Vacuum Suspension: Effects on Tissue Oxygenation, Activity and Fit

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Department of Veterans Affairs
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00117793
First received: July 1, 2005
Last updated: May 4, 2010
Last verified: May 2010

July 1, 2005
May 4, 2010
August 2005
September 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Limb volume [ Time Frame: Measurements will be taken after a three week acclimation period for each intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Limb volume at 3 weeks
  • Transcutaneous oxygen tension (tcpO2) levels at 0 weeks
  • Pistoning at 3 weeks
  • Step counts between weeks 3 and 4
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00117793 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Subjective measures of fit at 4 weeks
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Vacuum Suspension: Effects on Tissue Oxygenation, Activity and Fit
Vacuum Suspension: Effects on Tissue Oxygenation, Activity and Fit

The fit of the residual limb within a prosthetic socket is a primary concern for many amputees. A poor fit can lead to skin irritation, tissue breakdown, and pain. Further, amputees with diabetes or vascular dysfunction often have difficulty maintaining healthy residual limb tissue; a condition that could be mitigated by the application of negative pressure (i.e., vacuum suspension). The aim of this research is to characterize the residual limb response to a vacuum suspension system and to measure prosthetic performance in comparison to a typical suction suspension system.

The proposed research plan involves two sets of human subject experiments: (1) prospective, randomized cross-over study to quantify performance of a vacuum suspension system as compared to a total surface bearing suction socket in terms of pistoning, maintaining limb volume, step counts, and subjective measures of fit and (2) measurement of transcutaneous oxygen tension as a function of vacuum pressure.

A proper fitting prosthetic socket provides the amputee with a comfortable system allowing them to pursue many of their desired vocational and recreational goals. Unfortunately, many amputees live with an ill-fitting socket and can experience limb pistoning within the socket, which in turn may result in skin irritation, tissue breakdown, discomfort, and a reduction in activity. One of the key factors affecting fit is intraday residual limb volume changes. For an amputee with dysvascular conditions, the implications of a poor fitting socket are exacerbated by poor circulation, reduced healing potential and the compressive forces exerted by their prosthesis.

Vacuum suspension systems may have the potential to alleviate these conditions for healthy and dysvascular amputees. The purported benefits of vacuum suspension systems include, but are not limited to: improved suspension (reduction in the amount of pistoning), maintenance of limb volume throughout the day, and increased tissue oxygenation to the residual limb.

Our first objective is to characterize performance, as related to socket fit, of a vacuum suspension system using objective and subjective measures. We will do this by conducting a within-subject experiment to measure pistoning in three dimensions while walking, overall and regional changes in limb volume before and after a thirty-minute treadmill walk, mobility (step counts) and the perception of socket fit (questionnaire) as a function of prosthetic prescription (vacuum suspension system vs. total surface bearing suction socket).

Our second objective is to determine the effect of pressures within a prosthetic socket on residual limb transcutaneous oxygen tension (tcpO2) levels. We will conduct laboratory-based, in situ testing to determine how the transcutaneous oxygen tension levels, at six sites on the residual limb, respond to pressures simulating those within a vacuum suspension system and a total surface bearing suction socket.

The proposed research will allow us to understand how suspension systems influence prosthetic socket fit and residual limb tissue health and to formulate a knowledge base on two suspension systems providing prosthetists and clinicians the objective data to make better prescription decisions. In addition, the methods utilized in this study (e.g., a residual limb limb volume scanner and assessing dynamic pistoning) can be used to study current and novel suspension systems, liners, and prosthetic socket designs to provide a standard for comparison.

Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Subject)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Amputation
  • Diabetes
  • Leg Injuries
  • Traumatic Amputations
  • Device: Total Surface Bearing Suction Socket
    Current clinical practice
  • Device: Vacuum assisted socket system
    Novel socket system
  • Active Comparator: 1
    Current clinical practice
    Intervention: Device: Total Surface Bearing Suction Socket
  • Experimental: 2
    Novel socket system
    Intervention: Device: Vacuum assisted socket system
Klute GK, Berge JS, Biggs W, Pongnumkul S, Popovic Z, Curless B. Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Oct;92(10):1570-5.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
40
September 2008
September 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be over 18 years of age and less than 70 years of age
  • Have been fit with a prosthesis and have used a prosthesis for at least one year
  • Wear the prosthesis at least 6 hours per day and be moderately active
  • Ambulate without upper extremity aids
  • Able to walk at a steady pace for at least 30 minutes on a treadmill
  • Have a history of no falls within the previous 6 months
  • Be cognitively intact so as to understand the research protocols in which they are participating

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The etiology of amputation was a tumor and there is an active tumor or treatment of tumor
  • They have a significant lower extremity pain condition, musculoskeletal disorder, or neurological deficit that would interfere with their gait pattern
  • Their residual limb is ulcerated
Both
18 Years to 70 Years
Yes
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00117793
A3666
No
Klute, Glenn - Principal Investigator, Department of Veterans Affairs
Department of Veterans Affairs
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Glenn K. Klute, PhD VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle
Department of Veterans Affairs
May 2010

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP