|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | December 29, 2000 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | February 3, 2009 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | March 1998 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | June 2001 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | |||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | |||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00007774 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | |||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | |||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | To Determine if Olanzapine is More Cost Effective Than Haloperidol for the Treatment of Schizophrenia | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | CSP #451 - The Clinical and Economic Impact of Olanzapine in the Treatment of Schizophrenia | ||||
| Brief Summary | Although currently marketed antipsychotic drugs are useful in the treatment of schizophrenia, efficacy and safety profiles need to be improved. Forty to eighty percent of patients either fail to respond or only partially respond to conventional antipsychotic agents. Secondary symptoms may be unimproved even in patients who respond to treatment. A variety of adverse events occur in patients receiving currently available agents. The severity of these events contributes to the poor compliance that is observed in this patient population. Olanzapine is a novel antipsychotic agent with a reduced incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms. Other side effects are minimal. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Primary Hypothesis: To determine if olanzapine is more cost effective than haloperidol for the treatment of schizophrenia. Secondary Hypothesis: Secondary objectives include evaluation of clinical efficacy, safety, social and vocational functioning, family burden, compliance and satisfaction for olanzapine relative to haloperidol. Intervention: Olanzapine (5 mg to 20 mg/day), haloperidol (5 mg to 20 mg/day). Primary Outcomes: Total inpatient hospital care costs are the primary outcome. Other major outcomes are total social costs (cost of VA health care, non-VA services and other specified social costs), efficacy measures (PANNS, BPRS, CGI Severity, and neurocognitive battery scores) and safety measures (adverse events, ECG?s). Study Abstract: Although currently marketed antipsychotic drugs are useful in the treatment of schizophrenia, efficacy and safety profiles need to be improved. Forty to eighty percent of patients either fail to respond or only partially respond to conventional antipsychotic agents. Secondary symptoms may be unimproved even in patients who respond to treatment. A variety of adverse events occur in patients receiving currently available agents. The severity of these events contributes to the poor compliance that is observed in this patient population. Olanzapine is a novel antipsychotic agent with a reduced incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms. Other side effects are minimal. Approximately 327 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One treatment group was prescribed olanzapine with daily dosage ranging from 5 mg/day to 20 mg/day. The other treatment group was prescribed haloperidol with daily dosage also ranging from 5 mg/day to 20 mg/day. A semi-structured psychosocial case management treatment program is provided for all study patients. Patients were recruited from 18 VA medical centers over a 24-month period and were followed for one year. 18 patients were enrolled at one site that had its research program terminated during the study. Because of questions regarding the circumstances that led to the termination, these 18 patients will not be included in study analyses. The major objective of the study is to determine if olanzapine is more cost effective than haloperidol. Secondary objectives include evaluation of clinical efficacy, safety, social and vocational functioning, family burden, compliance and satisfaction for olanzapine relative to haloperidol. MANUSCRIPT: Primary manuscript published in JAMA, November 2003. |
||||
| Study Phase | Phase IV | ||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Double-Blind, Active Control | ||||
| Condition ICMJE |
|
||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arms / Comparison Groups |
|
||||
| Publications * |
|
||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 600 | ||||
| Completion Date | |||||
| Primary Completion Date | June 2001 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria: Patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Exclusion Criteria: |
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | |||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | United States | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT ID ICMJE | NCT00007774 | ||||
| Responsible Party | Rosenheck, Robert - Study Chair, Department of Veterans Affairs | ||||
| Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 451 | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Department of Veterans Affairs | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Eli Lilly and Company | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Department of Veterans Affairs | ||||
| Verification Date | February 2009 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||