|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | October 14, 2005 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | September 29, 2009 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | November 2003 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | |||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
The primary efficacy variable was forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). There were two co-primary endpoints: FEV1 area under the curve for the time period 0 to 12 hours [FEV1 AUC (0-12)] and peak FEV1 measured after 6 weeks of treatment. | ||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
The primary efficacy variable was forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). There were two co-primary endpoints: FEV1 area under the curve for the time period 0 to 12 hours [FEV1 AUC(0-12)] and peak FEV1 measured after 6 weeks of treatment. | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00239421 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Secondary endpoints were trough FEV1, trough FVC, peak FVC and FVC AUC (0-12) measured at the same times as FEV1 after six weeks of treatment, individual FEV1 and FVC profiles, rescue medication use, peak expiratory flow, results of safety measurements. | ||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Secondary endpoints were trough FEV1, trough FVC, peak FVC and FVC AUC(0-12) measured at the same times as FEV1 after six weeks of treatment, individual FEV1 and FVC profiles, rescue medication use, peak expiratory flow, results of safety measurements. | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | A Six-week Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Tiotropium Plus Formoterol to Salmeterol Plus Fluticasone in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | A Six-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Quadruple-Dummy Parallel Group Multiple Dose Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Tiotropium Inhalation Capsules Plus Formoterol Inhalation Capsules to Salmeterol Inhalation Aerosol Plus Fluticasone Inhalation Aerosol in Patients With Chronic Obstructive P | ||||
| Brief Summary | This is a six-week, randomized, double-blind, quadruple-dummy parallel group multiple dose study comparing the efficacy and safety of tiotropium inhalation capsules (18 µg per day) plus formoterol inhalation capsules (12 µg twice daily) to salmeterol inhalation aerosol (50 µg b.i.d.) plus fluticasone inhalation aerosol (500 µg b.i.d.) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Diagnosis and main criteria for inclusion were the following: Outpatients of either sex, aged >= 40 years with a diagnosis of COPD (GOLD criteria); post-bronchodilator FEV1 < 80% predicted [ECSC criteria] and post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 70% at Visit 1, pre-bronchodilator FEV1 <= 65% [ECSC criteria] at Visit 2, smoking history of > 10 pack-years, no history of asthma. Duration of treatment was 42 days. Criteria for evaluation are the following: FEV1AUC(0-12) and peak FEV1 (obtained within the first three hours of testing) after six weeks, FEV1, FVC, PEFR, rescue medication use, adverse events, pulse rate, blood pressure, physical examination. Statistical methods: Analysis of covariance with terms for treatment, pooled centre (country) and baseline reading. Descriptive statistics. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Tiotropium (Spiriva®) is a once-daily inhaled anticholinergic for the treatment of COPD. A six-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of the free combination of tiotropium 18 µg once daily plus formoterol 12 µg b.i.d. [Tio+For] to salmeterol 50 µg b.i.d. plus fluticasone 500 µg b.i.d. [Sal+Flu] in COPD patients. Information regarding the differential efficacy and safety of the two different combinations may be essential for physicians to make informed choices of therapy for COPD patients considered candidates for combination therapy. Following an initial screening visit, subjects entered a two or four-week run-in period in which they received ipratropium (Atrovent®) on a regular basis. At the second visit (Baseline), subjects were randomized into the six-week, double blind portion of the study in which they received either Tio+For or Sal+Flu. After three weeks of treatment, an interim visit was scheduled. After six weeks of treatment, a 12-hour profile of pulmonary function testings (FEV1, FVC) was obtained. Spirometric measurements were performed at pre-dose and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dosing. There were two co-primary endpoints: FEV1 area under the curve for the time period 0 to 12 hours (FEV1 AUC0-12) and peak FEV1. The efficacy evaluation (intention-to-treat) comprised 592 patients [Tio+For: N=297, Sal+Flu: N=295]. The two treatment groups were comparable with regard to demographic data and baseline disease characteristics [Baseline FEV1 (±SE): Tio+For: 1.310 L (±0.026 L); Sal+Flu: 1.325 L (±0.025 L)]. Adjustment was done for baseline and centre-effects. Study Hypothesis: The following primary hypotheses (one-sided) were tested with regard to superiority (all means are adjusted means): H01: FEV1AUC(0-12 hours) (tiotropium+formoterol) <= FEV1AUC (0-12 hours) (salmeterol+fluticasone) versus H11: FEV1AUC(0-12 hours) (tiotropium+formoterol) > FEV1AUC 0-12 hours(salmeterol+fluticasone) It was stipulated in the protocol that, if the null hypothesis H01 was rejected in favour of H11, then the following hypothesis would be tested: H01: Peak FEV1 (tiotropium+formoterol) <= Peak FEV1 (salmeterol+fluticasone) versus H11: Peak FEV1 (tiotropium+formoterol) > Peak FEV1 (salmeterol+fluticasone) Each step was only considered confirmatory providing all previous steps were successful. If any of the previous steps were not successful, any analysis of the current step would have been considered descriptive. Comparison(s): Test therapy: Test product: Tiotropium inhalation capsules plus formoterol inhalation capsules Dose: 18 µg tiotropium per day (one capsule), 12 µg formoterol twice daily (two times one capsule) Mode of administration: inhalation via the Handihaler device (tiotropium), inhalation via the Blue Inhaler device (formoterol) Reference therapy: Test product: Salmeterol plus fluticasone propionate Dose: Salmeterol 50 µg (2 puffs of 25 µg each) b.i.d., fluticasone propionate 500 µg (2 puffs of 250 µg each) b.i.d. Mode of administration: inhalation via MDI The treatment duration was 42 days each. Primary endpoint measurements were performed on the last treatment day. |
||||
| Study Phase | Phase IV | ||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Treatment, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study | ||||
| Condition ICMJE | Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive | ||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arms / Comparison Groups | |||||
| Publications * | Rabe KF, Timmer W, Sagkriotis A, Viel K. Comparison of a combination of tiotropium plus formoterol to salmeterol plus fluticasone in moderate COPD. Chest. 2008 Aug;134(2):255-62. Epub 2008 Apr 10. | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 492 | ||||
| Completion Date | September 2004 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | |||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 40 Years and older | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Netherlands, South Africa, Sweden | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT ID ICMJE | NCT00239421 | ||||
| Responsible Party | |||||
| Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 205.287 | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | |||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals | ||||
| Verification Date | July 2009 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||