (Group A): Oral primary prophylaxis with ganciclovir capsules was started directly after transplantation and performed until day 90. In case of CMV infection (proven CMV viral load) or symptomatic CMV disease, treatment with ganciclovir IV was initiated.

Preemptive Therapy (Group B): No oral primary prophylaxis was given. Treatment with ganciclovir IV was given to patients with proven CMV viral load (CMV infection or CMV disease) only.
Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • DNA Virus Infection
  • Herpesviridae Infections
  • Cytomegalovirus Infection
Drug: Ganciclovir
Not Provided
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
150
October 2003
Not Provided

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Kidney transplant recipients after living or postmortal donation
  • CMV seropositive donor or recipient of the kidney transplant: D+/R-, D+/R+ or D-/R+
  • Laboratory parameters: 50.000/ml thrombocytes and/or 1000/ml neutrophils
  • Immunosuppression including MMF

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  • Woman who are pregnant, breastfeeding or using unreliable birth control methods
  • Forbidden concomitant medications during the 12 month observation period of the study are:
  • Virustatic drugs, active against CMV: Foscarnet, Cidofovir (HPMPC), Acyclovir, Valaciclovir, Famciclovir/Penciclovir, Lobucavir, Antisense compound
  • Antimetabolites: Fluorouracil, Mercaptopurine, Methotrexate, Thioguanine, Hydroxurea
  • Alkylating substances: Busulfan, Carmustine, Chlorambucil, Cisplatin, Cyclophosphamide, Dacarbazine (DTIC), Lomustine, Mechlormethamine, Melphalan, Streptozotocin, Tiothepa, Uracil mustard
  • anti CMV immunoglobulins (except in the case of signs of CMV infection) such as anti CMV hyperimmunoglobulins and immunoglobulins
  • Known hypersensitivity to ganciclovir
  • Patients with active CMV infection or positive viraemia at randomization
  • Severe gastro-intestinal diseases which may interfere with the oral resorption of ganciclovir
  • Conversion of immunosuppression (Replacement of MMF)
  • Participation in another clinical drug trial
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Not Provided
 
NCT00373165
ML19827
Not Provided
Not Provided
Lower Saxony Center for Nephrology
Not Provided
Study Chair: Volker Kliem, MD Lower Saxony Center for Nephrology, Transplantation Center, Department of Nephrology
Lower Saxony Center for Nephrology
September 2006

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP