Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
FNS and Weight Support Treadmill Training for Gait Component Restoration
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00011596   Information provided by Department of Veterans Affairs
First Received: February 22, 2001   Last Updated: January 20, 2009   History of Changes

February 22, 2001
January 20, 2009
August 2000
 
 
 
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00011596 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
 
 
 
FNS and Weight Support Treadmill Training for Gait Component Restoration
FNS and Weight Support Treadmill Training for Gait Component Restoration

To date, conventional rehabilitation is not able to restore normal, safe, gait for many individuals with stroke. We have identified nine gait component deficits which respond to the FNS-IM intervention. This study will test a refined treatment protocol of 3 months duration to restore volitional gait by restoring those nine gait components simultaneously. In addition, we will incorporate into the treatment protocol a promising non-invasive technique of partial body weight-supported (BWS) gait training on a treadmill. BWS and FNS-IM have the potential to provide additive effects for the patient and restore volitional gait more quickly and more completely than would otherwise be possible with one technique alone.

Stroke is the third leading cause of disability in the United States. To date, conventional rehabilitation is not able to restore normal, safe, gait for many individuals with stroke. We have identified nine gait component deficits which respond to the FNS-IM intervention. This study will test a refined treatment protocol of 3 months duration to restore volitional gait by restoring those nine gait components simultaneously. In addition, we will incorporate into the treatment protocol a promising non-invasive technique of partial body weight-supported (BWS) gait training on a treadmill. BWS and FNS-IM have the potential to provide additive effects for the patient and restore volitional gait more quickly and more completely than would otherwise be possible with one technique alone. Therefore, our first hypothesis is HYPOTHESIS I: BWS combined with FNS-IM, simultaneously applied to nine critical gait components, will restore volitional normal, safe gait to patients with chronic stroke within 3 months. An advantage of BWS gait training is that it is non-invasive. Consequently, we must demonstrate the additive advantage of FNS-IM technique alone. Therefore the second hypothesis is: HYPOTHESIS II: FNS-IM plus BWS will restore volitional gait more quickly and completely for patients with chronic stroke compared with BWS alone.

A total of thirty six chronic stroke patients will be randomly divided into two treatment groups (1) FNS-IM plus BWS; (2) BWS alone. Outcome measures for hypothesis testing will be threefold : 1) Gait normality (kinematics of nine gait components); 2) Safety (number of falls); 3) Functionality (gait speed, walking endurance, and CHART, a handicap measure of mobility and activity level). Data will be collected every four weeks during the three months of treatment. Maintenance of gains will be monitored at two additional data collections at six months and one year following the end of the treatment period. Results of this study have the potential to provide the following clinically applicable information:

1. For patients with stroke, a refined treatment protocol of 3 months duration for restoration of normal, safe, volitional gait which is practical within the current healthcare milieu. 2. A definitive recommendation regarding the most effective treatment for chronic stroke patients: (1) BWS plus FNS-IM or (2) BWS alone.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

  1. Build stimulators and electrodes.
  2. Obtain measures pre and post intervention for the two groups (FNS-IM + BWS; and BWS alone) to detect gains in: a) gait pattern; b) safety; c) functional capability; and d) quality of life.
  3. Analyze data for the group receiving FNS-IM + BWS, in order to test

    Hypothesis I.

  4. Produce therapy protocols for FNS-IM and BWS intervention, and treatment progression.
  5. Test Hypothesis II by comparing the two treatment groups (BWS vs BWS + FNS-IM).
Phase II
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Uncontrolled, Single Group Assignment, Efficacy Study
Stroke
Procedure: Gait Training
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Completed
36
August 2003
 

Stroke patients

Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00011596
 
B2226R
Department of Veterans Affairs
 
Investigator: John Fryer, Ph.D. Asst. Director Department of Veterans Affairs, Program Analysis and Review Section (PARS), Rehabilitation Research & Development service
Investigator: Nancy Rocheleau, Program Analyst Department of Veterans Affairs, Program Analysis and Review Section (PARS), Rehabilitation Research & Development service
Department of Veterans Affairs
January 2001

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP