|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | December 29, 2000 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | October 8, 2009 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | June 1994 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | January 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
All Cause Mortality [ Time Frame: Annual ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00007644 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | |||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | |||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT):A Randomized Trial Comparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Palliative Expectant Management for the Treatment of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | CSP #407 - Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT): A Randomized Trial Comparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Palliative Expectant Management for the Treatment of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer | ||||
| Brief Summary | Radical prostatectomy provides potentially curative removal of the cancer. However, it subjects patients to the morbidity and mortality of the surgery and may be neither necessary nor effective. Expectant management does not offer potential cure. However, it provides palliative therapy for symptomatic or metastatic disease progression, avoids potentially excessive and morbid interventions in asymptomatic patients, and emphasizes management approaches for focus on relieving symptoms while minimizing therapeutic complications. The primary objective of this study is to determine which of two strategies is superior for the management of clinically localized CAP: 1) radical prostatectomy with early aggressive intervention for disease persistence or recurrence, 2) expectant management with reservation of therapy for palliative treatment of symptomatic or metastatic disease progression. Outcomes include total mortality, CAP mortality, disease free and progression free survival, morbidity, quality of life, and cost effectiveness. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Primary Hypothesis: To determine whether radical prostatectomy or expectant management is more effective in reducing mortality and extending life. Secondary Hypothesis: To determine which treatment strategy is superior in terms of prostate specific cancer mortality, quality of life, occurrence or recurrence of symptoms and need for cancer treatment. Intervention: 1) Radical prostatectomy, plus intervention for evidence of disease persistence or recurrence, 2) Expectant management with palliative therapy reserved for symptomatic or metastatic disease progression. Primary Outcomes: All cause mortality. Study Abstract: Cancer of the prostate (CAP) is the most common nondermatologic and the second most frequent cause of cancer deaths in men. No cure is currently possible for disseminated disease. Cancer confined to the prostate is believed to be curable, with the most frequently recommended therapy being surgical extirpation of the tumor with radical prostatectomy. However, despite increasing cancer detection and aggressive surgical treatment, population-based mortality rates from prostate cancer have not decreased, neither nationally nor in states with high rates of radical prostatectomy. Existing evidence does not demonstrate the superiority of this procedure compared to expectant management in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Data from case series suggest that either treatment approach provides equivalent all-cause as well as prostate cancer specific mortality. The only randomized trial was limited by a small sample size but the results favored expectant management. Radical prostatectomy provides potentially curative removal of the cancer. However, it subjects patients to the morbidity and mortality of the surgery and may be neither necessary nor effective. Expectant management does not offer potential cure. However, it provides palliative therapy for symptomatic or metastatic disease progression, avoids potentially excessive and morbid interventions in asymptomatic patients, and emphasizes management approaches for focus on relieving symptoms while minimizing therapeutic complications. The primary objective of this study is to determine which of two strategies is superior for the management of clinically localized CAP: 1) radical prostatectomy with early aggressive intervention for disease persistence or recurrence, 2) expectant management with reservation of therapy for palliative treatment of symptomatic or metastatic disease progression. Outcomes include total mortality, CAP mortality, disease free and progression free survival, morbidity, quality of life, and cost effectiveness. |
||||
| Study Phase | Phase III | ||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study | ||||
| Condition ICMJE | Prostate Cancer | ||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arms / Comparison Groups |
|
||||
| Publications * | |||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Active, not recruiting | ||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 731 | ||||
| Estimated Completion Date | January 2010 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | January 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: |
||||
| Gender | Male | ||||
| Ages | up to 75 Years | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | United States | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT ID ICMJE | NCT00007644 | ||||
| Responsible Party | Wilt, Timothy - Study Chair, Department of Veterans Affairs | ||||
| Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 407 | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Department of Veterans Affairs | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Department of Veterans Affairs | ||||
| Verification Date | October 2009 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||