Trial Comparing Two Strategies of Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Recruitment status was Recruiting
| Tracking Information | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | August 2, 2005 | ||||||||
| Last Updated Date | September 7, 2006 | ||||||||
| Start Date ICMJE | February 2002 | ||||||||
| Primary Completion Date | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Progression-free survival after two lines of chemotherapy, defined as the time duration from randomization until progression after two lines of chemotherapy or death whatever the cause in the absence of progression or last-follow-up | ||||||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Progression-free survival after two lines of chemotherapy, defined as the time duration from randomization until progression after two lines of chemotherapy or death whatever the cause in the absence of progression or last-follow-up. | ||||||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00126256 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Trial Comparing Two Strategies of Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer | ||||||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Randomized Trial of Treatment Strategy for Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer, FFCD 2000-05 | ||||||||
| Brief Summary | The standard treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer is based on systemic chemotherapy. Several effective drugs are currently available and can be administered either sequentially or in combination. Most patients receive 2 or 3 lines of chemotherapy. The aim of this randomized trial is to evaluate the potential benefit of a bitherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin as first line chemotherapy compared with a sequential chemotherapy with 5-FU alone as first line chemotherapy followed by the combination of 5-FU with oxaliplatin in case of progressive disease, in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. |
||||||||
| Detailed Description | Background: The addition of oxaliplatin and irinotecan to 5-FU improves tumor response rate and progression-free survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer compared with 5-FU alone, but increases toxicity. It is not clear whether such combination therapies (5-FU+oxaliplatin or 5-FU+irinotecan) should be systematically used as first line treatment or as second line treatment after 5-FU failure. Design: open-label, multicentric, randomized trial Aim: The main objective of this multiline strategy trial was to compare two 5-FU based regimens with or without the addition of oxaliplatin to 5-FU in the first line setting in terms of progression-free survival after two lines of chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Treatment compared: Control arm: first line, 2-hour infusion 400 mg/m² leucovorin (LV) followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m² and 46-hours 2,400 mg/m² every 2 weeks (LV5FU2), second line, LV5FU2 + oxaliplatin 100 mg/m² as a 2-hour perfusion on day 1 (FOLFOX6), third line, LV5FU2 + irinotecan 180 mg/m² (FOLFIRI) Experimental arm: first line, FOLFOX6, second line, FOLFIRI, third line, 5-FU 250 mg/m²/day in continuous perfusion 7 out of 8 weeks or capecitabine 2,500 mg/m² per oral 14 out of 21 days or inclusion in a phase I Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Randomization: Randomization is performed centrally using a minimization technique, stratifying patients according to centre, previous adjuvant treatment, WHO performance status, and number of metastatic sites Outcomes: Progression-free survival after two lines of chemotherapy, defined as the time duration from randomization until progression after two lines of chemotherapy or death whatever the cause in the absence of progression or last-follow-up. Overall survival, secondary surgery, response rate, progression-free survival after the first and the third line of chemotherapy, safety, quality of life and costs Follow-up: Tumor assessments is performed every 8 weeks, quality of live assessment every 8 weeks until progression after 2 lines of chemotherapy or for one year if no progression. After the end of the planned treatment, patients are followed up until death or the cut-off date. Sample size and statistical analyses: 570 patients, 285 per arm will be needed to detect a difference in median of progression-free survival after two lines of chemotherapy of 3 months from 10 months in the control arm to 13 months in the experimental arm, for a type I error of 5% and a power of 80% (bilateral log rank test). The analysis will be performed according to the intent-to treat principle. An interim analysis is planned after the inclusion of 400 patients with 3 months follow-up or the occurrence of 250 events and reviewed by an independent data monitoring committee. Estimated duration of the trial: accrual period, 3 years, minimum follow-up, one year |
||||||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||||
| Study Phase | Phase 3 | ||||||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||||||
| Condition ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Study Arm (s) | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Publications * | Ducreux M, Malka D, Mendiboure J, Etienne PL, Texereau P, Auby D, Rougier P, Gasmi M, Castaing M, Abbas M, Michel P, Gargot D, Azzedine A, Lombard-Bohas C, Geoffroy P, Denis B, Pignon JP, Bedenne L, Bouché O; Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD) 2000–05 Collaborative Group. Sequential versus combination chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (FFCD 2000-05): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Oct;12(11):1032-44. Epub 2011 Sep 6. | ||||||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 570 | ||||||||
| Completion Date | February 2006 | ||||||||
| Primary Completion Date | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||||
| Gender | Both | ||||||||
| Ages | up to 75 Years | ||||||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||||||
| Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | France | ||||||||
| Administrative Information | |||||||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00126256 | ||||||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | FFCD 2000 – 05, CET 815 | ||||||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Responsible Party | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Institut Gustave Roussy | ||||||||
| Collaborators ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Information Provided By | Institut Gustave Roussy | ||||||||
| Verification Date | September 2006 | ||||||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||||||