Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Non-responder Study to Telmisartan 40 mg
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00144222   Information provided by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
First Received: September 2, 2005   Last Updated: September 29, 2009   History of Changes

September 2, 2005
September 29, 2009
 
 
Primary Endpoint: The primary endpoint is the change from baseline in mean stated trough DBT
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00144222 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Change from baseline in seated trough SBP at the end of 8-week double-blind treatment Seated DBP control rate (seated trough DBP < 90 mmHg at the end of 8-week double-blind treatment)
-Change from baseline in seated trough SBP at the end of 8-week double-blind treatment -Seated DBP control rate (seated trough DBP < 90 mmHg at the end of 8-week double-blind treatment)
 
Non-responder Study to Telmisartan 40 mg
A Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing a Fixed Dose Combination of Telmisartan 40 mg Plus Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg to Telmisartan 40 mg in Patients Who Fail to Respond Adequately to Treatment With Telmisartan 40 mg

The objective of this trial is to demonstrate that the fixed dose combination of telmisartan 40 mg and HCTZ 12.5 mg is superior to the monocomponent of telmisartan (Micardis, Gliosartan, Kinzal, Kinzalmono, Predxal, Pritor, Samertan, Telmisartan) 40 mg in patients with essential hypertension who fail to respond adequately to telmisartan monotherapy.

This is a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group study in patients with essential hypertension who fail to respond adequately to telmisartan (Micardis) 40 mg monotherapy.

After a screening and a 2-week washout period (screening period), the patients will enter 4-week open-label run-in period with telmisartan (Micardis) 40 mg monotherapy to assess eligibility. The study will be terminated for those who have responded to telmisartan (Micardis) 40 mg monotherapy at the end of 4-week open-label run-in period with telmisartan (Micardis) 40 mg monotherapy (mean seated DBP < 90 mmHg). About 200 patients not responding adequately to telmisartan (Micardis) 40 mg monotherapy will be randomised and treated for 8 weeks with once-daily administration of either telmisartan (Micardis) 40 mg or a fixed dose combination of telmisartan 40 mg and HCTZ 12.5 mg (double-blind treatment period).

Study Hypothesis:

The hypothesis is that the fixed dose combination of telmisartan 40 mg and HCTZ 12.5 mg is superior to the monocomponent of telmisartan (Micardis) 40 mg in pat ient with essential hypertension who fail to respond adequately to telmisartan monotherapy.

Comparison(s):

For the primary comparison the change from baseline in mean stated trough DBP at the end of the 8-week double-blind treatment will be expressed.

Phase III
Interventional
Allocation:  Randomized
Control:  Active Control
Endpoint Classification:  Efficacy Study
Intervention Model:  Parallel Assignment
Masking:  Double-Blind
Primary Purpose:  Treatment
Hypertension
  • Drug: Telmisartan 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg
  • Drug: Telmisartan 40 mg
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Completed
200
August 2005
 

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Essential hypertensive patients who meet all the criteria as follows:

    • Mean seated DBP must be >= 95 and <= 114 mmHg at Visit 2
    • Mean seated SBP must be >= 140 and <= 200 mmHg at Visit 2
    • Mean seated DBP must be >= 90 and <= 114 mmHg at Visit 3
    • Mean seated SBP must be <= 200 mmHg at Visit 3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients taking 4 or more anti-hypertensive medications at Visit 1
  • Patients with known or suspected secondary hypertension (renovascular hypertension, primary aldosteronism, pheochromocytoma, etc.)
Both
30 Years to 70 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Japan
 
NCT00144222
 
502.436
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
 
Study Chair: Boehringer Ingelheim Study Coordinator Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
July 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP