Screen and Treat for Cervical Cancer Prevention (SAT)

The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified February 2011 by Columbia University.
Recruitment status was  Active, not recruiting
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
EngenderHealth, New York
University of Cape Town
Information provided by:
Columbia University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00233727
First received: October 4, 2005
Last updated: February 28, 2011
Last verified: February 2011

October 4, 2005
February 28, 2011
January 2000
April 2006   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Efficacy of "Screen and Treat" + Cryosurgery [ Time Frame: Up to 12 months from entry into the study ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) Grade 2 or 3 or Cervical Cancer:

To determine the reduction in prevalence of biopsy-confirmed high-grade SIL (HiSIL) when a "Screen and Treat" program utilizing visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) or HPV DNA followed by immediate cryosurgery of screen positive women is carried out by mid-level practitioners without the use of colposcopy in a low-resource setting.

cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or 3 or cervical cancer
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00233727 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • HIV incidence [ Time Frame: 6 months after entry into study ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Comparison of the rates of HIV seroconversion in women treated using cryosurgery with that of demographically similar, untreated women.
  • Safety of Cryosurgery [ Time Frame: Up to 12 months from entry into study ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    To determine the complication rate of cryosurgery by evaluating the occurrence of any severe adverse events (e.g. bleeding, infection)associated with the use of cryosurgery.
  • HIV incidence
  • severe adverse events e.g. bleeding, infection
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Screen and Treat for Cervical Cancer Prevention
Safety and Efficacy of Two Screen-and-Treat Approaches for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer

The study measures the impact of "screen-and-treat" on the prevalence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer (CIN 2+). It is a three-arm, randomized clinical trial comparing two "screen-and-treat" approaches to delayed evaluation as a control. The primary outcome is biopsy-confirmed CIN 2+ at 6 months and significant complications within 6 months of randomization with continued follow-up to detect CIN2+ and other complications up to 36 months post-randomization.

Participants and Clinical Examinations: Unscreened, non-pregnant women 35-65 years of age are enrolled at three closely located clinical sites in Khayelitsha, South Africa. All women provide informed consent, receive counseling for confidential HIV serotesting, a questionnaire, a pregnancy test if not postmenopausal, anonymous HIV serotesting, and a vaginal speculum examination by nurses trained in visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA). Cervical specimens are obtained for testing for N. gonorrhea, Chlamydia trachomatis and high-risk types of HPV, and cytology. The cervix is washed with 5% acetic acid and inspected for gross abnormalities or areas of acetowhitening and a 35 mm. photograph taken. Women with significant cervicitis or vulvovaginitis are treated using the syndromic approach. N. gonorrhea or Chlamydia trachomatis positive women receive appropriate therapy. A positive VIA examination is defined as any acetowhite lesion and no attempt is made to differentiate the acetowhitening of metaplasia from CIN. Women with lesions suspicious for cancer, large acetowhite lesions extending over 70% of the cervix or into endocervical canal, and 374 unsuitable for cryotherapy due to severe atrophy, polyps, cervix distorted, cervix not adequately visualized are excluded. These women are referred to colposcopy.

Women are asked to return 2-6 days later for randomization to either: (1) HPV arm in which all HPV DNA positive women receive cryotherapy; (2) VIA arm in which all VIA positive women receive cryotherapy; and (3) a delayed evaluation arm in which women are followed untreated, irrespective of HPV or VIA status. Randomization is done at a patient level using a computer-generated randomization schedule with arm assignments provided to the clinics in sealed envelopes. Cryotherapy is performed by a nurse using N2O and a cryosurgical unit (Wallach Surgical Devices, Orange, CT) using two 3-minute freezes. Cytology results are not available at the time of cryotherapy. Both treated and untreated women are asked to return at 4 weeks for a questionnaire.

At 6 months, colposcopy is done by a physician blinded to arm and clinical information. All acetowhite lesions are biopsied and all have an endocervical curettage. Women with CIN 2+ are treated with LEEP. Examinations in women who became pregnant during the study are postponed until three months post-partum. Blood for anonymous HIV serotesting is obtained. All women who were HPV or VIA-positive at enrollment and a subset who were HPV and VIA-negative (all women enrolled in 2002) are scheduled for repeat colposcopy at 12 months, 24 months and 36 months post-randomization. At these visits, cervical samples are collected and colposcopy and biopsy if indicated is performed.

Laboratory Testing: HPV testing is done using the Hybrid Capture 2 HPV DNA assay and high-risk probe mixture (Digene Corporation, Gaithersburg, MD) at the University of Cape Town. Biopsies are processed at Columbia University and blindly evaluated by a single pathologist.

Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Prevention
Cervical Cancer
  • Procedure: HPV DNA Testing + Cryosurgery
    Patients will undergo a "Screen and Treat" program utilizing HPV DNA testing of clinician-collected cervical samples, followed by cryosurgery of screen positive women.
    Other Name: HPV DNA Testing + Cryosurgery
  • Procedure: VIA + Cryosurgery
    Patients will undergo a "Screen and Treat" program utilizing visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA), followed by cryosurgery of screen positive women.
    Other Name: VIA + Cryosurgery
  • Active Comparator: HPV DNA Testing + Cryosurgery
    Patients will undergo a "Screen and Treat" program utilizing HPV DNA testing of clinician-collected cervical samples, followed by cryosurgery of screen positive women.
    Intervention: Procedure: HPV DNA Testing + Cryosurgery
  • Active Comparator: VIA + Cryosurgery
    Patients will undergo a "Screen and Treat" program utilizing visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA), followed by cryosurgery of screen positive women.
    Intervention: Procedure: VIA + Cryosurgery
  • No Intervention: Delayed Evaluation and Treatment
    Patients will undergo a similar screening process at entry, but will be randomized to have evaluation and treatment delayed until 6 months after screening.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
7200
September 2011
April 2006   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Has a cervix
  • Never been screened for cervical cancer
  • Not currently pregnant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has previously had a Pap smear
  • Has previously undergone treatment for cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL)
  • Have lesions suspicious for cancer, have large acetowhite lesions extending over 70% of the cervix or into endocervical canal, are unsuitable for cryotherapy because of severe atrophy, polyps, cervix distorted, cervix cannot be adequately visualized
  • Is unable to cooperate with study procedures or tolerate the insertion of a speculum
Female
35 Years to 65 Years
Yes
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
South Africa
 
NCT00233727
AAAB3373
No
Thomas Carr Wright, Columbia University Medical Center
Columbia University
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • EngenderHealth, New York
  • University of Cape Town
Study Director: Lynette Denny, MD University of Cape Town
Principal Investigator: Thomas C Wright, MD Columbia University
Columbia University
February 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP