| June 30, 2005 |
| August 27, 2008 |
| June 2005 |
| May 2007 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| HBV DNA <400 copies/mL and Histological Improvement (2 point reduction in Knodell Necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score) [ Time Frame: 48 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] |
| Same as current |
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00117676 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
- HBV DNA <400 copies/mL [ Time Frame: 48 weeks and then annually through 384 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Histological Improvement [ Time Frame: 48 weeks and 240 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Development of resistance mutations [ Time Frame: 48 weeks and then annually through 384 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Safety and Tolerability [ Time Frame: 48 weeks and then annually through 384 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- ALT normalization [ Time Frame: 48 weeks and then annually through 384 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
|
- HBV DNA <400 copies/mL [ Time Frame: 48 weeks and 240 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Histological Improvement [ Time Frame: 48 weeks and 240 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Development of resistance mutations [ Time Frame: 48 weeks and 240 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Safety and Tolerability [ Time Frame: 48 weeks and 240 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- ALT normalization [ Time Frame: 48 weeks and 240 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
|
| |
| A Study to Compare Tenofovir Versus Hepsera (Adefovir) for the Treatment of HBeAg Negative Chronic Hepatitis B |
| A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Evaluation of Tenofovir DF Versus Adefovir Dipivoxil for the Treatment of Presumed Pre-Core Mutant Chronic Hepatitis B |
This study is designed to evaluate the safety and antiviral activity of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF) compared to Hepsera for 48 weeks for the treatment of HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B. Patients will either receive tenofovir or the approved hepatitis B therapy, Hepsera for 48 weeks. After 48 weeks all patients will be switched to open label tenofovir. |
The efficacy of tenofovir versus Hepsera will be evaluated for histologic improvement, reductions in serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, changes in liver enzymes, and the generation of antibody to the virus. Safety will be assessed by evaluating adverse events, laboratory abnormalities and the development of drug-resistant mutations. After 48 weeks all patients will receive tenofovir and the efficacy and safety of tenofovir will continue to be monitored for an additional 336 weeks. |
| Phase III |
| Interventional |
| Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study |
| Chronic Hepatitis B |
- Drug: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
- Drug: adefovir dipivoxil
|
- Experimental: Double blind tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg once daily for 48 weeks then switch to open label tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg once daily for an additional 336 weeks
- Active Comparator: Double blind adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg once daily for 48 weeks then switch to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg once daily for an additional 336 weeks
|
| Marcellin P, Heathcote EJ, Buti M, Gane E, de Man RA, Krastev Z, Germanidis G, Lee SS, Flisiak R, Kaita K, Manns M, Kotzev I, Tchernev K, Buggisch P, Weilert F, Kurdas OO, Shiffman ML, Trinh H, Washington MK, Sorbel J, Anderson J, Snow-Lampart A, Mondou E, Quinn J, Rousseau F. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2008 Dec 4;359(23):2442-55. |
| |
| Active, not recruiting |
| 375 |
| May 2014 |
| May 2007 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Inclusion Criteria:
A patient must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for participation in this study:
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women, women who are breast feeding, or women who believe they may wish to become pregnant during the course of the study
- Males and females of reproductive potential who are unwilling to use an "effective" method of contraception during the study.
- Decompensated liver disease defined as conjugated bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN, PT > 1.5 x ULN, platelets < 75,000/mL, serum albumin < 3.0 g/dL, or prior history of clinical hepatic decompensation (e.g., ascites, jaundice, encephalopathy, variceal hemorrhage)
- Received any nucleoside, nucleotide (tenofovir DF or adefovir dipivoxil) or interferon (pegylated or not) therapy within 6 months prior to the pre treatment biopsy
- Evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
- Coinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV), HIV, or hepatitis D virus (HDV)
- Significant renal, cardiovascular, pulmonary, or neurological disease
- Received solid organ or bone marrow transplantation
- Is currently receiving therapy with immunomodulators (e.g., corticosteroids, etc.), investigational agents, nephrotoxic agents, or agents susceptible of modifying renal excretion
- Has proximal tubulopathy
|
| Both |
| 18 Years to 69 Years |
| No |
| Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| United States, Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom |
| |
| NCT00117676 |
| Elsa Mondou, MD, Gilead Sciences |
| GS-US-174-0102 |
| Gilead Sciences |
|
| Study Chair: |
Elsa Mondou, M.D. |
Gilead Sciences |
|
|
| Gilead Sciences |
| August 2008 |