Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Epidemiology of Coronary Artery Calcification
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00005349   Information provided by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
First Received: May 25, 2000   Last Updated: April 22, 2008   History of Changes

May 25, 2000
April 22, 2008
April 1991
February 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
 
 
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00005349 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
 
 
 
Epidemiology of Coronary Artery Calcification
 

Using subjects from the Rochester Family Heart Study (RFHS), to characterize predictors of coronary artery calcification (CAC), a potent marker of atherosclerosis, among individuals from the general population.

BACKGROUND:

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States. Current noninvasive methods to identify individuals with atherosclerosis, such as exercise testing, are often insensitive until plaques have progressed enough to significantly impede blood flow or impair myocardial function. A large number of individuals destined to die suddenly or to experience myocardial infarction will experience no warning symptoms, having only mild non-flow limiting lesions which rupture and cause occlusive clot. Since coronary artery calcification (CAC) can identify individuals with mild, non-flow limiting lesions, CAC is a potent marker of atherosclerosis. The presence of calcium in mild, non-flow limiting lesions is hypothesized to be a predictor of coronary events in asymptomatic adults. Ultrafast Cardiac Computed Tomography (Ultrafast CT) provides a tool to obtain sensitive, noninvasive measures of both the presence and quantity of CAC.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

Beginning in 1991, the study sought to establish if age and gender predict coronary artery calcification, a potent marker of atherosclerosis, in individuals who were sampled by the RFHS and who reported no symptoms of coronary artery disease. The study also sought to establish: if measures of lipid metabolism provide additional information in predicting CAC after accounting for variation in age and gender; if measures of blood pressure, body size, fat distribution, or smoking predict CAC after accounting for variation in age, gender, and measures of lipid metabolism; if the quantity of CAC aggregates in families; whether the predictors of CAC in asymptomatic individuals differ from predictors in those with symptoms of coronary artery disease. Ultrafast Cardiac Computed Tomography (Ultrafast CT) was used to obtain sensitive, noninvasive measures of both the presence and quantity of CAC.

The study was renewed in 2001 through February 2005 to: determine whether CAC predicts clinical events after 7.5 years of active followup; identify genetic determinants of change in CAC quantity; assess whether these genes act through measurable coronary artery disease risk factors. The full sample of 1,647 asymptomatic at baseline adults will be followed prospectively for clinical endpoints, while CAC quantity will be re-evaluated in a sub sample of 1,000 individuals.

The influence of newer inflammatory markers such as fibrinogen, C-reactive protein and antibodies to infective agents will be evaluated.

N/A
Observational
 
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Atherosclerosis
  • Coronary Arteriosclerosis
  • Heart Diseases
  • Coronary Disease
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Completed
 
February 2008
February 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

No eligibility criteria

Both
20 Years to 60 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
 
 
NCT00005349
 
4218
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
 
Investigator: Patricia Peyser University of Michigan
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
April 2008

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP