| September 11, 2005 |
| July 18, 2011 |
| July 2005 |
| July 2007 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| In-stent late loss (LL) [ Time Frame: at 180 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] |
| · In-stent late loss (LL) at 180 days |
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00180310 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
- In-segment Late Loss [ Time Frame: at 180 days (all patients) and at 2 years (for a subset of 152 patients) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- In-stent Late Loss at 2 years (for a subset of 152 patients) [ Time Frame: at 2 years (for a subset of 152 patients) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Proximal and distal Late Loss [ Time Frame: at 180 days (all patients) and at 2 years (for a subset of 152 patients) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- In-stent and in-segment Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR) rate [ Time Frame: at 180 days (all patients) and at 2 years (for a subset of 152 patients) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- In-stent and in-segment percent Diameter Stenosis (% DS) [ Time Frame: at 180 days (all patients) and at 2 years (for a subset of 152 patients) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- In-stent percent Volume Obstruction (% VO) [ Time Frame: at 180 days and at 2 years for a subset of 152 patients ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Plaque behind the stent( by IVUS) [ Time Frame: at 180 days and at 2 years for a subset of 152 patients ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (ID-MACE) rate [ Time Frame: at 30, 180 and 270 days, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Failure (ID-TVF) [ Time Frame: at 30, 180 and 270 days, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) [ Time Frame: at 30, 180 and 270 days, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Persisting incomplete stent apposition, late-acquired incomplete stent apposition [ Time Frame: at 180 days and at 2 years for a subset of 152 patients ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Aneurysm, thrombosis and persisting dissection [ Time Frame: at 180 days (all patients) and at 2 years (for a subset of 152 patients) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Acute success(device, procedure and clinical) [ Time Frame: Acute ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
|
- · Ischemia driven Target Vessel Failure (TVF) at 30, 180, 270 days, and 1 and 2 years
- · Ischemia driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 30, 180, 270 days, and 1 and 2 years
- · Ischemia driven major adverse cardiac event (MACE) at 30, 180, 270 days, and 1 and 2 years
- · Proximal and distal LL at 180 days and 2 years*
- · In-segment LL at 180 days and 2 years*
- · In-stent LL at 2 years*
- · In-stent and in-segment % angiographic binary restenosis (% ABR) rate at 180 days and 2 years*
- · In-stent % volume obstruction (% VO) at 180 days and 2 years
- **angiographic followup at 2 years only for a subset of 152 patients
|
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| |
| SPIRIT II: A Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System |
| A Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions |
Prospective, randomized, active-control, single blind, parallel two-arm multi-center clinical trial comparing XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System to the approved commercially available active control TAXUS™ EXPRESS2™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System.
TAXUS™ EXPRESS2™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System is manufactured by Boston Scientific. |
The SPIRIT II trial was a randomized, single blind, active control, multi-center clinical evaluation. Subject eligibility criteria were similar to SPIRIT III and enrollment duration overlapped between studies. In this study, 300 subjects (3:1 randomization XIENCE V® EECSS: TAXUS™ PECSS were enrolled at 31 sites outside the United States. The primary endpoint was in-stent late loss at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included clinical outcomes at months 1, 6, and 9 months and 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years; angiographic results at 6 months and 2 years; and IVUS results at 6 months and 2 years. Follow-up through 3 years is currently available. |
| Interventional |
| Phase 3 |
Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
- Coronary Disease
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Coronary Restenosis
|
- Device: XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
Drug eluting stent implantation stent in the treatment of coronary artery disease.
Other Name: XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System
- Device: TAXUS™ EXPRESS2™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent
Drug eluting stent implantation stent in the treatment of coronary artery disease
Other Name: TAXUS™ EXPRESS2™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
- Experimental: 1
XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System
Intervention: Device: XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
- Active Comparator: 2
TAXUS™ EXPRESS2™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent
Intervention: Device: TAXUS™ EXPRESS2™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent
|
- Serruys, P., Ruygrok, P., Neuzner, J., Et al. A randomized comparison of an everolimus-eluting coronary stent with a paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent: the SPIRIT II trial. EuroIntervention: 2;286-294, 2006
- Ruygrok, P., Desaga, M., Van Den Branden, F., et al. One year clinical follow-up or the XIENCE V Everolimus-eluting stent system in the treatment of de novo native coronary artery lesions: the SPIRIT II study. EuroIntervention:3; 315-320, 2007.
- Khattab, Ahmed A., et. al. Differentiated analysis of an evrolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent among higher risk subgroups for restenosis: results from the SPIRIT II trial. EuroIntervention 3(5): 566-573, 2008
- Wiemer M, Seth A, Chandra P, Neuzner J, Richardt G, Piek JJ, Desaga M, Macaya C, Bol CJ, Miquel-Hebert K, De Roeck K, Serruys PW. Systemic exposure of everolimus after stent implantation: a pharmacokinetic study. Am Heart J. 2008 Oct;156(4):751.e1-7.
- SPIRIT II study: A clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions. Serruys Patrick W (Reprint). Erasmus MC, Ctr Thorax, Rotterdam, Netherlands. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 51 ( 10, Suppl. A ): p A261 MAR 11 2008
- A clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with cle novo native coronary artery lesions. Ruygrok Peter(Reprint). Auckland City Hosp, Auckland, New Zealand Journal: Journal of the American College of Cardiology 49 ( 9, Suppl. B ): p 28B-29B MAR 6 2007 2007 i2 Summit 2007 on Innovation in Intervention New Orleans, LA, USA March 24 -27, 2007; 20070324 ISSN: 0735-1097
- Claessen, BE. et. al. Two Year Clinical, Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Follow-Up of the XIENCE V Everolimus-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Patients With de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions: The SPIRIT II Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interventions. 2009. 339-347.
- Garg S, Serruys P, Onuma Y, Dorange C, Veldhof S, Miquel-Hébert K, Sudhir K, Boland J, Huber K, Garcia E, te Riele JA; SPIRIT II Investigators. 3-year clinical follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions: the SPIRIT II trial (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec;2(12):1190-8.
- Onuma Y, Miquel-Hebert K, Serruys PW; SPIRIT II Investigators. Five-year long-term clinical follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the SPIRIT II trial. EuroIntervention. 2013 Jan 22;8(9):1047-51. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I9A161.
- Claessen BE, Smits PC, Kereiakes DJ, Parise H, Fahy M, Kedhi E, Serruys PW, Lansky AJ, Cristea E, Sudhir K, Sood P, Simonton CA, Stone GW. Impact of lesion length and vessel size on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents pooled analysis from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice) Randomized Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Nov;4(11):1209-15.
- Planer D, Smits PC, Kereiakes DJ, Kedhi E, Fahy M, Xu K, Serruys PW, Stone GW. Comparison of everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with acute and stable coronary syndromes: pooled results from the SPIRIT (A Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (A Trial of Everolimus-Eluting Stents and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization in Daily Practice) Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Oct;4(10):1104-15.
- Caixeta A, Lansky AJ, Serruys PW, Hermiller JB, Ruygrok P, Onuma Y, Gordon P, Yaqub M, Miquel-Hebert K, Veldhof S, Sood P, Su X, Jonnavithula L, Sudhir K, Stone GW; SPIRIT II and III Investigators. Clinical follow-up 3 years after everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents: a pooled analysis from the SPIRIT II (A Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) and SPIRIT III (A Clinical Evaluation of the Investigational Device XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) randomized trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Dec;3(12):1220-8.
|
| |
| Completed |
| 300 |
| February 2011 |
| July 2007 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Inclusion Criteria:
- De novo Target lesion(s) must be located in a native epicardial vessel with diameter between 2.25 mm and 4.25 mm by visual estimate
- The target lesion(s) must be in a major artery or branch with a visually estimated stenosis of >= 50% and < 100% with a TIMI flow of >= 1
- Non-study, percutaneous intervention for lesions in a non-target vessel is allowed if done >= 90 days prior to the index procedure or if planned to be done > 9 months after the index procedure
Exclusion Criteria:
- De novo target lesion(s) located in a major epicardial vessel or a side branch that has been previously treated with any type of percutaneous intervention (e.g., balloon angioplasty, stent, cutting balloon, atherectomy) < 9 months prior to index procedure
- Target lesion(s) restenotic from previous intervention
- Target lesion(s) located in a major epicardial vessel that has been previously treated with brachytherapy
- Target vessel(s) contains visible thrombus
- Patient has a high probability that a procedure other than pre-dilatation, stenting and post-dilatation will be required at the time of index procedure for treatment of the target vessel (e.g. atherectomy, cutting balloon or brachytherapy)
- Patient has additional clinically significant lesion(s) (> 50% diameter stenosis) in a target vessel or side branch for which an intervention within 9 months after the index procedure may be required
|
| Both |
| 18 Years and older |
| No |
| Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland |
| |
| NCT00180310 |
| 03-364 |
| Yes |
| Kathleen Peeters, Abbott Vascular |
| Abbott Vascular |
| Not Provided
| Principal Investigator: |
Patrick Serruys |
Erasmus Medical Center, Thoraxcenter, Rotterdam, the Netherlands |
|
|
| Abbott Vascular |
| July 2011 |