Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Tipifarnib Versus Best Supportive Care in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00093990   Information provided by Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
First Received: October 7, 2004   Last Updated: September 19, 2008   History of Changes

October 7, 2004
September 19, 2008
January 2004
 
Overall survival
survival status
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00093990 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Compare patients treated with tipifarnib and patients treated with best supportive care: progression-free survival; complete remission rate; rate of morphologic leukemia-free state; one-year survival estimate and health resources utilization.
Same as current
 
Tipifarnib Versus Best Supportive Care in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
A Randomized Study of Tipifarnib Versus Best Supportive Care (Including Hydroxyurea) in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in Subjects 70 Years or Older (Farnesyl Transferase Inhibition Global Human Trials AML 301 [F.I.G.H.T. AML 301])

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of tipifarnib in patients aged 70 or more with acute myeloid leukemia. Tipifarnib belongs to a class of drugs called Farnesyl Transferase Inhibitors (FTI). It blocks proteins that make leukemia cells grow.

This study tests the safety and effectiveness of the experimental drug, tipifarnib in older patients who have acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The purpose of this study is to test if tipifarnib can make patients with leukemia live longer. In this study, half the patients will receive tipifarnib and half of the patients will receive the standard treatment. The standard treatment will help to control the symptoms of AML and may include hydroxyurea to lower levels of circulating leukemia cells. Tipifarnib or the standard treatment will be given until the patient's leukemia gets better, or until they experience unacceptable side effects, or until the patient or study doctor decide to stop the study medication. Patients assigned to tipifarnib will be given tipifarnib tablets. Patients should take 6 tablets with food in the morning and 6 tablets with food in the evening, for 21 days in a row. Patients will not take tipifarnib for the next 7 days. This 28 day period is called a cycle. The rest period may be extended beyond 7 days depending on how well the patients tolerate the treatment. Patients will return to the study clinic every week and to visit their study doctor at least every two weeks. A blood draw for routine tests will be done every week. Depending on how your disease is doing, a bone marrow aspiration may be done at the end of every cycle. When patients finish treatment with the study medication, or if they leave the study early, they will be asked to see your doctor for one last visit. Routine laboratory tests will be done. After this visit the study doctor will continue to check with patients to see how they are doing and if they have started a new treatment for leukemia. This check will be made every 30 days and may be made by phone to the patient or to their health care provider.

Tipifarnib; six 100 mg in a film coated, compressed tablets are given orally twice a day at for 21 consecutive days on a 28-day cycle schedule.

Phase III
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Procedure: Tipifarnib;Zarnestra; R115777
 
Harousseau JL, Martinelli G, Jedrzejczak WW, Brandwein JM, Bordessoule D, Masszi T, Ossenkoppele GJ, Alexeeva JA, Beutel G, Maertens J, Vidriales MB, Dombret H, Thomas X, Burnett AK, Robak T, Khuageva NK, Golenkov AK, Tothova E, Mollgard L, Park YC, Bessems A, De Porre P, Howes AJ; FIGHT-AML-301 Investigators. A randomized phase 3 study of tipifarnib compared with best supportive care, including hydroxyurea, in the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in patients 70 years or older. Blood. 2009 Aug 6;114(6):1166-73. Epub 2009 May 21.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Completed
450
October 2007
 

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed or re-lapsing AML
  • Patient not medically fit for combination induction chemotherapy
  • Pathologic confirmation of AML (= or > 20% bone marrow leukemic blasts)
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1, or 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous cytotoxic or biologic treatment for AML
  • Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL)
  • Central nervous system leukemia
  • Uncontrolled systemic infection
  • Uncompensated disseminated intravascular coagulation
  • Symptomatic neuropathy of grade 2 or worse
  • Known allergy to imidazole drugs
Both
70 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
 
 
NCT00093990
 
CR004372
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
 
Study Director: Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, L.L.C. Clinical Trial Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
September 2008

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP