Syringe or Continuous Amnioreduction for Symptomatic Polyhydramnios. A Prospective Randomized Study.

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00236340
First received: October 11, 2005
Last updated: April 18, 2007
Last verified: October 2005

October 11, 2005
April 18, 2007
January 2002
Not Provided
maternal pain (Analogic visual scale)
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00236340 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Volume of amniotic fluid drained, duration of the drainage, uterine activity,frequency of significative alterations of FHR and histologic evidence of placental abruption.
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Syringe or Continuous Amnioreduction for Symptomatic Polyhydramnios. A Prospective Randomized Study.
Syringe or Continuous Amnioreduction for Symptomatic Polyhydramnios. A Prospective Randomized Study.

To compare the efficiency and maternal and fetal tolerance of two techniques of amnioreduction used in cases of symptomatic second and third trimester polyhydramnios: syringe manual aspiration technique (S group) and continuous suction technique (C group) set to – 250 mmHg

Polyhydramnios is defined as more than 2 liters of amniotic fluid. Ultrasound diagnosis is made either by measurement of a deepest vertical pocket exceeding 8 cm, or by use of an amniotic fluid index (AFI) exceeding 25 cm. Potential complications of polyhydramnios are preterm labor, premature rupture of membranes, altered utero-placental perfusion, and maternal discomfort.

Amniodrainage has become an established technique to improve maternal comfort and reduce the risks of severe polyhydramnios in both singleton and twin pregnancies, decreasing uterine contractility, as well as over-stretching of membranes and uterus. It also acts on the pathological processes of twin to twin transfusion syndrome.

Several techniques are used to reduce symptomatic polyhydramnios. Passive gravitational drainage is long, does not allow to evacuate larger amounts of amniotic fluid and continuous maternal and fetal monitoring is difficult. The standard syringe technique is often a source of discomfort for both the patient and the operator. Continuous aspiration is faster and limits patient's discomfort.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency and maternal and fetal tolerance of these two latter techniques of amnioreduction.

A preliminary study permitted to assess the depression value created at the tip of the needle during amniodrainage: the syringe aspiration technique showed large depression variations from 0 to – 300 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). The continuous wall suction was thus chosen to be set to – 250 mmHg: depression at the needle's tip didn't vary during the procedure.

Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Polyhydramnios
  • Device: syringe aspiration
  • Device: Wall suction
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
80
February 2005
Not Provided

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women with abdomen discumfort and ultrasound diagnosis of polyhydramnios (AFI>25cm)
  • Single or twin pregnancies

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple pregnancy (more than 3 fetuses)
  • Maternal history of placental abruptio
  • Fetus with IUGR
  • Pregnancy complicated with pre-eclampsia
  • Unability to give informed consent
Female
18 Years to 40 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
France
 
NCT00236340
AMNIO-2000
Yes
Not Provided
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Not Provided
Study Director: Franck Perrotin, MD PhD Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Principal Investigator: Andrea Wagner, MD Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Study Chair: Gilles Body, MD PhD CHU Bretonneau TOURS
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
October 2005

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP