Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Bicalutamide Compared With Observation Followed by Bicalutamide Plus Either Goserelin or Orchiectomy in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Study NCT00014586   Information provided by National Cancer Institute (NCI)
First Received: April 10, 2001   Last Updated: February 6, 2009   History of Changes

April 10, 2001
February 6, 2009
January 2001
 
 
 
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00014586 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
 
 
 
Bicalutamide Compared With Observation Followed by Bicalutamide Plus Either Goserelin or Orchiectomy in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer
Randomized Phase III Step-Up Study On Initial Antiandrogen Monotherapy In Comparison With Watchful Waiting In Asymptomatic T1-3 Any G (Any Gleason) NO or Nx M0 Prostate Cancer Patients Without Local Treatment With Curative Intent

RATIONALE: Testosterone can stimulate the growth of cancer cells. Bicalutamide and goserelin may fight prostate cancer by reducing the production of testosterone. It is not yet known which hormone therapy regimen is most effective for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of bicalutamide with that of observation followed by bicalutamide plus either goserelin or orchiectomy for patients who have prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES:

  • Compare the overall and cancer-specific survival of patients with prostate cancer treated with bicalutamide alone followed by bicalutamide with either goserelin or bilateral orchiectomy vs observation followed by bicalutamide with either goserelin or bilateral orchiectomy.
  • Compare the time to first and second clinical progression in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare the quality of life, including potency, of patients treated with these regimens.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, tumor differentiation grade (G3 or Gleason more than 6 vs other values), T category, comorbidity (i.e., chronic disease) (yes vs no), potency (yes vs no), type of chosen hormonal ablation (goserelin vs orchiectomy), PSA level (less than 10 ng/mL vs 10-20 ng/mL vs 20-100 ng/mL), and N status (N0 vs NX). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.

  • Arm I: Patients receive oral bicalutamide once daily. At first symptomatic disease progression, patients also receive goserelin subcutaneously once every 28 or 84 days or undergo bilateral orchiectomy. At second disease progression, patients discontinue bicalutamide.
  • Arm II: Patients are observed until first symptomatic disease progression. At first disease progression, patients receive bicalutamide with either goserelin or bilateral orchiectomy as in arm I. Patients discontinue bicalutamide as in arm I.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline, every 6 months for 6 years, at each disease progression, and then annually thereafter.

Patients are followed annually.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 1266 patients (633 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 5 years.

Phase III
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Active Control
Prostate Cancer
  • Drug: bicalutamide
  • Drug: goserelin
  • Procedure: orchiectomy
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
 
 
 

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed prostate cancer

    • T1-3, any G (any Gleason), N0 or NX
  • High risk defined as G3 or Gleason more than 6 or PSA more than 20 ng/mL and unfit or unwilling to undergo local curative therapy OR
  • Low risk defined as G1-2 or Gleason less than 7 and PSA no more than 20 ng/mL and no prior local curative therapy
  • Asymptomatic (pain score of 0)
  • PSA no more than 100 ng/mL (no more than 25 times normal)
  • No metastatic disease by chest x-ray, bone scan (if PSA more than 10 ng/mL or 2.5 times normal), and pelvic CT (if chance of lymph node metastases is at least 5% by Partin tables)
  • No bone disease that would interfere with diagnosis of metastatic disease

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age:

  • 80 and under

Performance status:

  • WHO 0-2

Life expectancy:

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic:

  • Not specified

Hepatic:

  • Not specified

Renal:

  • Not specified

Other:

  • No other malignancy within the past 5 years except adequately treated basal cell skin cancer
  • No psychological, personal, sociological, or geographical condition that would preclude study

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

  • Not specified

Chemotherapy

  • Not specified

Endocrine therapy

  • Not specified

Radiotherapy

  • Not specified

Surgery

  • Not specified
Male
up to 80 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Germany
 
NCT00014586
 
CDR0000068560, EORTC-GU-30991
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer
 
Study Chair: Gerald H.J. Mickisch, MD Center of Operative Urology Bremen
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
May 2001

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP