Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial (SCUT)

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Aravind Eye Hospitals, India
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Thomas M. Lietman, University of California, San Francisco
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00324168
First received: May 5, 2006
Last updated: June 12, 2012
Last verified: June 2012

May 5, 2006
June 12, 2012
September 2006
February 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Best spectacle-corrected logMAR visual acuity, using best spectacle-corrected enrollment visual acuity as a co-variate [ Time Frame: 3 months from enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at three months after resolution of ulcer
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00324168 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Infiltrate/scar size, correcting for infiltrate/scar size at enrollment [ Time Frame: 3 months from enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Best hard contact lens corrected visual acuity, correcting for best spectacle corrected visual acuity at enrollment [ Time Frame: 3 months from enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Time to resolution of epithelial defect [ Time Frame: At the time of re-epithelialization ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Ocular perforations [ Time Frame: At the time of perforation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Best spectacle-corrected logMAR visual acuity, using best spectacle-corrected enrollment visual acuity as a co-variate [ Time Frame: 12 months from enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • The correlation between the best-corrected visual acuity and minimum inhibitory concentration to moxifloxacin [ Time Frame: 3 months after enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Analysis of outcomes will also be done by the following subgroups: causative organism, visual acuity group, duration of symptoms to enrollment, depth of ulcer, infiltrate scar size [ Time Frame: 3 months after enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Best hard contact lens-corrected visual acuity 3 months after the resolution of ulcer, time to resolution, sub-group analysis to determine if the success of steroid use is dependent on the organism, size of scar post-treatment.
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial
Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial

The purpose of this study is to determine whether adding topical steroids improves the outcomes of bacterial corneal ulcers, especially visual acuity.

Antimicrobial treatment of a bacterial corneal ulcer is generally effective in eradicating infection. However, "successful" treatment is not always associated with a good visual outcome. The scarring that accompanies the resolution of infection leaves many eyes blind. Some corneal specialists advocate the use of topical corticosteroids along with antibiotics in an effort to reduce immune-mediated tissue damage and scarring. Others fear using steroids to reduce the cornea's immune response will prolong or even exacerbate infection. Ophthalmologists have been divided on this issue for more than 30 years, and both approaches are acceptable according to the American Academy of Ophthalmology's Preferred Practice Patterns. Evidence from animal and human reports is mixed. A single randomized trial saw a non-significant benefit to steroids but was drastically underpowered (20 patients per study arm).

The study is a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether adding topical steroids improves the outcomes of bacterial corneal ulcers. Five hundred bacterial corneal ulcers presenting to the Aravind Eye Hospitals, the UCSF Proctor Foundation, and the Dartmouth- Hitchcock Medical Center are being randomized to receive antibiotic plus steroid or antibiotic plus placebo. They are being followed closely until re- epithelialization and then rechecked at three weeks, three months and 12 months post enrollment. The primary outcome is best spectacle-corrected logMAR visual acuity three months after enrollment, using best spectacle-corrected enrollment visual acuity as a co-variate.

The pilot study was conducted from January, 2005 to August, 2005 at Aravind Eye Hospital to assess the feasibility and safety and to estimate the sample size of a larger main trial. 42 patients with culture-proven bacterial keratitis were enrolled. They were treated and followed up as in the main trial, up to 3 months from enrollment.

Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Corneal Ulcer
  • Eye Infections, Bacterial
  • Drug: Antibiotics
    moxifloxacin 0.5% every one hour for 48 hours while awake and then every 2 hours until re-epithelialization
    Other Name: Vigamox
  • Drug: Topical corticosteroid
    prednisolone phosphate 1% with preservative four times a day for 1 week, BID for 1 week, QD for 1 week
  • Drug: Placebo
    0.9% NaCl and preservative (same as in steroid) four times a day for 1 week, BID for 1 week, QD for 1 week
  • Active Comparator: 1
    Interventions:
    • Drug: Antibiotics
    • Drug: Topical corticosteroid
  • Placebo Comparator: 2
    Interventions:
    • Drug: Antibiotics
    • Drug: Placebo

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
500
December 2012
February 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria

At Presentation:

  • Presence of a corneal ulcer at presentation

At Enrollment:

  • Presence of bacteria on blood or chocolate agar culture
  • Antibiotic given for > 48 hours
  • The patient must be able to verbalize a basic understanding of the study after it is explained to the patient, as determined by physician examiner. This understanding must include a commitment to return for f/u visits.
  • Appropriate consent

Exclusion Criteria

At Presentation:

  • Overlying epithelial defect < 0.75 mm at its greatest width at presentation
  • Corneal perforation or impending perforation
  • Evidence of fungus on KOH, Giemsa at time of presentation
  • Evidence of acanthamoeba by stain
  • Evidence of herpetic keratitis by history or exam
  • Corneal scar not easily distinguishable from current ulcer
  • Use of a topical steroid in the affected eye during the course of the present ulcer, including use after the symptoms of the ulcer started but before presentation
  • Use of systemic prednisolone during the course of the present ulcer
  • Age less than 16 years (before 16th birthday)
  • Bilateral ulcers
  • Previous penetrating keratoplasty
  • Pregnancy (by history or urine test)
  • Immediate steroid use necessary due to surgery or other condition

At Enrollment:

  • Evidence of fungus on culture at time of enrollment
  • Absence of bacteria on blood or chocolate agar culture
  • Best spectacle-corrected vision worse than 6/60 in the fellow eye
  • Corneal perforation or descemetocoele
  • Known allergy to study medications (steroid or preservative)
  • No light perception in the affected eye
  • Not willing to come to follow-up visits
  • Not willing to participate
Both
16 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States,   India
 
NCT00324168
H9332-21899-05, U10-EY015114-01
Yes
Thomas M. Lietman, University of California, San Francisco
Thomas M. Lietman
  • Aravind Eye Hospitals, India
  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Principal Investigator: M. Srinivasan, M.S., O.D. Aravind Eye Hospital
Principal Investigator: Mike Zegans, M.D. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Principal Investigator: Nisha Acharya, M.D., M.S. Proctor Foundation, UCSF
Study Director: Thomas M Lietman, M.D. Proctor Foundation, UCSF
University of California, San Francisco
June 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP