Does Cognitive Rehabilitation Demonstrate Benefits in the Group Setting With People Whom Have Experienced Brain Injury?

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Nicloe Holzworth, OTR/L
Bergequist, Thomas, Ph.D.
Brown, Allen, M.D.
Sue Lepore, OTR/L
Walter Stobaugh. LICSW
Information provided by:
Mayo Clinic
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00166348
First received: September 12, 2005
Last updated: January 19, 2010
Last verified: January 2010

September 12, 2005
January 19, 2010
March 2003
February 2007   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • provide evidence which supports cognitive therapy in a group setting
  • less labor intensive
  • cost effectiveness
  • peer feedback is effective
  • provide eviedence which supports cognitive therapy in a group setting
  • less labor intensive
  • cost effectiveness
  • peer feedback is effective
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00166348 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Does Cognitive Rehabilitation Demonstrate Benefits in the Group Setting With People Whom Have Experienced Brain Injury?
Efficacy of Group Based Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Acquired Brain Injury

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is benefit from providing cognitive rehabilitation in the group setting. Several standardized tools will be used to measure progress when a participant enters the group, leaves the group and at a one year follow-up.

This research study will look at the outcome benefits of providing cognitive rehabilitation, utilizing the group process. Criteria for selecting the appropriate participants, group format and structure, as well as use of standardized assessments. The assessments used: Three Step Calendar Approach, (Sohlberg and Mateer) Satisfaction With Life scale (SWLS), Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ), Independent Living Scale, and the Vocational Independence Scale. The group setting provides an atmosphere to work on building communication skills through peer feedback and to develop psychological coping strategies. Techniques such as the problem solving format and a calendar system. Analysis and outcomes of 17 past group participants were analyzed supporting cognitive rehabilitation in the group setting.

Of the 20 participants, 3 chose not to be included.

Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Brain Injuries
Behavioral: Cognitive Group Therapy
Not Provided
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
20
March 2008
February 2007   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All participants involved in the Cognitive Rehabilitation Outpatient Group within the study time frame are eligible to be in the study.
Both
18 Years to 70 Years
Yes
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00166348
1069-03
Not Provided
Merri L Vitse, AS, Mayo Clinic
Mayo Clinic
  • Nicloe Holzworth, OTR/L
  • Bergequist, Thomas, Ph.D.
  • Brown, Allen, M.D.
  • Sue Lepore, OTR/L
  • Walter Stobaugh. LICSW
Principal Investigator: Merri L Vitse Mayo Clinic
Mayo Clinic
January 2010

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP