Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Micron Tracker: Computer-Assisted Orthognathic Surgery With a Third Generation Optic Repositioning System
This study has been suspended.
Study NCT00225446   Information provided by University Hospital, Grenoble
First Received: September 22, 2005   Last Updated: June 3, 2008   History of Changes

September 22, 2005
June 3, 2008
February 2006
January 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
spatial coordinates of the target (3 translations and 3 rotations) [ Time Frame: during surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
spatial coordinates of the target (3 translations and 3 rotations)
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00225446 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • time to install the eyebrow mark with each technique. [ Time Frame: during surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • adverse events due to the transcutaneous pins. [ Time Frame: during surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • number of handling realized by the nurse for each technique. [ Time Frame: during surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • evaluation of cost: number of cable versus number of marker. [ Time Frame: during surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • time to install the eyebrow mark with each technique.
  • adverse events due to the transcutaneous pins.
  • number of handling realized by thenurse for each technique.
  • evaluation of cost: number of cable versus number of marker.
 
Micron Tracker: Computer-Assisted Orthognathic Surgery With a Third Generation Optic Repositioning System
Computer-Assisted Orthognathic Surgery With a Third Generation Optic Repositioning System.

The main objective of this study is to validate a simplified platform of a repositioning system in orthognathic surgery (a third generation optic repositioning system called MicronTracker) compared with the actual clinically validated one (Orthopilot system).

For the past 10 years, the use of computer-assisted surgery has expanded and is now widely spread in the orthopaedic domain, but not in maxillary-facial surgery. The main disadvantages of this technique are the necessity to fix a mark on the eyebrow with two transcutaneous pins, which is a long and invasive act, and to connect the infrared transmitter which is in contact with the patient with the computer in a limited surgery area. In this study, we want to show that the new repositioning optic systems are performing similarly to the actual validated one, that they permit to suppress the transcutaneous pins and the computer connection, and that it reduces the financial cost of this surgery. Neither the surgery technique, nor the pre-operative check-up will be modified in the study. The two repositioning systems will be used simultaneously during the mandibular osteotomy.

Phase I, Phase II
Interventional
Other, Non-Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Active Control, Single Group Assignment, Efficacy Study
  • Computer-Assisted Surgery
  • Maxillofacial Surgery
Device: MicronTracker
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Suspended
20
January 2009
January 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mandibular orthognathic surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
France
 
NCT00225446
Eric Svahn, University Hospital Grenoble
DCIC 04 14
University Hospital, Grenoble
 
Principal Investigator: Georges BETTEGA, M.D., Ph.D. Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
University Hospital, Grenoble
June 2008

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP