| September 1, 2005 |
| February 2, 2009 |
| September 2002 |
| September 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| overall survival [ Time Frame: during the study conduct ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] |
| overall survival |
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00144989 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
- adverse events of induction chemoradiotherapy [ Time Frame: during the study conduct ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- chemotherapy after chemoradiotherapy [ Time Frame: during the study conduct ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- late radiation morbidity [ Time Frame: during the study conduct ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- serious adverse event [ Time Frame: during the study conduct ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- progression-free survival [ Time Frame: during the study conduct ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
|
- adverse events of induction chemoradiotherapy
- chemotherapy after chemoradiotherapy
- late radiation morbidity
- serious adverse event
- progression-free survival
|
| |
| A Study Comparing Irinotecan and Cisplatin (IP) With Etoposide and Cisplatin (EP) Following EP/TRT for LD-SCLC |
| A Phase III Study Comparing Etoposide and Cisplatin (EP) With Irinotecan and Cisplatin (IP) Following EP Plus Concurrent Accelerated Hyperfractionated Thoracic Irradiation (EP/TRT) for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer : JCOG0202-MF |
To evaluate the role of 3 cycles of irinotecan and cisplatin for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer who received one course of etoposide and cisplatin plus concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic irradiation. |
The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) previously conducted a randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) with EP in patients with extensive-stage SCLC. The response rate and overall median survival were significantly better for IP, i.e. 84.4% and 12.8 months with IP, versus 67.5% and 9.4 months with EP, respectively. The 2-year survival rates were 19.5% for IP and 5.2% for EP (7). These encouraging results prompted us to explore the use of IP in LSCLC. |
| Phase III |
| Interventional |
| Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study |
| Small-Cell-Lung Cancer |
- Drug: Etoposide and cisplatin after chemoradiotherapy
- Drug: Irinotecan and cisplatin after chemoradiotherapy
|
- Active Comparator: Etoposide and cisplatin after chemoradiotherapy
- Experimental: Irinotecan and cisplatin after chemoradiotherapy
|
| |
| |
| Active, not recruiting |
| 281 |
| September 2011 |
| September 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Inclusion Criteria:
- cytologically, histologically proven small-cell lung cancer
- limited disease
- age 20-70 years old
- performance status of 0-1
- measurable disease
- no prior treatment for small-cell lung cancer
- no history of chemotherapy
- adequate organ functions
- written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- pericardial effusion
- active concomitant malignancy
- pregnant or lactating women
- interstitial pneumonia/active lung fibrosis on chest x-ray, watery diarrhea, intestinal obstruction or paralysis, uncontrolled heart disease or a history of myocardial infarction within the previous 6 months, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, active infection, psychological disease deemed unacceptable for inclusion to the study, long-term steroid treatment.
|
| Both |
| 20 Years to 70 Years |
| No |
| Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| Japan |
| |
| NCT00144989 |
| Japan Clinical Oncology Group, Japan Clinical Oncology Group |
| JCOG0202-MF, C000000095 |
| Japan Clinical Oncology Group |
| Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare |
| Study Chair: |
Yutaka Nishiwaki, MD |
National Cancer Center Hospital East |
|
|
| Japan Clinical Oncology Group |
| February 2009 |