Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Observational Aspirin Use and CVD in the Physicians' Health Study
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00005493   Information provided by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
First Received: May 25, 2000   Last Updated: June 23, 2005   History of Changes

May 25, 2000
June 23, 2005
April 1998
 
 
 
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00005493 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
 
 
 
Observational Aspirin Use and CVD in the Physicians' Health Study
 

To analyze existing data from the Physicians Health Study (PHS), a randomized primary prevention trial of low-dose aspirin and beta carotene conducted among 22,071 U.S. male physicians, to address questions concerning aspirin and cardiovascular (CV) disease that could not adequately be addressed during the randomized aspirin period.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The aspirin component of the trial was terminated on January 25, 1988, due to a demonstrated benefit of aspirin on myocardial infarction. At that time, however, the number of strokes and CV deaths experienced by trial participants was inadequate to definitively evaluate these endpoints. The beta carotene component of the trial continued uninterrupted until its scheduled termination in December, 1996. During this period detailed information continued to be collected on post-trial aspirin use through annual questionnaires. As of October, 1995, the number of deaths, including cardiovascular deaths, had increased fourfold from that in the randomized period, and the number of strokes had increased 3.5 times. The investigators used data from both the randomized aspirin period and the observational period following the trial to assess the impact of aspirin use on cardiovascular and total mortality, and the long-term impact of aspirin use on subsequent stroke and MI. The methods included analyses of both randomized aspirin assignment and of time-varying aspirin use, as assessed on the annual questionnaires. Because of the potential for bias, the propensity for aspirin use, particularly during the observational period was taken into account. Analyses included use of proportional hazards models allowing for both time-varying effects of aspirin use and controlling for time-varying confounders, as well as more complex procedures using causal modeling.

 
Observational
Natural History
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Coronary Disease
  • Heart Diseases
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Cerebrovascular Accident
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Completed
 
March 2001
 

No eligibility criteria

Male
 
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
 
 
NCT00005493
 
5010
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
 
Investigator: Nancy Cook Brigham and Women's Hospital
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
August 2004

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP