|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | September 9, 2005 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | September 24, 2009 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | |||||
| Primary Completion Date | |||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Change from baseline (Visit 6) in 24 hour proteinuria, after one year of treatment (study end) with telmisartan 80 mg versus valsartan 160 mg. | ||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00153023 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Change from baseline in 24 hour albuminuria, creatinine clearance, estimated GFR, serum creatinine, 24 hour sodium excretion, ADMA, 8-iso-prostaglandin F2a, hs CRP, doubling of serum creatinine, composite of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. | ||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Change from baseline in 24 h albuminuria, creatinine clearance, estimated GFR, serum creatinine, 24 h sodium excretion, ADMA, 8-iso-prostaglandin F2a, hs CRP Doubling of serum creatinine Composite of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | 1 Year Trial Telmisartan 80 mg Versus Valsartan 160 mg in Hypertensive Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Overt Nephropathy | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | A Prospective, Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Forced-titration, Multicentre, Parallel Group, One Year Treatment Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of Telmisartan 80 mg Versus Valsartan 160 mg in Hypertensive Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Overt Nephropathy | ||||
| Brief Summary | The general aim of this study is to compare telmisartan 80 mg with valsartan 160 mg in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy with adjusted blood pressure beyond the target of 130/80 mmHg after one year of treatment. The primary objective of this study is to show that telmisartan 80 mg is at least as effective (i.e., not inferior) and possibly superior to valsartan 160 mg in reducing 24 hour proteinuria after one year of treatment. |
||||
| Detailed Description | This is a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, forced titration, multicentre, parallel group trial in patients with essential hypertension, diabetes mellitus type 2 and diabetic nephropathy. After a 4-6 week Run-in period, patients are randomised to one of the treatment groups and receive either Telmisartan 40 - 80 mg or Valsartan 80 - 160 mg. The treatment regimen is a forced titration with the lower dose given for 2 weeks and the higher dose given for the rest of the treatment period summing up to 52 weeks of treatment. During the treatment period, 8 visits to the investigator are scheduled in order to control blood pressure, renal function parameters and safety. In addition, parameters of endothelial function and oxidative stress are measured at baseline, 6 months and after one year of treatment. Study Hypothesis: Non-inferiority of telmisartan 80 mg compared to valsartan 160 mg will be tested using the following set of hypotheses: Null Hypothesis: The overall mean change from baseline in UPER (24 hour urinary protein excretion rate) for telmisartan 80 mg is inferior to that for valsartan 160 mg by 0.5 g/day or more. Alternative Hypothesis: The overall mean change from baseline in UPER (24 hour urinary protein excretion rate) for telmisartan 80 mg is less than 0.5 g/day worse than that for valsartan 160 mg. Comparison(s): In order to test the non-inferiority hypothesis, analysis of covariance with treatment and centre as main effects and baseline as a covariate will be performed. Time-to-event data will be analysed using the log-rank test. |
||||
| Study Phase | Phase IV | ||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Treatment, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study | ||||
| Condition ICMJE |
|
||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arms / Comparison Groups | |||||
| Publications * | |||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 885 | ||||
| Completion Date | December 2005 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | |||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: None |
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 30 Years to 80 Years | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Korea, Republic of, Malaysia, Portugal, Russian Federation, Slovakia, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT ID ICMJE | NCT00153023 | ||||
| Responsible Party | |||||
| Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 502.396 | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | |||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals | ||||
| Verification Date | July 2009 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||