Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Stenoses by Doppler Echocardiography
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00281346   Information provided by Norwegian University of Science and Technology
First Received: January 23, 2006   Last Updated: January 9, 2009   History of Changes

January 23, 2006
January 9, 2009
December 2005
January 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Diagnostic yield: Accuracy, positive and negative predictive value. [ Time Frame: Inhospital ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • pr patient evaluation [ Time Frame: Inhospital ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Diagnostic yield: Accuracy, positive and negative predictive value.
  • pr patien evaluation
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00281346 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
pr stenosis evaluation [ Time Frame: Inhospital ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
pr stenosis evaluation
 
Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Stenoses by Doppler Echocardiography
Non-Invasive Evaluation of Coronary Pathology by Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography. A Comparative Study to Coronary Angiography.

Non-invasive evaluation of patients with stable angina and unstable coronary syndromes with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography to evaluate presence of significant coronary stenoses. Blinded evaluation and comparison with coronary angiography: presence and location of stenoses, and head to head comparison of clinical value and patient classification.

Transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic evaluation with extensive evaluation of coronary stenoses in all 3 main branches using colour flow, pulsed Doppler and Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR)after pharmacologic stress with adenosin in the area of LAD and RDP. Blinded evaluation of Doppler results and coronary angiography regarding the other examination modality. Coronary angiography diagnostic "gold standard". Only stable and unstable patients otherwise scheduled for angiography on clinical reasons will be examined and included in the study.

Added January 2007 after ethics committee approval: comparison of CFVR with invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) in selected subset of patients.

 
Interventional
Diagnostic, Non-Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor), Uncontrolled, Single Group Assignment, Efficacy Study
  • Stable Angina Pectoris
  • Unstable Angina Pectoris
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction
Procedure: Doppler echocardiography
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Completed
110
August 2008
January 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction, or stable angina pectoris and
  • scheduled for coronary angiography on accepted clinical reasons

Exclusion Criteria:

  • past coronary artery grafting
Both
18 Years to 90 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Norway
 
NCT00281346
Torstein Hole, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
29 FU-71-05
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
 
Study Chair: Torstein L Hole, MD, PhD Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Principal Investigator: Johnny Å Vegsundvåg, MD Unaffiliated
Study Chair: Rune Wiseth, MD, PhD Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
January 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP