A Research Study to See if a Change in Therapy for HIV Infection Can Improve the Immune Response to Treatment

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Abbott
Information provided by:
University of Chicago
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00145795
First received: September 1, 2005
Last updated: March 21, 2011
Last verified: March 2011

September 1, 2005
March 21, 2011
April 2004
June 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Immune reconstitution measured as increase in absolute CD4+ lymphocyte count after 3 and 6 months of therapy [ Time Frame: 3-6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Immune reconstitution measured as increase in absolute CD4+ lymphocyte count after 3 and 6 months of therapy
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00145795 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
1.) Rates of ex vivo T cell apoptosis, CD4+, CD8+, both memory and naïve cell populations, 2.) Clinical HIV-related events, and 3.) virologic failure defined as HIV RNA > 2,000 copies/mL [ Time Frame: 3-6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
1.) Rates of ex vivo T cell apoptosis, CD4+, CD8+, both memory and naïve cell populations, 2.) Clinical HIV-related events, and 3.) virologic failure defined as HIV RNA > 2,000 copies/mL
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
A Research Study to See if a Change in Therapy for HIV Infection Can Improve the Immune Response to Treatment
Randomized Trial of a Switch to a Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone Versus Continuation of the Current Regimen in Patients With Poor Immune Responses to HAART in Patients With Complete Viral Suppression: A Pilot Study

Our goal is to determine if a change in therapy to one containing Kaletra can improve the immune response in patients who have previously been immune partial responders or non-responders. We also are interested in knowing if this agent improves immune response by affecting CD4 + T cell death (apoptosis) or by further inhibiting (preventing) ongoing, low-level, viral replication to levels below detection by current viral load measurements. This will help us understand why immune responses to effective antiretroviral therapy are so different and help determine some possible guidelines for managing patients with poor immune responses.

Hypothesis: Patients with poor immune responses to HAART who receive Kaletra in place of their current PI or NNRTI while continuing their current 2 NRTI backbone will have improved immune response to therapy compared to patients who continue their current regimen.

To our knowledge our study is the first study showing persistent apoptosis in a subgroup of patients with complete viral suppression in association with poor immune recovery. Immune alterations independent of active viral replication may be responsible. Recent data suggests that immune responses to antiretroviral therapy depend on residual or restored thymic function. Improved CD4+ counts in patients despite virologic treatment failure are associated with greater thymic function, while poor T cell responses despite suppression of HIV are seen with decreased thymic function. Discordant immune responses may also be due to differential effects of particular antiretroviral agents on T cell apoptosis independent of viral suppression. For example, protease inhibitors have been shown to decrease rates of apoptosis of uninfected T cells. Viral replication is never completely suppressed with HAART, even when patients have undetectable plasma HIV RNA. Therefore, varying degrees of low level viral replication or replication in certain cellular compartments may continue to drive T cell apoptosis. Finally, our data suggests that ex vivo rates of PBMC apoptosis could potentially be used predict immune recovery or identify subgroups of patients who may benefit most from changes in HAART or adjunctive immunomodulatory therapies.

At this time, although there are excellent guidelines for how to evaluate and change therapy for patients with virologic failure, there are no recommendation and little data on approaches or strategies to change therapy for patients with poor immune responses. Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir) may be of benefit to patients with poor immune responses to HAART despite viral suppression. Kaletra may have greater potency and better suppression of viral replication that is below the level of detection by plasma PCR for HIV-1 RNA. Kaletra also has an excellent pharmacokinetic profile which may result in superior inhibition of T cell apoptosis in vivo.

Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
HIV Infections
  • Drug: Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
    study accrual closed
  • Drug: Current Regimen
    study accrual closed
  • Experimental: 1
    Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
    Intervention: Drug: Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
  • Active Comparator: 2
    Current Regimen
    Intervention: Drug: Current Regimen
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
40
December 2009
June 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV Infection documented CD4+ count within the last 30 days (or drawn with screening labs)
  • Currently on a stable 3-drug HAART regimen including 2 NRTIs for > 6 month VL < 50/mm3 for > 6 months, last within the last 30 days (or drawn with screening labs)
  • Partial immune responder or immune non-responder
  • Age > 18 years
  • Labs (drawn at screening)
  • ALT < 5 X the upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Total bili < 2 X ULN
  • Creatinine < 2.0 mg/dL

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior therapy with Kaletra
  • Known hypersensitivity to Ritonavir
  • Therapy the drugs with potential serious drug interactions: flecainide, propafenone, astemizole, terfenadine, rifampin, dihydroergotamine, ergonovine, ergotamine, metylergonovine, cisapride, pimozide, lovastatin, simvastatin, midazolam, triazolam, and St. John's wart.
  • Pregnancy; breast feeding
  • Current malignancy requiring CT
  • Use of systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressive, or cytotoxic agents within the last 45 days
  • Fever and/or evidence of an active infectious complication
  • Currently in another interventional clinical trial
  • Receiving IL-2 or any other cytokine or growth factor
  • Enrollment in another interventional clinical trial
Both
18 Years to 75 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00145795
11711B
Yes
David Pitrak, MD, University of Chicago
University of Chicago
Abbott
Principal Investigator: David Pitrak, MD University of Chicago
University of Chicago
March 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP