Bacterial Control in Partial Thickness Burns Using Silver-containing Wound Dressings

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
University Hospital, Ghent
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00343824
First received: June 21, 2006
Last updated: February 1, 2013
Last verified: February 2013

June 21, 2006
February 1, 2013
August 2006
September 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Evaluation of the efficacy of both wound dressings in controlling wound bioburden over a period of 21 days [ Time Frame: Over a period of 21 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Evaluation of the efficacy of both wound dressings in controlling wound bioburden over a period of 21 days
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00343824 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Comparison of blood silver levels [ Time Frame: Every week until woundhealing. In folluw-up: at 3, 6 and 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of genetically-acquired resistance to silver [ Time Frame: Once after wound closure. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Healing time comparison [ Time Frame: Every 3 days until healing ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Scar quality assessment [ Time Frame: At 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after wound closure ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Cost-effectiveness [ Time Frame: Once after wound closure. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Health related quality of life [ Time Frame: At 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after wound closure ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Comparison of blood silver levels
  • Percentage of genetically-acquired resistance to silver
  • Healing time comparison
  • Scar quality assessment
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Health related quality of life
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Bacterial Control in Partial Thickness Burns Using Silver-containing Wound Dressings
Bacterial Control in Partial Thickness Burns Using Silver-containing Wound Dressings

This study is to compare the treatment with two different silver-containing wound dressings: aquacel AG hydrofiber versus acticoat burn dressing.

Not Provided
Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Burn Wounds - Partial Thickness (2nd Degree)
Procedure: aquacel AG hydrofiber versus acticoat burn dressing
Aquacel AG hydrofiber versus acticoat burn dressing will be compared.
  • Experimental: aquacel AG hydrofiber
    Intervention: Procedure: aquacel AG hydrofiber versus acticoat burn dressing
  • Experimental: Acticoat burn dressing
    Intervention: Procedure: aquacel AG hydrofiber versus acticoat burn dressing
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
100
September 2013
September 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Burn wounds with flux values, measured by Laser Doppler Imaging, corresponding with expected healing time between 7 and 21 days, flux values between 200 and 1000 (red-pink or pink-yellow-green colour)
  • Wounds treated with a hydrocolloid paste prior to LDI
  • Possibility to follow the complete treatment schedule until wound healing and participation on complete follow-up schedule
  • Informed consent
  • Partial thickness burns with TBSE < 40%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mean flux values < 200 or > 1000
  • TBSA > 40%
  • Impossibility to debride necrotic skin prior to LDI measurement
  • Wounds treated with any topical ointments or dressings other than hydrocolloid prior to LDI
  • Not following the complete treatment schedule or missing some evaluations during the follow-up period
  • Patient has any condition that seriously compromises the patient's ability to complete the study
  • Patient has participated in another study using an investigational drug within the previous 30 days
  • Patient has one or more medical condition(s)that in the opinion of the investigator would make the patient an inappropriate candidate for this study
  • The plastic surgeon decides that surgery is necessary due to unusual circumstances
  • Patient wish to decline from the study
  • No informed consent
  • Full thickness burns
Both
up to 80 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Belgium
 
NCT00343824
2006/224
No
University Hospital, Ghent
University Hospital, Ghent
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Stan Monstrey, MD, PhD University Hospital, Ghent
University Hospital, Ghent
February 2013

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP