Irinotecan Versus Only Best Supportive Care for Gastric Cancer

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00144378
First received: September 2, 2005
Last updated: April 17, 2007
Last verified: April 2007

September 2, 2005
April 17, 2007
October 2002
Not Provided
median survival
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00144378 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
quality of life, response rates, time to tumor progression, toxicity
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Irinotecan Versus Only Best Supportive Care for Gastric Cancer
Randomized Phase III Study With Irinotecan+Best Supportive Care Versus Only Best Supportive Care as Second Line Therapy for Metastatic Gastric Cancer

The median survival at progression after first-line chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer is about 2.5 months. There are no data which a possible benefit of second line therapy. for this reason a trial which investigates a possible benefit or chemotherapy compared to best supportive care as second line treatment is urgently necessary.

Irinotecan shows response rates of 20% in the first line therapy with high rates od disease stabilization. There are few trials investigating irinotecan in the second line setting. Response rates of 20% are reported in tis setting. Irinotecan is supplied without costs from the company Pfizer.

Metastatic gastric cancer, progressive disease after one palliative chemotherapy

Arm A:

Irinotecan 250/350 mg/m2 q3w

  1. Cycle:250mg/m2/ 30min
  2. Cycle:If no toxicity>2° CTC, nor Leuko-thrombopenia>3° occured, dose is increased to 350mg/m2 Arm B. Best supportive care
Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Single Blind
  • Stomach Neoplasm
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
Drug: Irinotecan
Not Provided
Thuss-Patience PC, Kretzschmar A, Bichev D, Deist T, Hinke A, Breithaupt K, Dogan Y, Gebauer B, Schumacher G, Reichardt P. Survival advantage for irinotecan versus best supportive care as second-line chemotherapy in gastric cancer--a randomised phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO). Eur J Cancer. 2011 Oct;47(15):2306-14.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
44
Not Provided
Not Provided

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of stomach or the gastro-esophageal junction
  • Patient with distant metastases laparoscopically proven operative incurability of an locally advanced gastric cancer or patient with a tumor recurrence after gastrectomy
  • Patient with progressive disease under a palliative first-line chemotherapy or progressive disease within 6 months after termination of a first-line chemotherapy, defined as objective progression by imaging techniques according to WHO criteria
  • Age 18 and 75 years
  • Sufficient liver function, defined as serum-bilirubin <1,5 mg/dl (1,5 upper normal limit), ALT und AST < 3x upper normal limit
  • Sufficient renal function, defined as serum creatinine < 1,25 x upper normal limit or creatinine clearance >60ml/min calculated according to Crockroft-Gault
  • Contraction for patient with reproductive potential
  • Karnofsky-Index >60%
  • Measurable or evaluable tumor manifestation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Tumor progression later than 6 months after termination of first-line chemotherapy
  • KI 50% or less
  • Patient who have already received a second line chemotherapy for the metastatic setting (adjuvant chemotherapy and one line of palliative chemotherapy os allowed, biologic prior therapies are allowed)
  • Prior or current second malignancy despite of basal carcinoma of the skin and curatively treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix
  • Uncontrolled infection
  • CNS metastases
  • Other severe medical illness
  • Prior major surgery less than 2 weeks ago
  • Parallel treatment with another experimental therapy
  • Parallel treatment with another therapy aiming at tumor reduction
  • Chronic diarrhea, subileus
  • Chronic inflammatory bowel disease or intestinal obstruction
  • Pretreatment with irinotecan
Both
18 Years to 75 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Germany
 
NCT00144378
irinotecan vs. bsc
Not Provided
Not Provided
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: P Reichardt MD PhD Charité, University,Campus Virchow Klinikum, Dep. of Hematology and Oncology,Berlin
Principal Investigator: PC Thuss-Patience MD PhD Charité, University,Campus Virchow Klinikum,Dep. of Hematology and Oncology
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
April 2007

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP