Efficacy of Healing Touch in Stressed Neonates

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00034008
First received: April 19, 2002
Last updated: August 17, 2006
Last verified: July 2006

April 19, 2002
August 17, 2006
July 2003
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00034008 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Efficacy of Healing Touch in Stressed Neonates
Efficacy of Healing Touch in Stressed Neonates

The purpose of this project is to evaluate whether or not Healing Touch therapy (HT) helps to treat the stress of babies in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Healing Touch is a gentle use of human touch – a light, soft placement without moving of the HT therapist’s hand on a baby’s body - and energy to create balance and relaxation. The goal of HT treatment is to help babies rest better, have less pain and discomfort and to heal more quickly. Healing Touch works along with all the treatments and medicines babies receive as part of ordinary care in the NICU.

Stress is an inherent part of the experience for the neonate who is critically ill and unstable during the initial days in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Individualized developmentally appropriate nursing care is standard of care (SOC) and provides significant reduction in stressful stimulation. Developmentally appropriate, nurturing stimulation is often lacking. Touch is critical in development of neonatal self-regulation. Healing Touch (HT), a gentle touch and energy healing therapy, is proposed to ameliorate stress and enhance regulatory system development. This R21 feasibility study will involve 40 critically-ill neonates on admission to the NICU, in a parallel, randomized controlled trial, single blind design of 2 groups (N=20 each). In each day for a total of 7 days, each subject will have 2 study conditions: a significant, routinely-occurring, specified stressor followed immediately by either HT+SOC or SOC alone. The treated group will have HT + SOC following a stressor for one study condition and SOC alone for the second study condition; the SOC group will have only SOC for both study conditions. This design allows the treated group to be paired to its own control on each day. During each study condition, markers of stress response will be collected: physiological [heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation (Sa02) and respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) for cardiac vagal tone (Vna)] and behavioral [Brazelton states 1-6 and cues (self-regulatory and stress) per Bigsby]. The primary hypotheses (all in comparison to SOC alone) are: a) HT will result in improved stress recovery within each study condition, reflected by HR, RR, and Sa02;.b) HT will result in an accumulative improvement in the stress response from day 1-7, reflected by HR, RR and Sa02; c) In infants > 30 weeks gestation, HT will result in + _ improved stress response within each study condition, reflected by increased amplitude of RSA and increased cardiac vagal tone (Vna), or stress reactivity; and d) In infants > 30 weeks gestation, HT will result in an accumulative + _ improvement in the stress response from day 1-7, reflected by increased amplitude of RSA and increased cardiac vagal tone (Vna) both in stress reactivity (measured during the stress response) and in stress vulnerability (measured during sleep). Secondary hypotheses are: a) HT will result in improved neonatal behavioral state and cues during stress recovery within each study condition, as compared with standard of care alone; b) HT will result in accumulative improvement in behavior from day 1-7, during the stress response, as reflected by decrease in stress cues, increased self-regulatory cues, more relaxed behavioral state or decreased frequency of state change. Data analysis will be done using comparison measures [paired, grouped and multiple T-tests]. To assess the data longitudinally, a general linear mixed model will be used; [repeated measures analysis of variance and GEE model]. This study will begin our research in enhancement of neonatal regulatory system development and response to stress and will lay a foundation for larger scale prospective effectiveness and mechanism studies.

Interventional
Phase 2
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Stress
Behavioral: Healing Touch
Not Provided
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
13
July 2004
Not Provided

Inclusion criteria:

  • Enrollment upon admission to the NICU and up to 7 days after admission
  • Admission to the NICU requiring Level III care during the study period (7 days).
  • Infants requiring ventilator support within the first 48 hours after admission.
  • Infants requiring tube feedings > 50% of the time at the time of study entry.
  • Both term and preterm infants (Any neonate admitted to the NICU – 20+ weeks gestation to term or more.)

Exclusion criteria:

  • All infants with cyanotic congenital heart disease.
  • Other major congenital anomalies requiring immediate surgery.
  • Infants admitted for a period predicted to be significantly less than 7 days; if status changes, the infant may be entered at that time.
  • Any infant whose critical care precludes the presence of the Healing Touch practitioner at the bedside – a temporary exclusion.
  • No exclusion due to race or ethnicity – other than the language barrier for true consent mentioned above.
Both
Not Provided
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00034008
R21 AT000734-01
Not Provided
Not Provided
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM)
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Sharon I. McDonough-Means, MD University of Arizona, College of Medicine, Program in Integrative Medicine and Dept. of Pediatrics
Investigator: Iris R. Bell, MD, PhD University of Arizona, Department of Psychiatry and Program in Integrative Medicine, College of Medicine
Investigator: Rosemarie Bigsbury, ScD, OTR/L Infant Development Center, Department of Pediatrics, Women & Infants' Hospital, Brown University School of Medicine
Investigator: Jane Doussard-Roosevelt, PhD Department of Human Development, University of Maryland
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM)
July 2006

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP